Using data-display networks for exploratory data analysis in phylogenetic studies

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1044-1057

  Morrison, David A ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

EDA; Phylogenetic networks; Splits networks

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA DETERMINATION; GENE SEQUENCE; HOMOPLASY; HORIZONTAL GENE TRANSFER; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

BASE SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 77951586581     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp309     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Posada D. 2005. ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 21:2104-2105.
2. Addario-Berry L, Hallett M, Lagergren J. 2003. Towards identifying lateral gene transfer events. Pac Symp Biocomp. 8:279-290.
3. Ayling SC, Brown TA. 2008. Novel methodology for construction and pruning of quasi-median networks. BMC Bioinformatics 9:115.
4. Ballard JWO. 2000. When one is not enough: introgression of mitochondrial DNA in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 17:1126-1130.
5. Bandelt H-J. 1994. Phylogenetic networks. Verhandl Naturwiss Vereins Hamburg. 34:51-71.
6. Bandelt H-J. 2005. Exploring reticulate patterns in DNA sequence data. In: Bakker FT, Chatrou LW, Gravendeel B, Pelser PB, editors. Plant species-level systematics: new perspectives on pattern and process. Königstein (Germany): Koeltz. p. 245-269.
7. Bandelt H-J, Dress AWM. 1992. Split decomposition: a new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1:242-252.
8. Bandelt H-J, Dress AWM. 1993. A relational approach to split decomposition. In: Opitz O, Lausen B, Klar R, editors. Information and classification. Berlin (Germany): Springer. p. 123-131.
9. Bandelt H-J, Macauley V, Richards M. 2000. Median networks: speedy construction and greedy reduction, one simulation, and two case studies from human mtDNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 16:8-28.
10. Behrens JT, Yu CH. 2003. Exploratory data analysis. In: Schinka JA, Velicer WF, editors. Handbook of psychology, vol.2: research methods in psychology. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons. p. 33-64.
11. Bergsten J. 2005. A review of long-branch attraction. Cladistics. 21:163-193.
12. Bryant D, Moulton V. 2002. NeighborNet: an agglomerative method for the construction of planar phylogenetic networks. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2452:375-391.
13. Bryant D, Moulton V. 2004. Neighbor-Net: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Mol Biol Evol. 21:255-265.
14. Comes HP, Abbott RJ. 2001. Molecular phylogeography, reticulation, and lineage sorting in Mediterranean Senecio sect. Senecio (Asteraceae). Evolution 55:1943-1962.
15. Cooper AS, Lalueza-Fox C, Anderson S, Rambaut A, Austin J, Ward R. 2001. Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two extinct moas clarify ratite evolution. Nature 409: 704-707.
16. Croan DG, Morrison DA, Ellis JT. 1997. Evolution of the genus Leishmania revealed by comparison of DNA and RNA poly-merase gene sequences. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 89:149-159.
17. Donoghue MJ, Baldwin BG, Li J, Winkworth RC. 2004. Viburnum phylogeny based on chloroplast trnK intron and nuclear ribosomal ITS DNA sequences. Syst Bot. 29:188-198.
18. Ellison AM. 2001. Exploratory data analysis and graphic display. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J, editors. Design and analysis of ecological experiments, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 37-62.
19. Gemeinholzer B. 2008. Phylogenetic networks. In: Junker BH, Schreiber F, editors. Analysis of biological networks. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Interscience. p. 255-282.
20. Goremykin VV, Holland B, Hirsch-Ernst KI, Hellwig FH. 2005. Analysis of Acorus calamus chloroplast genome and its phylogenetic implications. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1813-1822.
21. Grant T, Kluge AG. 2003. Data exploration in phylogenetic inference: scientific, heuristic, or neither. Cladistics. 19:379-418.
22. Hillis DM, Wilcox TP. 2005. Phylogeny of the New World true frogs (Rana). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 34:299-314.
23. Höglund J, Morrison DA, Mattsson JG, Engström A. 2006. Population genetics of the bovine/cattle lungworm (Dictyocaulus viviparus) based on mtDNA and AFLP marker techniques. Parasitology 133:89-99.
24. Holland BR, Delsuc F, Moulton V. 2005. Visualizing conflicting evolutionary hypotheses in large collections of trees: using consensus networks to study the origins of placentals and hexapods. Syst Biol. 54:66-76.
25. Holland BR, Huber KT, Moulton V, Lockhart PJ. 2004. Using consensus networks to visualize contradictory evidence for species phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1459-1461.
