A case study in the evolution of digital services for science and engineering libraries

Journal of Library Administration

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 335-347

  Hunter, Carol ^a   Lake, Sherry ^a   Lee, Carla ^a   Sallans, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Information technology; Library organization; Library services; Library space; Reorganization; Science and engineering libraries; Service models; Strategic planning; User services

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951678484     PISSN: 01930826     EISSN: 15403564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01930821003667005     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Association of College & Research Libraries: Science & Technology Section. (2009) Big science, little science, e-science: The science librarian's role in the conversation. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/about/sections/sts/conferences/program09.cfm
2. Association of Research Libraries. (2008). Reinventing science librarianship: Mod- els for the future. Proceedings from the ARL/CNI Fall Forum, October 16-17, 2008, Arlington, VA. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/fallforumproceedings/forum08proceedings.shtml.
3. Association of Research Libraries. (2006). To stand the test of time: Long-term stew- ardship of digital data sets in science and engineering. A Report to the National Science Foundation from the ARL Workshop on New Collaborative Relation- ships: The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Data Universe, September 26-27, 2006, Arlington, VA. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from http://www.arl.org/bmdoc/digdatarpt.pdf
4. Brandt, D. S. (2007). Librarians as partners in e-research: Purdue university libraries promote collaboration. College & Research Libraries News, 68(6), 365-367, 396.
5. Committee on Institutional Cooperation. (2008). CIC library conference: Program. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from http://www-s.cic.net/programs/CenterForLibraryInitiatives/Archive/ConferencePresentation/Conference2008/program.shtml
6. Foster, A. L. (2008). Strains and joys color mergers between libraries and tech units. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(19), A1-A13.
7. Garritano, J. R., & Carlson, J. R. (2009). A subject librarian's guide to collaborating on e-science projects. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, 57. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from http://www.istl.org/09sspring/refereed2.html
8. Gold, A. (2007). Cyberinfrastructure, data, and libraries, Part 2: Libraries and the data challenge: Roles and actions for libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 13(9/10). Retrieved September 17, 2009, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september07/gold/09gold- pt2.html
9. Hawkins, B. L., & Rudy, J. A. (2006). EDUCAUSE: Core data service: Fiscal year 2005 summary report. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE.
10. Hawkins, B. L., & Rudy, J. A. (2008). EDUCAUSE: Core data service: Fiscal year 2007 summary report. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE.
11. Hernon, P., & Powell, R. R. (Eds.). (2008). Convergence and collaboration of campus information services. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
12. Joint Task Force on Library Support for E-Science. (2007). Agenda for develop- ing e-science in research libraries. Association of Research Libarires. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from http://www.arl.org/bmdoc/ARL_EScience_final.pdf.
13. Luce, R. E. (2008). A new value equation challenge: The emergence of eResearch and roles for research libraries. No Brief Candle: Reconceiving Research Libraries for the 21st Century, CLIR Report-pub142. Retrieved September 24, 2009, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub142/luce.html
14. McKinzie, S. (2007). Library and IT mergers: How successful are they? Reference Services Review, 35(3), 340-343.
15. National Science Board. (2006). Science and engineering indicators 2006, Volume 1. NSB-06-01. Retrieved September 24, 2009, from http://www.nsf.gov/ statistics/seind06/
16. National Science Board. (2005). Long-lived digital data collections enabling research and education in the 21st century. NSB-05-40. Retrieved September 24, 2009, from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/nsb0540/
17. Palmer, C., Heidorn, P. B., Wright, D., & Cragin, M. H. (2007). Graduate curriculum for biological information specialists: A key to integration of scale in biology. The International Journal of Digital Curation, 2(2), 31.
18. University of Virginia. (2007). Commission on the future of the University: Subcom- mittee on academic infrastructure. Retrieved October 1, 2009, from http://www.virginia.edu/planningdocuments/commission/2MRC/Seconddrafts/all%20 new%20posted/5aReport.pdf