Reinvigorating object biography: Reproducing the drama of object lives

World Archaeology

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 540-556

  Joy, Jody ^a  

^a BRITISH MUSEUM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biographical approach; Iron Age; Life history; Life cycle; Mirror; Relational approaches; Use life

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOLOGY; BIOGRAPHY; IRON AGE; LIFE CYCLE; LIFE HISTORY;

EID: 77951659795     PISSN: 00438243     EISSN: 14701375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00438240903345530     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Appadurai, A. (ed.) 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Battaglia, D. 1990. On the Bones of the Serpent: Person, Memory and Mortality in Sabarl Island Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
3. Binford, L. 1983. In Pursuit of the Past. London: Thames & Hudson.
4. Bradley, R. 1998. The Passage of Arms: An Archaeological Analysis of Prehistoric Hoard and Votive Deposits. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
5. Bridgeford, S. D. 1997. Mightier than the pen? (An edgewise look at Irish Bronze Age swords). In Material Harm: Archaeological Studies of War and Violence (ed. J. Carman). Glasgow: Cruithne Press, pp. 95-115.
6. Burleigh, G. and Megaw, J. V. S. 2007. A Late Iron Age mirror burial at Pegsdon, Shillington, Bedfordshire: an interim account. Antiquaries Journal, 87: 109-40.
7. Carr, G. 2000. 'Romanisation' and the body. In TRAC 2000: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, London 2000 (eds G. Davies, A. Gardner and K. Lockyear). Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 112-24.
8. Carr, G. 2005. Woad, tattooing and identity in later Iron Age and early Roman Britain. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 24(3): 273-92.
9. Dobres, M. A. 1995. Gender and prehistoric technology: on the social agency of technical strategies. World Archaeology, 27(1): 25-49.
10. Dobres, M. A. 1999. Technology's links and chaînes: the processual unfolding of technique and technician. In The Social Dynamics of Technology: Practice, Politics and World Views (eds M. A. Dobres and C. R. Hoffman). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 124-46.
11. Dobres, M. A. 2000. Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
12. Dobres, M. A. and Hoffman, C. R. 1994. Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1(3): 211-58.
13. Dungworth, D. 1997. Copper metallurgy in Iron Age Britain: some recent research. In Re-constructing Iron Age Societies (eds A. Gwilt and C. Haselgrove). Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 71, pp. 46-50.
14. Eckardt, H. and Williams, H. 2003. Objects without a past? The use of Roman objects in early Anglo-Saxon graves. In Archaeologies of Remembrance (ed. H. Williams). London: Plenum, pp. 141-70.
15. Fitzpatrick, A. P. 1997. A 1st-century AD 'Durotrigian' inhumation burial with a decorated Iron Age mirror from Portesham, Dorset. Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society, 118: 51-70.
16. Fontijn, D. R. 2002. Sacrificial landscapes: cultural biographies of persons, objects and 'natural' places in the Bronze Age of the southern Netherlands, c. 2300-600BC. Analecta Prahistorical Leidensia, 33-4.
17. Foucault, M. 1990. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 3, The Care of the Self. London: Penguin.
18. Fox, A. and Pollard, S. 1973. A decorated bronze mirror from an Iron-Age settlement at Holcombe, near Uplyme, Devon. Antiquaries Journal, 53: 21-41.
19. Fox, C. 1958. Pattern and Purpose: A Survey of Early Celtic Art in Britain. Cardiff: The National Museum of Wales.
20. Gallardo, F., Castro, V. and Miranda, P. 1999. Riders on the storm: rock art in the Atacama Desert (northern Chile). World Archaeology, 31(2): 225-42.
21. Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
22. Gerritsen, F. 1999. To build and to abandon: the cultural biography of late prehistoric houses and farmsteads in the southern Netherlands. Archaeological Dialogues, 6(2): 79-97.
23. Giles, M. and Joy, J. P. 2007. Mirrors in the British Iron Age. In The Book of the Mirror: An Interdisciplinary Collection Exploring the Cultural Story of the Mirror (ed. M. Anderson). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 16-31.
24. Gillings, M. and Pollard, J. 1999. Non-portable stone artefacts and contexts of meaning: the tale of Grey Whether. World Archaeology, 31(2): 179-93. www.museums.ncl.ac.uk/Avebury/stone4.htm
25. Gosden, C. and Marshall, Y. 1999. The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology, 31(2): 169-78.
26. Hamilakis, Y. 1999. Stories from exile: fragments from the cultural biography of the Parthenon (or 'Elgin') marbles. World Archaeology, 31(2): 303-20.
