Comparing memory for handwriting versus typing

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 3, Issue , 2009, Pages 1744-1747

  Smoker, Timothy J ^a   Murphy, Carrie E ^a   Rockwell, Alison K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING; PHYSICAL THERAPY;

COMPLEX TASK; ELECTRONIC NOTE TAKINGS; RECENT TRENDS;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 77951611433     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1518/107118109x12524444081755     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
2. Florida Department of Education. (2007). Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT). Tallahassee, FL: Author.
3. Hulme, C. (1979). The interaction of visual and motor memory for graphic forms following tracing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 249-261.
4. Hylan, J. P. (1910). Review of an experimental study of writing movements. Psychological Review, 10(4), 457.
5. Longcamp, M., Boucard, C., Gilhodes, J., Anton, J., Roth, M., Nazarian, B., & Velay, J. (2008). Learning through hand- or typewriting influences visual recognition of new graphic shapes: Behavioral and functional imaging evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(5), 802-815. (Pubitemid 351657337)
6. Longcamp, M., Zerbato-Poudou, M. & Velay, J. (2005). The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta Psychologica, 119, 67-79. (Pubitemid 40491596)
7. Naka, M. (1998). Repeated writing facilitates children's memory for pseudocharacters and foreign letters. Memory and Cognition, 26, 804-809.