Spatial metaphorand the logic of visual representation

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-96-02, Issue , 1996, Pages 56-59

  Gattis, Merideth ^a  

^a MaxPlanck Institute for Psychological Research   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ICONICS; REASONING MAP; REASONING TASKS; SIMPLE++; SPATIAL STRUCTURE; VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS;

COMPUTER CIRCUITS;

EID: 77951626181     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Driver, G. R. (1976). Semitic writing: Frompictographto alphabet. London:OxfordUniversity Press.
2. Fenk, A. (1994). Spatial metaphorsand logical pictures. In W. Schnotz & R. W. Kulhavy(Eds.), Comprehensionof graphics (pp. 43-62). Amsterdam:Elsevier Science.
3. Gattis, M. (manuscript in preparation). Mappingfeatures andrelations in visual reasoning.
4. Gattis, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Mappingconceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. Journalof Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,and Cognition, 22 (1), 231-239.
5. Lindsay, R. K. (1988). Imagesand inference. Cognition, 29, 229-250.
6. Tversky, B., Kugeimass,S., &Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmentaltrends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515-557.