Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis by deconvolution of internal standard

BMC Molecular Biology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Hirakawa, Yasuko ^a   Medh, Rheem D ^a   Metzenberg, Stan ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEXAMETHASONE; ACTIN;

ACCURACY; AMPLICON; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA TEMPLATE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LEUKEMIA CELL LINE; LYMPHATIC LEUKEMIA; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STANDARD; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ACTINS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; DEXAMETHASONE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE FREQUENCY; HUMANS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 77951599057     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2199-11-30     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. VanGuilder HD, Vrana KE, Freeman WM. Twenty-five years of quantitative PCR for gene expression analysis. Biotechniques 2008, 44:619-626. 10.2144/000112776, 18474036.
2. Cikos S, Koppel J. Transformation of real-time PCR fluorescence data to target gene quantity. Anal Biochem 2009, 384:1-10. 10.1016/j.ab.2008.08.031, 18812161.
3. Wittwer CT, Herrmann MG, Moss AA, Rasmussen RP. Continuous fluorescence monitoring of rapid cycle DNA amplification. Biotechniques 1997, 22:130-131. 134-138.
4. Morrison TB, Weis JJ, Wittwer CT. Quantification of low-copy transcripts by continuous SYBR Green I monitoring during amplification. Biotechniques 1998, 24:954-958. 960, 962.
5. Cikos S, Bukovská A, Koppel J. Relative quantification of mRNA: comparison of methods currently used for real-time PCR data analysis. BMC Mol Biol 2007, 8:113. 10.1186/1471-2199-8-113, 2235892, 18093344.
6. Bustin SA, Benes V, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR -- a perspective. J Mol Endocrinol 2005, 34:597-601. 10.1677/jme.1.01755, 15956331.
7. Peirson SN, Butler JN, Foster RG. Experimental validation of novel and conventional approaches to quantitative real-time PCR data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:e73. 10.1093/nar/gng073, 167648, 12853650.
8. Liu W, Saint DA. A new quantitative method of real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay based on simulation of polymerase chain reaction kinetics. Anal Biochem 2002, 302:52-59. 10.1006/abio.2001.5530, 11846375.
9. Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Deprez RH, Moorman AF. Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci Lett 2003, 339:62-66. 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)01423-4, 12618301.
10. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001, 29:e45. 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45, 55695, 11328886.
11. Rutledge RG, Stewart D. A kinetic-based sigmoidal model for the polymerase chain reaction and its application to high-capacity absolute quantitative real-time PCR. BMC Biotechnol 2008, 8:47. 10.1186/1472-6750-8-47, 2397388, 18466619.
12. Liu W, Saint DA. Validation of a quantitative method for real time PCR kinetics. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2002, 294:347-353. 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00478-3, 12051718.
13. Rutledge RG. Sigmoidal curve-fitting redefines quantitative real-time PCR with the prospective of developing automated high-throughput applications. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:e178. 10.1093/nar/gnh177, 545475, 15601990.
14. Skern R, Frost P, Nilsen F. Relative transcript quantification by quantitative PCR: roughly right or precisely wrong?. BMC Mol Biol 2005, 6:10. 10.1186/1471-2199-6-10, 1090581, 15854230.
15. Karlen Y, McNair A, Perseguers S, Mazza C, Mermod N. Statistical significance of quantitative PCR. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:131. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-131, 1868764, 17445280.
16. Priceman SJ, Kirzner JD, Nary LJ, Morris D, Shankar DB, Sakamoto KM, Medh RD. Calcium-dependent upregulation of E4BP4 expression correlates with glucocorticoid-evoked apoptosis of human leukemic CEM cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006, 344:491-499. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.169, 2763529, 16630563.
17. Medh RD, Webb MS, Miller AL, Johnson BH, Fofanov Y, Li T, Wood TG, Luxon BA, Thompson EB. Gene expression profile of human lymphoid CEM cells sensitive and resistant to glucocorticoid-evoked apoptosis. Genomics 2003, 81:543-555. 10.1016/S0888-7543(03)00045-4, 2777808, 12782123.
18. Gilliland G, Perrin S, Blanchard K, Bunn HF. Analysis of cytokine mRNA and DNA: detection and quantitation by competitive polymerase chain reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990, 87:2725-2729. 10.1073/pnas.87.7.2725, 53763, 2181447.
19. Gibson UE, Heid CA, Williams PM. A novel method for real time quantitative RT-PCR. Genome Res 1996, 6:995-1001. 10.1101/gr.6.10.995, 8908519.
20. Sjöling A, Walentinsson A, Nordlander C, Karlsson A, Behboudi A, Samuelson E, Levan G, Röhme D. Assessment of allele dosage at polymorphic microsatellite loci displaying allelic imbalance in tumors by means of quantitative competitive-polymerase chain reaction. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2005, 157:97-103. 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2004.06.013, 15721629.
21. Sen K, Schable NA, Lye DJ. Development of an internal control for evaluation and standardization of a quantitative PCR assay for detection of Helicobacter pylori in drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007, 73:7380-7387. 10.1128/AEM.00687-07, 2168203, 17905876.
22. Cottrez F, Auriault C, Capron A, Groux H. Quantitative PCR: validation of the use of a multispecific internal control. Nucleic Acids Res 1994, 22:2712-2713. 10.1093/nar/22.13.2712, 308233, 8041636.
23. Tichopad A, Dilger M, Schwarz G, Pfaffl MW. Standardized determination of real-time PCR efficiency from a single reaction set-up. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:e122. 10.1093/nar/gng122, 219490, 14530455.
24. Rutledge RG, Stewart D. Critical evaluation of methods used to determine amplification efficiency refutes the exponential character of real-time PCR. BMC Mol Biol 2008, 9:96. 10.1186/1471-2199-9-96, 2587475, 18973660.