A post-disaster mobility model for delay tolerant networking

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 2785-2796

  Uddin, Yusuf S ^a   Nicol, David M ^a   Abdelzaher, Tarek F ^a   Kravets, Robin H ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION RANGE; DELAY TOLERANT NETWORKING; END-TO-END CONNECTIVITY; MESSAGE EXCHANGE; MOBILITY MODEL; NETWORK DEVICES; NEW MODEL; OPPORTUNISTIC NETWORKS; POST-DISASTER COMMUNICATIONS; SERVICE CHARACTERISTICS; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK; VEHICLE MOVEMENTS;

BLOCK CODES;

MODELS;

EID: 77951550493     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2009.5429249     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Burgess, J., B. Gallagher, D. Jensen, and B. N. Levine. 2006. MaxProp: Routing for vehicle-based disruption-tolerant networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2006. Barcelona, Spain.
2. DTNRG 2005. Delay-tolernat network. 〈www.dtnrg.org〉 [Accessed August 13, 2009].
3. Ekman, F., A. Keränen, J. Karvo, and J. Ott. 2008.Working day movement model. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGMOBILE workshop on Mobility models, MobilityModels '08, 33-40. Hong Kong, China.
4. Hong, X., M. Gerla, G. Pei, and C. Chiang. 1999. A group mobility model for ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (MSWiM). Seattle, Washington, USA.
5. Hsu, W. J., T. Spyropoulos, K. Psounis, and A. Helmy. 2007. Modeling time-variant user mobility in wireless mobile networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2007, 758-766. Alaska, USA.
6. ICS 2001. National incident management system. Available via 〈http://www.training.fema.gov〉 [Accessed August 13, 2009].
7. Johnson, D., and D. Maltz. 1996. Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. Mobile Computing:153-181.
8. Keränen, A., and J. Ott. 2007. Increasing reality for DTN protocol simulations. Technical report, Helsinki University of Technology. 〈http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/tutkimus/dtn/theone/〉 [Accessed August 13, 2009].
9. Musolesi, M., and C. Mascolo. 2006. A community based mobility model for ad hoc network research. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/SIGMOBILE International Workshop on Multi-hop Ad Hoc Networks: from theory to reality (REALMAN'06). Florence, Italy.
10. Nelson, S., A. Harris III, and R. Kravets. 2007. Event-driven, role-based mobility in disaster recovery networks. In Proceedings of the MobiCom workshop CHANTS 2007, 27-34. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. (Pubitemid 351203611)
11. NRF 2001. National Response Framework. Available via 〈http://www. fema.gov/emergency/nrf/〉 [Accessed August 13, 2009].
12. NRF-Docs 2001. NRF documents. Available via 〈http://www.fema.gov/ pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-core.pdf〉 [Accessed August 13, 2009].
13. Rhee, I., M. Shin, S. Hong, K. Lee, and S. Chong. 2007. On the levy-walk nature of human mobility: Do humans walk like monkeys? Technical report, North Carolina State University, North Carolina, USA.
14. Sanchez, M. 2002. Mobility models.Available via 〈http://www.disca. upv.es/misan/mobmodel.htm〉 [Accessed August 13, 2009].
15. Sanchez, M., and P. Manzoni. 2001. Anejos: A java based simulator for ad-hoc networks. Future Generation Computer Systems 17:573-583. (Pubitemid 32875230)
16. Scenes 2001. National Planning Scenarios. Available via 〈http://www.oregon.gov/OMD/OEM/docs/dom-prep/fed-support/ national-planning-scenarios.pdf〉 [Accessed August 13, 2009].