Strategic statutory interpretation by administrative agencies

American Law and Economics Review

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 95-115

  Givati, Yehonatan ^a  

^a HARVARD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951659728     PISSN: 14657252     EISSN: 14657260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aler/ahp017     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Avila, Aaron P. 2000. "Application of the Chevron Doctrine in the D.C. Circuit," 8 New York University Environmental Law Journal 398-436.
2. Breyer, Stephen. 1986. "Judicial Review of Questions of Law and Policy," 38 Administrative Law Review 363-98.
3. Cohen, Linda R., and Matthew L. Spitzer. 1994. "Solving the Chevron Puzzle," 57 Law and Contemporary Problems 65-110.
4. Elliott, E. Donald. 2005. "Chevron Matters: How the Chevron Doctrine Redefined the Roles of Congress, Courts and Agencies in Environmental Law," 16 Villanova Environmental Law Journal 1-18.
5. Eskridge, William N., Jr., and Lauren E. Baer. "The Continuum of Deference: Supreme Court Treatment of Agency Statutory Interpretations from Chevron to Hamdan," 96 Georgetown Law Journal 1083-1226.
6. Eskridge, William N., Jr., and John Ferejohn. 1992. "Making the Deal Stick: Enforcing the Original Constitutional Structure of Lawmaking in the Modern Regulatory State," 8 Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 165-89.
7. Gossett, David M. 1997. "Chevron, Take Two: Deference to Revised Agencies' Interpretation of Statutes," 64 University of Chicago Law Review 681-708.
8. Ferejohn, John A., and Barry R. Weingast. 1992. "A Positive Theory of Statutory Interpretation," 12 International Review of Law and Economics 263-79.
9. Hickman, Kristin E., and Matthew D. Krueger. 2007. "In Search of the Modern Skidmore Standard," 107 Columbia Law Review 1235-1320.
10. Kerr, Orin S. 1998. "Shedding Light on Chevron: An Empirical Study of the Chevron Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals," 15 Yale Journal on Regulation 1-60.
11. Merrill, Thomas W. 1992. "Judicial Deference to Executive Precedent," 101 Yale Journal on Regulation 969-1041.
12. Pierce, Jr., Richard J. 1988. "Chevron and Its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Statutory Provisions," 41 Vanderbilt Law Review 301-14.
13. Scalia, Antonin. 1989. "Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretations of Law," 1989 Duke Law Journal 511-21.
14. Schuck Peter H., and E. Donald Elliott. 1990. "To The Chevron Station: An Empirical Study of Federal Administrative Law," 1990 Duke Law Journal 984-1077.
15. Shavell, Steven. 2006. "The Appeals Process and Adjudicator Incentives," 35 Journal of Legal Studies 1-29.
16. Spiller, Pablo T. 1992. "Agency Discretion under Judicial Review," 16 Mathematical and Computer Modelling 185-200.
17. Starr, Kenneth W. 1986. "Judicial Review in the Post-Chevron Era," 3 Yale Journal on Regulation 283-312.
18. Stephenson, Matthew C. 2006. "The Strategic Substitution Effect: Textual Plausibility, Procedural Formality, and Judicial Review of Agency Statutory Interpretations," 120 Harvard Law Review 528-72.
19. Stephenson, Matthew C., and Adrian Vermeule. 2009. "Chevron Has Only One Step," 95 Virginia Law Review 597-609.
20. Sunstein, Cass R. 1989. "On the Costs and Benefits of Aggressive Judicial Review of Agency Action," 1989 Duke Law Journal 522-37.
21. --- 1990. "Law and Administration after Chevron," 90 Columbia Law Review 2071-2120.
22. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1998. IRS Personnel Administration: Use of Enforcement Statistics in Employee Evaluation.
23. Womack, Eric R. 2002. "Into the Third Era of Administrative Law: An Empirical Study of the Supreme Court's Retreat from Chevron Principles in United States v. Mead," 107 Dickinson Law Review 289-341.