Conducting qualitative research on cervical cancer screening among diverse groups of immigrant women: Research reflections: Challenges and solutions

Canadian Family Physician

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  Karwalajtys, Tina L ^a   Redwood Campbell, Lynda J ^a   Fowler, Nancy C ^a   Lohfeld, Lynne H ^a   Howard, Michelle ^a   Kaczorowski, Janusz A ^b   Lytwyn, Alice ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; CANCER RESEARCH; CANCER SCREENING; CULTURAL FACTOR; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMMIGRANT; PATIENT SELECTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIOECONOMICS; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; CANADA; CULTURAL COMPETENCY; EMIGRANTS AND IMMIGRANTS; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; LINGUISTICS; MASS SCREENING; PATIENT SELECTION; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL CLASS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 77951654442     PISSN: 0008350X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Halcomb EJ, Gholizadeh L, DiGiacomo M, Phillips J, Davidson PM. Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups. J Clin Nurs 2007;16(6):1000-1011
2. Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA 2004;291(22):2720-2726 (Pubitemid 38725421)
3. Flaskerud JH, Nyamathi AM. Attaining gender and ethnic diversity in health intervention research: cultural responsiveness versus resource provision. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2000;22(4):1-15.
4. Meyer J. Qualitative research in health care. Using qualitative methods in health related action research. BMJ 2000;320(7228):178-181
5. Waterman H, Tillen D, Dickson R, de Koning K. Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technol Assess 2001;5(23):iii-157.
6. Gittelsohn J; International Nutrition Foundation. Rapid Assessment Procedures (RAP): ethnographic methods to investigate women's health. Boston, MA: International Nutrition Foundation; 1998.
7. Alvarez RA, Vasquez E, Mayorga CC, Feaster DJ, Mitrani VB. Increasing minority research participation through community organization outreach. West J Nurs Res 2006;28(5):541-60, discussion 561-563
8. Moreno-John G, Gachie A, Fleming CM, Nápoles-Springer A, Mutran E, Manson SM, et al. Ethnic minority older adults participating in clinical research: developing trust. J Aging Health 2004;16(5 Suppl):93S-123S. (Pubitemid 39362333)
9. Ruppenthal L, Tuck J, Gagnon AJ. Enhancing research with migrant women through focus groups. West J Nurs Res 2005;27(6):735-754 (Pubitemid 41412345)
10. National Council on Ethics in Human Research. Section 2: free and informed consent. In: Tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa, ON: National Council on Ethics in Human Research; 2007. Available from: www.ncehr-cnerh.org/en/. Accessed 2010 Feb 23.
11. Mann A, Hoke MM, Williams JC. Lessons learned: research with rural Mexican-American women. Nurs Outlook 2005;53(3):141-146 (Pubitemid 40884695)
12. Adderley-Kelly B, Green PM. Strategies for successful conduct of research with low-income African American populations. Nurs Outlook 2005;53(3):147-152 (Pubitemid 40884696)