Statistical methods for the assessment of prognostic biomarkers(part II): Calibration and re-classification

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1402-1405

  Tripepi, Giovanni ^a   Jager, Kitty J ^b   Dekker, Friedo W ^b,c   Zoccali, Carmine ^a  

^a CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Calibration; Discrimination; Prognostic model; Re classification; Risk prediction

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HEALTH STATUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RECLASSIFICATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CALIBRATION; HUMANS; PROGNOSIS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 77951688419     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq046     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, et al. Statistical methods in prognostic research (part I): how do to assess the discriminatory power of prognostic biomarkers? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010 (under review)
2. Mallamaci F, Tripepi G, Cutrupi S, et al. Prognostic value of combined use of biomarkers of inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and myocardiopathy in patients with ESRD. Kidney Int 2005; 67: 2330-2337 (Pubitemid 41623394)
3. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. A goodness-of-fit test for the multiple logistic regression model. Comm Stat 1980; A10: 1043-1069
4. McGeechan K, Macaskill P, Irwig L, et al. Assessing new biomarkers and predictive models for use in clinical practice. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 2304-2310
5. Zethelius B, Berglund L, Sundstrom J, et al. Use of multiple biomar-kers to improve the prediction of death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2107-2116 (Pubitemid 351679597)