A co-located incompressible Navier-Stokes solver with exact mass, momentum and kinetic energy conservation in the inviscid limit

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 229, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 4703-4723

  Shashank, S ^a   Larsson, Johan ^a   Iaccarino, Gianluca ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Co located variable arrangement; Null space; Pressure stencil; Primary conservation; Secondary conservation

Indexed keywords

KINETIC ENERGY; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS;

CO-LOCATED; CO-LOCATED VARIABLE ARRANGEMENT; EXACT MASS; INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES; MASS-ENERGY CONSERVATION; NAVIER-STOKES SOLVER; NULL SPACE; PRESSURE STENCIL; PRIMARY CONSERVATION; SECONDARY CONSERVATION;

KINETICS;

EID: 77951540257     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Mittal R., Moin P. Suitability of upwind-biased finite difference schemes for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. AIAA Journal 1997, 35(8):1415-1417.
2. Morinishi Y., Lund T.S., Vasilyev O., Moin P. Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow. Journal of Computational Physics 1998, 143(1):90-124.
3. Morinishi Y., Vasilyev O., Ogi T. Fully conservative finite difference scheme in cylindrical coordinates for incompressible flow simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 2004, 197:686-710.
4. Ham F.E., Lien F.S., Strong A.B. A fully conservative second-order finite difference scheme for incompressible flow on nonuniform grids. Journal of Computational Physics 2002, 177(1):117-133.
5. Desjardins O., Blanquart G., Balarac G., Pitsch H. High order conservative finite difference scheme for variable density low mach number turbulent flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2008, 227:7125-7159.
6. Ferziger J., Peric M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics 1999, Springer-Verlag.
7. Rhie C., Chow W. Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA Journal 1983, 21:1525-1532.
8. Zang Y., Street R., Koseff J. A non-staggered grid, fractional step method for time-dependent incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in curvilinear coordinates. Journal of Computational Physics 1994, 114(1):18-33.
9. Peric M., Kessler R., Scheuerer G. Comparison of finite-volume numerical methods with staggered and colocated grids. Computers and Fluids 1988, 16:389-403.
10. Majumdar S. Role of underrelaxation in momentum interpolation for calculation of flow with nonstaggered grids. Numerical Heat Transfer 1988, 13:125-132.
11. Felten F., Lund T. Kinetic energy conservation issues associated with the collocated mesh scheme for incompressible flow. Journal of Computational Physics 2006, 215(2):465-484.
12. Ham F., Iaccarino G. Energy conservation in collocated discretization schemes on unstructured meshes. Center for Turbulence Research, Annual Research Briefs 2004, 3-14.
13. Golub G.H., Van Loan C.F. Matrix Computations 1996, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA. third ed.
14. Kim J., Moin P. Application of a fractional-step method to incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics 1985, 59:308-323.
15. Choi H., Moin P. Effects of the computational time step on numerical solutions of turbulent flow. Journal of Computational Physics 1994, 113(1):1-4.
16. Visbal M.R., Gaitonde D.V. On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes. Journal of Computational Physics 2002, 181(1):155-185.