Dynamic evaluation of high-and low-creativity drawings by artist and nonartist raters

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 349-360

  Kozbelt, Aaron ^a   Serafin, Joanna ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951691809     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10400410903297634     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Arnheim, R. (1962). Picasso's Guernica: The genesis of a painting. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Galenson, D. W. (2001). Painting outside the lines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.
5. Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 122-143.
6. Gombrich, E. H. (1963). Meditations on a hobby horse and other essays on the theory of art. London: Phaidon.
7. Hekkert, P., & van Weiringen, P. C. W. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389-407.
8. Jaarsveld, S., & van Leeuwen, C. (2005). Sketches from a design process: Creative cognition inferred from intermediate products. Cognitive Science, 29, 79-101.
9. Jausovec, N. (1994). Metacognition in creative problem solving. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problemfinding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 77-95). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Kozbelt, A. (2002). Products and processes of artistic creation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Chicago.
11. Kozbelt, A. (2004). Originality and technical skill as components of rtistic quality. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 157-170.
12. Kozbelt, A. (2006). Dynamic evaluation of Matisse's 1935 'Large Reclining Nude.' Empirical Studies of the Arts, 24, 119-137.
13. Kozbelt, A. (2008). Hierarchical linear modeling of creative artists' problem solving behaviors. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 181-200.
14. Kozbelt, A. (2009). Ontogenetic heterochrony and the creative process in visual art: A précis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 35-37.
15. Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (2000). A user's guide to WINSTEPS. Chicago: MESA Press. (Original work published 1991).
16. Mace, M. A., & Ward, T. (2002). Modeling the creative process: A grounded theory analysis of creativity in the domain of art making. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 179-192.
17. Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238-246.
18. Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedogogiskse Institut.
20. Raudenbusch, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Reitman, W. R. (1965). Cognition and thought. New York: Wiley.
22. Runco, M. A. (Ed.) (2003). Critical creative processes. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23. Silvia, P. J. (2007). An introduction to multilevel modeling for research on the psychology of art and creativity. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25, 1-20.
24. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Simonton, D. K. (2007). The creative imagination in Picasso's Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements or nonmonotonic variants. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 329-344.
26. Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.) (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Suwa, M., Gero, J. S., & Purcell, T. A. (2000). Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies, 21, 539-567.
28. van Leeuwen, C., Verstijnen, I., & Hekkert, P. (1999). Common unconscious dynamics underlie uncommon conscious effects: A case study in the iterative nature of perception and creation. In J. S. Jordan (Ed.), Modeling consciousness across the disciplines (pp. 179-218). Lanham, MD: University of America Press.
29. Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso's Guernica. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 23-54.
30. Wright, B.D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.