Wave energy and public opinion in the state of Oregon, U.S.A.

MTS/IEEE Biloxi - Marine Technology for Our Future: Global and Local Challenges, OCEANS 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Stefanovich, Maria ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENERGY EXTRACTION; ENERGY SUPPLIES; MARINE LIFE; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; POTENTIAL PROBLEMS; PUBLIC OPINIONS; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; WAVE ENERGY; WAVE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT;

ENERGY POLICY; MARINE ENGINEERING; OCEANOGRAPHY; SURVEYS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WAVE ENERGY CONVERSION; WAVE POWER;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

EID: 77951545373     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (52)

1. EPRI, 2004. Survey and characterization of potential offshore wave energy sites in Oregon, in: Institute, E.P.R. (Ed.), EPRI. E21/EPRI WP-OR- 003, May 17, 2004. Electrical Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
2. President R. Nixon, State of the Union Address, January 30 1974. Available at: http://www.thisnation.com/library/sotu/1974rn.html Viewed July 15, 2009.
3. President J. Carter, "The Crisis of Confidence" Speech, televised July 15, 1979. Available at: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/carter/ filmmore/ps-crisis.html Viewed July 15, 2009.
4. President B. Obama, March 19, 2009. Available at: http://www.whitehouse. gov/issues/energy-and-environment/, Viewed September 1, 2009.
5. CBS/New York Times Poll, 2007. April 20-24. CBS/New York Times poll, p.12.
6. Dunlap, R., 1995. Public opinion and environmental policy, in: Lester, J.P. (Ed.), Environmental politics and policy. Duke University Press, Durham.
7. Farhar, B.C., 1994. Trends in U.S. public perceptions and preferences on energy and environmental policy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 19, 211-239.
8. Douvere, F., Maes, F., Vanhulle, A., & Schrijvers, J. (2007). The role of marine spatial planning in sea use managemetn: The Belgian case. Marine policy, 31, 182-191.
9. Firestone, J., & Kempton, W. (2007). Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors. Energy policy, 35(3), 1584-1598.
10. Krueger, A. (2007). Valuing the preferences for offshore wind power: A choice experiment approach. University of Delaware, Delaware.
11. Pavlides, E. (2008). Rhode Island Wind Alliance. Paper presented at the Roger Williams 7th Marine Law Symposium. from http://law.rwu.edu/sites/ marineaffairs/content/pdf/RI-Wind-Alliance.pdf
12. Pavlides, E. (2005, March 7). The aesthetics of wind power: the visual logic of this phenomenon. Cape Cod Today.
13. PBS-online (2001). Eiffel Tower. Retrieved November 15, 2008: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/buildingbig/wonder/structure/eiffel-tower.html
14. Herve, L., & Bergdoll, B. (2003). The Eiffel Tower (1 ed.). Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.
15. Devine-Wright, P. (2005). Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy, 8(2), 125-139.
16. Hansen, L. K., Hammarlund, K., Sorensen, H. C., & Christensen, L. (2003). Public acceptance of wave energy. Paper presented at the the 5th European Wave Energy Conference, University College Cork, Ireland.
17. Pietrich, C. G.(1993). Science and the inherent subjective: the evolution of aesthetic assessment since NEPA. In S. H. a. J. Cannon (Ed.), Environmental Analysis: the NEPA experience. Oak Ridge: CRC Press.
18. Firestone, Kempton and Krueger, (in press), "Public Acceptance of Offshore Wind Power Projects in the United States" (manuscript) Wind Energy 12(2): 183-202. DOI: 10.1002/we.316
19. Steg, L., L. Dreijerink, and W. Abrahamse, Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2005. 25(4): p. 415-425.
20. Wüstenhagen, R., M. Wolsink, and M.J. Bürer, Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy policy, 2007. 35(5): p. 2683-2691.
21. Mayer, W.G. The changing American mind: How and why public opinion changed between 1960 and 1988. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. 1992.
22. Pierce, J.C. The dynamics of American public opinion: Patterns and processes, ed. K. Beatty and P.R. Hagner. 1982, Glenview, Ill..Scott, Foresman. xi, p.385.
