Vibro-acoustic modulation utilizing a swept probing signal for robust crack detection

Structural Health Monitoring

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 257-267

  Yoder, Nathanael C ^a   Adams, Douglas E ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Baseline free damage detection; Generalized extreme value statistics; Nonlinear crack detection environmental variability; Nonlinear SHM; Vibro acoustic modulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951607895     PISSN: 14759217     EISSN: 17413168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1475921710365261     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adams, D.E. (2007). Health Monitoring of Structural Materials and Components: Methods with Applications, New York: Wiley.
2. Sohn, H. (2007). Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London - Series A, 365(1851), 539-560.
3. Alampalli, S. (1998). Influence of in-service environment on modal parameters. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC-XVI), Santa Barbara, California, Vol. 3243, pp. 111-116.
4. Cornwell, P., Farrar, C.R., Doebling, S.W. and Sohn, H. (1999). Environmental variability of modal properties. Experimental Techniques, 39(6), 45-48.
5. Peeters, B. (2001). One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge: environmental effects versus damage events. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30(2), 149-171.
6. Sohn, H., Dzwonczyk, M., Straser, E.G., Kiremidjian, A.S., Law, K.H. and Meng, T. (1999). An experimental study of temperature effect on modal parameters of the Alamosa Canyon Bridge. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28(8), 879-897.
7. Sohn, H., Farrar, C.R., Hunter, N.F. and Worden, K. (2001). Structural health monitoring using statistical pattern recognition techniques. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 123(4), 706-712.
8. Yan, A.M., Kerschen, G., De Boe, P. and Golinval, J.C. (2005). Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions - part I: a linear analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 19(4), 847-864.
9. Yan, A.M., Kerschen, G., De Boe, P. and Golinval, J.C. (2005). Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions - part II: local PCA for non-linear cases. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 19(4), 865-880.
10. Sohn, H., Worden, K. and Farrar, C.R. (2002). Statistical damage classification under changing environmental and operational conditions. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 13(9), 561-574.
11. Friswell, M.I. (2007). Damage identification using inverse methods. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London - Series A, 365(1851), 393-410.
12. Farrar, C.R., Worden, K., Todd, M.D., Park, G., Nichols, J., Adams, D.E., Bement, M.T. and Farinholt, K. (2007). Nonlinear System Identification for Damage Detection. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
13. Yoder, N.C., Adams, D.E. and Triplett, M. (2008). Multidimensional sensing for impact load and damage evaluation in a carbon filament wound canister. Materials Evaluation, 66(7), 756-763.
14. Sutin, A.M. and Nazarov, V.E. (1995). Nonlinear acoustic methods of crack diagnostics. Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics, 38(3-4), 169-187.
15. Van den Abeele, K.E.A., Johnson, P.A. and Sutin, A. (2000). Nonlinear elastic wave spectroscopy (NEWS) techniques to discern material damage, part I: nonlinear wave modulation spectroscopy (NWMS). Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, 12(1), 17-30.
16. Zaitsev, V.Y., Gusev, V. and Castagnède, B. (2002). Observation of the 'Luxemburg-Gorky effect' for elastic waves. Ultrasonics, 40(1-8), 627-631.
17. Zaitsev, V.Y., Sutin, A.M., Belyaeva, I.Y. and Nazarov, V.E. (1995). Nonlinear interaction of acoustical waves due to cracks and its possible usage for cracks detection. Journal of Vibration and Control, 1(3), 335-344.
18. Donskoy, D., Sutin, A. and Ekimov, A. (2001). Nonlinear acoustic interaction on contact interfaces and its use for nondestructive testing. NDT&E International, 34, 231-238.
19. Zaitsev, V. and Sas, P. (2000). Nonlinear response of a weakly damaged metal sample: a dissipative modulation mechanism of vibro-acoustic interaction. Journal of Vibration and Control, 6(6), 803-822.
20. Parsons, Z. and Staszewski, W.J. (2006). Nonlinear acoustics with low-profile piezoceramic excitation for crack detection in metallic structures. Smart Materials and Structures, 15(4), 1110-1118.
21. Kim, J.Y., Yakovlev, V.A. and Rokhlin, S.I. (2004). Surface acoustic wave modulation on a partially closed fatigue crack. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(5), 1961-1972.
22. Zaitsev, V. and Sas, P. (2000). Nonlinear response of a weakly damaged metal sample: a dissipative modulation mechanism of vibro-acoustic interaction. Journal of Vibration and Control, 6(6), 803-822.
23. Zaitsev, V.Y., Sas, P. and Wevers, M. (2001). Nonlinear modulation methods of structural damage detection based on dissipative nonlinear effects. In: Proceedings of the International Seminar on Modal Analysis, Leuven, Belgium, Vol. 25(1), pp. 233-242.
24. Zaitsev, V.Y., Gusev, V. and Castagnède, B. (2002). Observation of the 'Luxemburg-Gorky effect' for elastic waves. Ultrasonics, 40(1-8), 627-631.
25. Zaitsev, V.Y. (2003). Acoustic wave-crack interaction: mechanisms of nonlinear elastic and inelastic dynamics at different time-scales. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Ultrasonics, Paris, France, pp. 113-120.
26. Sutin, A.M. and Donskoy, D.D. (1998). Vibro-acoustic modulation nondestructive evaluation technique. In: Nondestructive Evaluation of Aging Aircraft, Airports, and Aerospace Hardware II, Vol. 3397, pp. 226-237, Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
27. Didenkulov, I.N., Sutin, A.M., Ekimov, A.E. and Kazakov, V.V. (2000). Interaction of sound and vibrations in concrete with cracks. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, Nonlinear Acoustics at the Turn of the Millennium, göttingen, Germany, Vol. 524, pp. 279-282.
28. Duffour, P., Morbidini, M. and Cawley, P. (2006). A study of the virbo-acoustic modulation technique for the detection of cracks in metals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1463-1475.
29. Courtney, C.R.P., Drinkwater, B.W., Neild, S.A. and Wilcox, P.D. (2008). Factors affecting the ultrasonic intermodulation crack detection technique using bispectral analysis. NDT&E International, 41(3), 223-234.
30. Donskoy, D., Sutin, A. and Ekimov, A. (2001). Nonlinear acoustic interaction on contact interfaces and its use for nondestructive testing. NDT&E International, 34(4), 231-238.
31. Johnson, T.J. and Adams, D.E. (2002). Transmissibility as a differential indicator of structural damage. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 124(4), 634-641.
32. Kess, H.R. and Adams, D.E. (2007). Investigation of operational and environmental variability effects on damage detection algorithms in a woven composite plate. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(6), 2394-2405.
33. Savitzky, A. and Golay, M.J.E. (1964). Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analytical Chemistry, 36(8), 1627-1639.
34. Park, H.W. and Sohn, H. (2006). Parameter estimation of the generalized extreme value distribution for structural health monitoring. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 21(4), 366-376.