Using patient encounter logs for mandated clinical encounters in an internal medicine clerkship

Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 299-304

  Ferenchick, Gary ^a   Mohmand, Asad ^a   Mireles, Jesus ^a   Solomon, David ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CURRICULUM; DOCUMENTATION; EDUCATION; HUMAN; INTERNAL MEDICINE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; MICROCOMPUTER; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; CURRICULUM; DOCUMENTATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; INTERNAL MEDICINE; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MICHIGAN; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 77951686691     PISSN: 10401334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10401330903228430     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Denton GD, DeMott C, Pangaro LN, Hemmer PA. Narrative review: Use of student-generated logbooks in undergraduate medical education. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2006;18:153-64.
2. Connolly A. Documenting comparability of clinical experience on the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006;195:1468-73.
3. Denton GD, Williams RW, Pangaro L. Core problems reported by students in a Palm OS and Internet-based problem entry system predicts performance on the third-year internal medicine clerkship. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2003:827.
4. Rattner SL, Louis DZ, Rabinowitz C, et al. Documenting and comparing medical students' clinical experiences. Journal of the American Medical Association 2001;286:1035-40.
5. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Accreditation standards. Available at: http://www.lcme.org/standard.htm. Accessed November 6, 2007.
6. Hatfield AJ, Bangert MP. Implementation of the Clinical Encounters Tracking system at the Indiana University School of Medicine. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 2005;24:41-58.
7. Snell LM, Battles JB, Bedford JA,Washington ET.Verifying the curriculum of a family medicine clerkship. Medical Education 1998;32:370-5.
8. Achuthan R, Grover K, MacFie J. A critical evaluation of the electronic surgical logbook. BMC Medical Education 2006;6:15.
9. Goroll AH, Morrison G, Bass EB, et al. Reforming the core clerkship in internal medicine: The SGIM/CDIM Project. Society of General Internal Medicine/Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine. Annals of Intern Medicine 2001;134:30-7.
10. Ferenchick GS, Fetters M, Carse AM. Just In Time: Technology to disseminate curriculum and manage educational requirements with mobile technology. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2008;20:44-52.
11. Sumner W, II, Campbell J, Irving SC. Developing an educational reminder system for a handheld encounter log.Family Medicine 2006;38:736-41.
12. Bahn TJ, Cronau HR, Way DP. A comparison of family medicine and internal medicine experiences in a combined clerkship. Family Medicine 2003;35:499-503.
13. McGraw R, Lord JA. Clinical activities during a clerkship rotation in emergency medicine. Journal of Emergency Medicine 1997;15:557-62.
14. Bardes CL, Wenderoth S, Lemise R, Ortanez P, Storey-Johnson C. Specifying student-patient encounters, Web-based case logs, and meeting standards of the liaison committee on medical education. Academic Medicine 2005;80:1127-32.
15. Raghoebar-Krieger HM, Sleijfer D, Bender W, Stewart RE, Popping R. The reliability of logbook data of medical students: An estimation of interobserver agreement, sensitivity and specificity. Medical Education 2001;35:624-31.
16. Nierenberg DW, Eliassen MS, McAllister SB, et al. A web-based system for students to document their experiences within six core competency domains during all clinical clerkships. Academic Medicine 2007;82:51-73.
17. Pipas CF, Carney PA, Eliassen MS, et al. Development of a handheld computer documentat ion system to enhance an integrated primary care clerkship. Academic Medicine 2002;77:600-9.