27. Hendrickson, C. 1995. Weaving Identities: Construction of Dress and Self in a Highland Guatemala Town. Austin: University of Texas Press.
28. Hill, J. D. 1997. 'The end of one kind of body and the beginning of another kind of body'? Toiletinstruments and 'Romanization' in southern England during the first century AD. In Re-constructing Iron Age Societies (eds A. Gwilt and C. Haselgrove). Oxford: Oxbow Monograph 71, pp. 96-107.
29. Hill, J. D. 2001. Romanisation, gender and class: recent approaches to identity in Britain and their possible consequences. In Britons and Romans: Advancing an Archaeological Agenda (eds S. James and M. Millett). York: Council for British Archaeology Research Reports 125, pp. 12-18.
30. Hill, J. D. 2002. Just about the potter's wheel? Using, making and depositing middle and later Iron Age pots in East Anglia. In Prehistoric Britain: The Ceramic Basis (eds A. Woodward and J. D. Hill). Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 143-60.
31. Holtorf, C. J. 1998. The life-histories of megaliths in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany). World Archaeology, 30(1): 23-38.
32. Holtorf, C. J. 2000-1. Monumental past: the life-histories of megalithic monuments in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany). http://citdpress.utsc.utoronto.ca/holtorf/
33. Holtorf, C. J. 2002a. Excavations at Monte da Igreja near Evora (Portugal): from the life-history of a monument to re-uses of ancient objects. Journal of Iberian Archaeology, 4: 177-201.
34. Holtorf, C. J. 2002b. Notes on the life history of a pot sherd. Journal of Material Culture, 7(1): 49-71.
35. Hoskins, J. 1998. Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People's Lives. London and New York: Routledge.
36. Inomata, T. and Coben, L. S. (eds) 2006. Archaeology of Performance: Theatres of Power, Community and Politics. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
37. Jackson, R. 1985. Cosmetic sets from late Iron Age and Roman Britain. Britannia, 16: 165-92.
38. Jones, A. 2002. Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Joy, J. 2002. Biography of a medal: people and the things they value. In Materiel Culture: The Archaeology of Twentieth-Century Conflict (eds J. Schofield, W. G. Johnson and C. M. Beck). London and New York: Routledge, pp. 132-42.
40. Joy, J. 2008a. Reflections on the Iron Age: biographies of mirrors. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Southampton.
41. Joy, J. 2008b. Reflections on Celtic Art: a re-examination of the mirror style. In Celtic Art: New Approaches (eds D. Garrow, C. Gosden and J. D. Hill). Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 78-99.
42. Jundi, S. and Hill, J. D. 1998. Brooches and identities in first century AD Britain: more than meets the eye? In TRAC 97: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference, Nottingham 1997 (eds C. Forcey, J. Hawthorne and R. Witcher). Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 125-37.
43. Knappett, C. 2004. The affordances of things: a post-Gibsonian perspective on the relationality of mind and matter. In Rethinking Materiality: The Engagement of Mind with the Material World (eds E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden and C. Renfrew). Cambridge: MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 43-51.
44. Knappett, C. 2005. Thinking through Material Culture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
45. Kopytoff, I. 1986. The cultural biography of things: commoditisation as process. In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (ed. A. Appadurai). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64-91.
46. Last, J. 1998. Books of life: biography and memory in a Bronze Age barrow. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 17(1): 43-53.
47. MacGregor, G. 1999. Making sense of the past in the present: a sensory analysis of carved stone balls. World Archaeology, 31(2): 258-71.
48. MacKenzie, M. A. 1991. Androgynous Objects. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.
49. Marshall, Y. 2008. The social lives of lived and inscribed objects: a Lapita perspective. Journal of the Polynesian Society, 117(1): 59-101.
50. Marshall, Y. and Gosden, C. (eds) 1999. The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology, 31(2): 169-320.
51. Moreland, J. 1999. The world(s) of the cross. World Archaeology, 31(2): 194-213.
52. Munn, N. D. 1986. The Fame of Gawa: A Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim (Papua New Guinea) Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Northover, J. P. 1984. Iron Age bronze metallurgy in central southern England. In Aspects of the Iron Age in Central Southern Britain (eds B. Cunliffe and D. Miles). Oxford: University of Oxford Committee for Archaeology, pp. 126-45.
