Prospective memory in everyday tasks

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 1, Issue , 2009, Pages 590-594

  Holbrook, Jon ^a   Dismukes, Key ^b  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ENGINEERING; PHYSICAL THERAPY;

DIARY STUDY; IMPROVE PERFORMANCE; LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS; MEMORY PERFORMANCE; NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS; REAL-WORLD; SITUATIONAL FACTORS;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 77951561531     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1518/107118109x12524442635941     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Cohen, A. L. & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). The cost of remembering to remember: Cognitive load and implementation intentions influence ongoing task performance. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Dodhia, R. M. & Dismukes, R. K. (2009). Interruptions create prospective memory tasks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(1), 73-89.
3. Ellis, J. (1996). Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework for research. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 1-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Ellis, J. A. & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1993). Recollecting naturally-occurring intentions: A study of cognitive and affective factors. Memory 1(2), 107-126.
5. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.
6. Kvavilashvili, L. & Ellis, J. A. (1996). Varieties of intention: Some distinctions and classifications. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 1-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Kvavilashvili, L. & Fisher, L. (2007). Is time-based prospective remembering mediated by self-initiated rehearsals? Role of incidental cues, ongoing activity, age, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1), 112-132.
8. Loukopoulos, L. D., Dismukes, R. K., & Barshi, I. (2009). The Multitasking Myth: Handling Complexity in Real-World Operations. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
9. McDaniel, M. A. & Einstein, G. O. (2007). Prospective Memory: An Overview and Synthesis of an Emerging Field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., & Butler, K. M. (2008). Implementation intentions facilitate prospective memory under high attention demands. Memory and Cognition, 36(4), 716-724.
11. Reason, J. (1990). Human Error. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Smith, R.E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 347-361.