23. Bolsen, T., & Cook, F. L. 2008. The Polls-trends: Public opinion on energy policy: 1974 - 2006. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 364-388.
24. Sorensen, H. C., et al., Public acceptability, in WaveNet: Results from the work of the European thematic network on wave energy, WaveNet, Editor. 2003: WaveNet: Results from the work of the European thematic network on wave energy. p. 305-317.
25. EIA - Energy Information Administration "History of energy in the United States: 1635-2000" Electricity. Annual Energy Review DOE/EIA-0384 (2007). Retrieved July 2, 2008, from http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/eh/elec. html
26. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis.
27. Advantages of Wave Power, Columbia Power Technologies. 2008 Available at: http://www.columbiapwr.com/advantages.asp Viewed March 10, 2009.
28. Wave energy offsets CO2 emissions. Wave Dragon. Available at: www.wavedragon.net Viewed March 13, 2008.
29. EPRI 2006. Generation technologies for a carbon-constrained world. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute.
30. Komor, P., Renewable Energy Policy. 2004. New York: iUniverse Inc.
31. Previsic, M., 2008. West Coast ocean energy resources, Alternative energy development in the West Coast ocean energy environment, Portland, OR.
32. Wiser, R., Barbose, G., 2008. Renewables Portfolio Standards in the United States: A status report with data through 2007. Lawrence Berkley National Laboratory.
33. EPRI, 2005. Ocean tidal and wave energy: Renewable energy technical assessment guide, in: McGowin, C., Bedard, R. (Eds.). Electric Power Research Institute Palo Alto, CA.
34. Hill, G.K., Off Oregon's coast, wave power makes a splash: Proposals from Garibaldi to Coos bay excite officials and worry the fishing industry, in The Oregonian. 2008: Portland.
35. Senate Bill 838, 2007. Senate Bill 838, Renewable Portfolio Standards, 74th Oregon Legislative Assebmly, in: Assebmly, t.O.L. (Ed.).
36. Oregon Territorial Sea Plan. Available at: http://www.oregon.gov/LCD/ OCMP/Ocean-Policies.shtml Viewed May 2007.
37. Dillman, D., Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. 2 ed. 2000, New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
38. The Civil Society Institute, http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org/media/ 022808release.cfmViewed March 10, 2009.
39. President Bush at the International Renewable Energy Conference 2008.
40. Barker, B. The color of money: For Portland to create a major green economy, we'll need an influx of bucks and brains. Portland monthly magazine, February, 2009. 27-28.
41. Mayer, J. City mantra: 'Green' will mean new jobs. the Oregonian. April 26, 2009.
42. Inglehart, R. 1990. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Inglehart, R. 2000. Globalization and postmodern values. The Washington Quarterly, 23(1), 215-228.
44. Mayer, W.G., The changing American mind: How and why public opinion changed between 1960 and 1988. 1992, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
45. Smith, E., Energy, the environment, and public opinion. 2002. Lanham, Md. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
46. Dunlap, R. and K. Van Liere, The "new environmental paradigm": A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 1978. 9: p. 10-19.
47. Dunlap, Van Liere, Mertig, & Jones, New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 2000. 56(3): p. 425-442.
48. Dunlap, R., The impact of political orientation on environmental attitudes and actions. Environment and Behavior, 1975. 7: p. 428-454.
49. Fransson, N. and T. Garling, Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1999. 19(4): p. 369-382.
50. Wüstenhagen, R., M. Wolsink, and M.J. Bürer, Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy policy, 2007. 35(5): p. 2683-2691.
51. Zoellner, J., P. Schweizer-Ries, and C. Wemheuer, Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany. Energy policy, 2008. 36(11): p. 4136-4141.
52. Pew Charitable Trust, Global Warming, 2009. Available at: http://www.pewtrusts.org/our-work-category.aspx?id=112 viewed March 10, 2009.