54. Northover, J. P. 1995. The technology of metalwork: bronze and gold. In The Celtic World (ed. M. J. Green). London and New York: Routledge, pp. 285-309.
55. Olsen, B. 2003. Material culture after text: re-membering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 36(2): 87-104.
56. Parfit, K. 1998. A late Iron Age burial from Chilham Castle, near Canterbury, Kent. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 64: 343-51.
57. Parker-Pearson, M. 1999. The Archaeology of Death and Burial. Stroud: Sutton.
58. Pearson, M. and Shanks, M. 2001. Theatre/Archaeology. London: Routledge.
59. Peers, L. 1999. Many tender ties: the shifting contexts and meanings of the S Black bag. World Archaeology, 31(2): 288-302.
60. Rainbird, P. 1999. Entangled biographies: western Pacific ceramics and the tombs of Pohnpei. World Archaeology, 31(2): 214-44.
61. Saunders, N. J. 1999. Biographies of brilliance: pearls, transformations of matter and being, c. AD 1492. World Archaeology, 31(2): 243-57.
62. Schiffer, M. B. 1972. Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity, 37(2): 156-65.
63. Schiffer, M. B. 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
64. Schiffer, M. B. 2000. Indigenous theories, scientific theories and product histories. In Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture (ed. P. M. Graves-Brown). London: Routledge, pp. 72-96.
65. Schiffer, M. B. 2004. Studying technological change: a behavioural perspective. World Archaeology, 36(4): 579-85.
66. Schiffer, M. B. 2005a. The electric lighthouse in the nineteenth century: aid to navigation and political technology. Technology and Culture, 46: 275-305.
67. Schiffer, M. B. 2005b. The devil is in the details: the cascade model of invention processes. American Antiquity, 70(3): 485-502.
68. Schiffer, M. B. and Skibo, J. M. 1997. The explanation of artefact variability. American Antiquity, 62(1): 27-50.
69. Schiffer, M. B., Skibo, J. M., Griffitts, J. L., Hollenback, K. L. and Longacre, W. A. 2001. Behavioural archaeology and the study of technology. American Antiquity, 66(4): 729-37.
70. Seip, L. P. 1999. Transformations of meaning: the life history of the Naxalk mask. World Archaeology, 31(2): 272-87.
71. Skibo, J. M. and Schiffer, M. B. 2001. Understanding artefact variability and change: a behavioural framework. In Anthropological Perspectives on Technology (ed. M. B. Schiffer). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 139-49.
72. Sørensen, M. L. S. 1997. Reading dress: the construction of social categories and identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology, 5(1): 93-114.
73. Spector, J. D. 1993. What This Awl Means: Feminist Archaeology at a Watipeton Dakota Village. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press.
74. Stead, I. M. 1996. Celtic Art in Britain before the Roman Conquest. London: British Museum Press.
75. Strathern, M. 1988. The Gender of the Gift. Berkeley: University of California Press.
76. Taylor, R. J. 1993. Hoards of the Bronze Age in Southern Britain: Analysis and Interpretation. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, British Series 228.
77. Thomas, J. 1996. Time Culture and Identity: An Interpretive Archaeology. London and New York: Routledge.
78. Tilley, C. 1996. An Ethnography of the Neolithic: Early Prehistoric Societies in Southern Scandinavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. Tilley, C. 1999. Metaphor and Material Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
80. Tringham, R. 1994. Engendered places in prehistory. Gender, Place and Culture, 1(2): 169-203.
81. Vellings, M. 1999. Merits and limits of the biographic approach. Archaeological Dialogues, 6(2): 98-101.
82. Whimster, R. P. 1981. Burial Practices in Iron Age Britain: A Discussion and Gazetteer of the Evidence c.700 BC-AD 43. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, British Series 90.
83. Whitely, J. 2002. Objects with attitude: biographical facts and fallacies in the study of late Bronze Age and early Iron Age warrior graves. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 12(2): 217-32.
84. Woodward, A. 1993. Discussion. In Poundbury, Vol. 2, The Cemeteries (eds D. E. Farwell and T. I. Molleson). Dorchester: Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society Monograph Series Number 11, pp. 215-39.
85. Woodward, A. 2002. Beads and beakers: heirlooms and relics in the early Bronze Age. Antiquity, 76: 1040-7.
86. York, J. 2002. The life cycle of Bronze Age metalwork from the Thames. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 21(1): 77-92.