Measuring the workload of sustained attention: Further evaluation of the Multiple Reources Questionnaire

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 2, Issue , 2008, Pages 1209-1213

  Finomore, Victor S ^a   Shaw, Tyler H ^a   Warm, Joel S ^a   Matthews, Gerald ^a   Riley, Michael A ^a   Boles, David B ^b   Weldon, Dave ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^c JXT Application Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERGONOMICS; SURVEYS;

AUDITORY STIMULI; EXPERIMENTAL FACTORS; MENTAL WORKLOAD; MULTIPLE RESOURCES; SENSORY MODALITY; SUSTAINED ATTENTION; TASK DEMAND; VISUAL SIGNALS;

NASA;

EID: 77951586153     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193120805201812     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Boles, D. B., & Adair, L. P. (2001). The multiple resources questionnaire (MRQ). Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 45, 1790-1794.
2. Boles, D. B., Bursk, J.H., Phillips, J.B., & Perdelwitz, J.R. (2007). Predicting dual-task performance with the multiple resources questionnaire (MRQ). Human Factors, 49, 32-45.
3. Caggiano, D. M., & Parasuraman, R. (2004). The role of memory representation in the vigilance decrement. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 932-937.
4. Finomore, V.S., Warm, J.S., Marthews, G., Riley, M.A., Dember, W.N., Shaw, T.H., et al. (2006). Measuring the workload of sustained attention. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50, 1614-1618.
5. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload, (pp. 139-183). Oxford, UK: North-Holland.
6. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1996). Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: Vigilance and task complexity effects. Human Factors, 38, 311-322.
9. Nachreiner, F., & Hanecke, K. (1992). Vigilance. In A.P. Smith & D.M. Jones (Eds.). Handbook of human performance, Vol 3: State and rraif(pp. 261-288). San Diego, CA, Academic Press.
10. O'Donnell, R. D., & Eggemeier, F. T. (1986). Workload assessment methodology. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance, vol. 2: Cognitive processes and performance, (pp. 41-1-42-49). New York: Wiley.
11. Stevens, S. S. (1959). Cross-modality validation of subjective scales for loudness, vibration, and electric shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57,201-209.
12. Szalma, J.L., Warm, J.S., Matthews G., Dember, W.N., Weiler, E.M., Meier, A., & Eggemeier, F.T. (2004). Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance, workload, and stress in sustained attention. Human Factors, 46, 219-233.
13. Wann, J. S, Matthews, G., & Finomore, V. S. (2008). Workload, stress, and vigilance. In P. A. Hancock & J. L Szalma (Eds.), Performance under stress (pp. 115-141). Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
14. Wann, J. S., & Jcrison, H. J. (1984). The psychophysics of vigilance. In J. S. Wann (Ed.), Sustained attention in human performance (pp. 15-59). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
15. rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.