|
Volumn 170, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 734-735
|
Comparative analysis of different approaches to report diagnostic accuracy
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST;
HUMAN;
LABORATORY TEST;
MEDICAL INFORMATION;
PREVALENCE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
ADULT;
AGE FACTORS;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
BELGIUM;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS;
DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE;
FAMILY PRACTICE;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE SURVEYS;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MEDICINE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK MANAGEMENT;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 77951661525
PISSN: 00039926
EISSN: 15383679
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.84 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (26)
|
References (7)
|