26. Holland BR, Jermiin LS, Moulton V. 2006. Improved consensus network techniques for genome-scale phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol. 23:848-855.
27. Holland B, Moulton V. 2003. Consensus networks: a method for visualizing incompatibilities in collections of trees. Lect Notes Bioinform. 2812:165-176.
28. Huson DH. 1998. SplitsTree: analyzing and visualizing evolutionary data. Bioinformatics 14:68-73.
29. Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 23:254-267.
30. Huson DH, Dezulian T, Klöpper T, Steel MA. 2004. Phylogenetic super-networks from partial trees. IEEE/ACM Trans Computat Biol Bioinform. 1:151-158. (Pubitemid 40325592)
31. Huson DH, Kloepper TH. 2005. Computing recombination networks from binary sequences. Bioinformatics 21:ii159-ii165.
32. Huson DH, Klöpper TH. 2007. Beyond galled trees\decomposition and computation of galled networks. Lect Notes Bioinform. 4453:211-225.
33. Huson DH, Klöpper T, Lockhart PJ, Steel MA. 2005. Reconstruction of reticulate networks from gene trees. Lect Notes Bioinform. 3500:233-249.
34. Huson DH, Rupp R, Berry V, Gambette P, Paul C. 2009. Computing galled networks from real data. Bioinformatics 25:i85-i93.
35. Huson DH, Steel MA, Whitfield J. 2006. Reducing distortion in phylogenetic networks. Lect Notes Bioinform. 4175:150-161.
36. Jermiin LS, Ho SYW, Ababneh F, Robinson J, Larkum AWD. 2004. The biasing effect of compositional heterogeneity on phy-logenetic estimates may be underestimated. Syst Biol. 53: 638-643.
37. Kennedy M, Holland BR, Gray RD, Spencer HG. 2005. Untangling long branches: identifying conflicting phylogenetic signals using spectral analysis, neighbor-net, and consensus networks. Syst Biol. 54:620-633.
38. Makarenkov V, Kevorkov D, Legendre P. 2006. Phylogenetic network construction approaches. In: Arora DK, Berka RM, Singh GB, editors. Applied mycology and biotechnology, vol.6: bioinfor-matics. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 61-97.
39. McBreen K, Lockhart PJ. 2006. Reconstructing reticulate evolutionary histories of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 11:398-404.
40. Morrison DA. 1996. Phylogenetic tree-building. Int J Parasitol. 26:589-617.
41. Morrison DA. 2005. Networks in phylogenetic analysis: new tools for population biology. Int J Parasitol. 35:567-582.
42. Morrison DA. 2010. Phylogenetic networks in systematic biology (and elsewhere). In: Mohan RM, editor. Research advances in systematic biology. Trivandrum (India): Global Research Network.
43. Nakhleh L. 2010. Evolutionary phylogenetic networks: models and issues. In: Heath LS, Ramakrishnan N, editors. The problem solving handbook for computational biology and bioinformatics. New York: Springer.
44. Nakhleh L, Sun J, Warnow T, Linder CR, Moret BME, Tholse A. 2003. Towards the development of computational tools for evaluating phylogenetic network reconstruction methods. Pac Symp Biocomp. 8:315-326.
45. Pecher WT, Robledo JAF, Vasta GR. 2004. Identification of a second rRNA gene unit in the Perkinsus andrewsi genome. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 51:234-245.
46. Philip GK, Creevey CJ, McInerney JO. 2005. The Opisthokonta and the Ecdysozoa may not be clades: stronger support for the grouping of plant and animal than for animal and fungi, and stronger support for the Coelomata than Ecdysozoa. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1175-1184.
47. Philippe H, Douady CJ. 2003. Horizontal gene transfer and phylogenetics. Curr Opin Microbiol. 6:498-505.
48. Posada D, Crandall KA. 2001. Intraspecific gene genealogies: trees grafting into networks. Trends Ecol Evol. 16:37-45.
49. Reeves PA, Richards CM. 2007. Distinguishing terminal mono-phyletic groups from reticulate taxa: performance of phenetic, tree-based, and network procedures. Syst Biol. 56:302-320.
50. Takahashi K, Terai Y, Nishida M, Okada N. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships and ancient incomplete lineage sorting among cichlid fishes in Lake Tanganyika as revealed by analysis of the insertion of retroposons. Mol Biol Evol. 18:2057-2066.
51. Troell K, Engström A, Morrison DA, Mattsson JG, Höglund J. 2006. Global patterns reveal strong population structure in Haemon-chus contortus, a nematode parasite of domesticated ruminants. Int J Parasitol. 36:1305-1316.
52. Tukey JW. 1977. Exploratory data analysis. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley.
53. Vriesendorp B, Bakker FT. 2005. Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in angiosperms: what can we do? Taxon. 54:593-604.
54. Wägele JW, Mayer C. 2007. Visualizing differences in phylogenetic information content of alignments and distinction of three classes of long-branch effects. BMC Evol Biol. 7:147.