Interactive effects of backup behavior and spatial abilities in the prediction of teammate workload using multiple unmanned vehicles

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 2, Issue , 2008, Pages 995-999

  Fincannon, Thomas D ^a   Evans, A William ^a   Jentsch, Florian ^a   Keebler, Joseph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERACTIVE EFFECT; NAVIGATION SUPPORT; OPERATOR WORKLOAD; SPATIAL ABILITIES; SPATIAL ORIENTATIONS; SPATIAL VISUALIZATION; TEAM PROCESS; UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLES;

ERGONOMICS; FLIGHT DYNAMICS; FORECASTING; GROUND VEHICLES; NAVIGATION; REMOTELY OPERATED VEHICLES; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV); VISUALIZATION;

INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS;

EID: 77951590958     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Burke, J. L., & Murphy, R. R. (2004). Human-robot interaction in US AR technical search: Two heads are better than one, Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2004. ROMAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 307-312).
2. Chadwick, R. (2005). The impacts of multiple robots and displays views: An urban search and rescue simulation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 387-391.
3. Chadwick, R. (2006). Operating multiple semi-autonomous robots: Monitoring, responding, & detecting. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 329-333.
4. Chen, J., Durlach, P., Sloan, J., & Bowens, L. (in press). Human robot interaction in the context of simulated route reconnaissance missions. Military Psychology.
5. Diaz, D., & Sims, V. (2003). Augmenting virtual environments: The influence of spatial ability on learning from integrated displays. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 191-212.
6. Educational Testing Service (2005). Cube Comparison Test. Princeton, NJ: ETS.
7. Educational Testing Service (1975). Card Rotations Test.
8. Guilford, J. P., & Zimmerman, W. S. (1981). Manual of instructions and interpretations for the Guilford-Zimmerman Aptitude Survey (revised edition). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.
9. Hegarty, M. & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial ability. In P. Shah &A. Miyake (Eds.), Tire Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking (pp. 121-169). Cambridge University Press.
10. Ososky, S., Evans, A. W., III, Keebler, J. R., & Jentsch, F. (2007). Using Scale Simulation and Virtual Environments to Study Human-Robot Teams. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of Augmented Cognition International (pp. 183-189). Baltimore, Maryland.
11. Rehfeld, S. (2006). The impact of mental transfonmtion training across levels of automation on spatial awareness in human-robot interaction. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.
12. Rehfeld, S., Jentsch, F., Curtis, M., & Fincannon, T. (2005). Collaborative teamwork with unmanned vehicles in military missions, 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Vol. 11): MIRA Digital Publishing (CD-ROM).
13. Tannenbaum, S., Beard, R., & Salas, E. (1992). Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 117-153). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.