Shotgun proteomics: Concept, key points and data mining

Expert Review of Proteomics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 5-7

  Matallana Surget, Sabine ^a   Leroy, Baptiste ^a   Wattiez, Ruddy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE; PROTEINASE;

CATION EXCHANGE; COMPLEX FORMATION; EDITORIAL; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEOMICS; REVERSED PHASE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEOMICS; SPECIMEN HANDLING;

EID: 77951642860     PISSN: 14789450     EISSN: 17448387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/epr.09.101     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. Barnea E, Sorkin R, Ziv T et al. Evaluation of prefractionation methods as a preparatory step for multidimensional based chromatography of serum proteins. Proteomics 5, 3367-3375 (2005).
2. Chong PK, Wright PC. Identifcation and characterization of the Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 proteome. J. Proteome Res. 4, 1789-1798 (2005).
3. Gan CS, Reardon KF, Wright PC. Comparison of protein and peptide prefractionation methods for the shotgun proteomic analysis of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Proteomics 5, 2468-2478 (2005).
4. Mastroleo F, Leroy B, Van Houdt R et al. Shotgun proteome analysis of Rhodospirillum rubrum S1H: integrating data from gel-free and gel-based peptides fractionation methods. J. Proteome Res. 8(5), 2530-2541 (2009).
5. Vaezzadeh AR, Deshusses JM, Waridel P et al. Accelerated digestion for high-throughput proteomics analysis of whole bacterial proteomes. J. Microbiol. Methods 80(1), 56-62 (2010).
6. Hu S, Xie Y, Ramachandran P et al. Large-scale identifcation of proteins in human salivary proteome by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis-mass spectrometry. Proteomics 5(6), 1714-1728 (2005).
7. Wolff S, Otto A, Albrecht D et al. Gel-free and gel-based proteomics in Bacillus subtilis, a comparative study. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 1183-1192 (2006).
8. Keller M, Hettich R. Environmental proteomics: a paradigm shift in characterizing microbial activities at the molecular level. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73(1), 62-70 (2009).
9. Nesvizhskii AI, Aebersold R. Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1419-1440 (2005).
10. Alves P, Arnold RJ, Novotny MV et al. Advancements in protein identifcation from shotgun proteomics using predicted peptide detectability. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 12, 409-420 (2007).
11. Zhang B, Chambers MC, Tabb DL. Proteomic parsimony through bipartite graph analysis improves accuracy and transparency. J. Proteome Res. 6, 3549-3557 (2007).
12. Li YF, Arnold RJ, Li Y et al. A Bayesian approach to protein inference problem in shotgun proteomics J. Comput. Biol. 16(8), 1183-1193 (2009).
13. Cox J, Mann M. Computational principles of determining and improving mass precision and accuracy for proteome measurements in an Orbitrap. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20(8), 1477-1485 (2009).