Cellular uptake and toxicity of gold nanoparticles in prostate cancer cells: A comparative study of rods and spheres

Journal of Applied Toxicology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 212-217

  Arnida, ^a   Malugin, Alexander ^a   Ghandehari, Hamidreza ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Adsorptive endocytosis; Geometry; Gold nanoparticles; Protein binding; Toxicity; Uptake

Indexed keywords

GOLD NANOPARTICLE; MACROGOL;

ANTINEOPLASTIC ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; CANCER CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG UPTAKE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADSORPTION; BLOOD PROTEINS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL SURVIVAL; DRUG CARRIERS; ENDOCYTOSIS; GOLD; HUMANS; MALE; METAL NANOPARTICLES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 77951525639     PISSN: 0260437X     EISSN: 10991263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jat.1486     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alemdaroglu FE, Alemdaroglu NC, Langguth P, Herrmann A. 2008. Cellular uptake of DNA block copolymer micelles with different shapes. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 29: 326-329.
2. Brewer SH, Glomm WR, Johnson MC, Knag MK, Franzen S. 2005. Probing BSA binding to citrate coated gold nanoparticles and surfaces. Langmuir. 21: 9303-9307. (Pubitemid 41433978)
3. Champion JA, Mitragotri S. 2009. Shape induced inhibition of phagocytosis of polymer particles. Pharm. Res. 26: 244-249.
4. Chen J, Wiley B, Li ZY, Campbell D, Saeki F, Cang H, Au L, Lee J, Li X, Xia Y. 2005. Gold nanocages; engineering their structure for biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. 17: 2255-2261. (Pubitemid 41338537)
5. Chithrani BD, Ghazani AA, Chan WCW. 2006. Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett. 6: 662-668.
6. Choi Y, Baker LA, Hillebrenner H, Martin CR. 2006. Biosensing with conically shaped nanopores and nanotubes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8: 4976-4988.
7. Chorng-Shyan C, Cheng-Kang L, Kuan C, Kuan-Chaung L. 2005. Adsorption of BSA on the amphiphilic PEG graft copolymer-coated particles. Colloid Polym. Sci. 283: 917-924. (Pubitemid 40637332)
8. Daniel MC, Astruc D. 2004. Gold nanoparticles; assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size related properties and application toward biology, catalysis and nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 104: 293-346.
9. El-Sayed IH, Huang X, El-Sayed MA. 2005. Selective laser photo-thermal therapy of epithelial carcinoma using anti-EGFR antibody conjugated gold nanoparticles. Cancer Lett. 239: 129-135. (Pubitemid 43946581)
10. El-Sayed IH, Huang X, El-Sayed MA. 2006. Selective photothermal tumor ablation in mice using near infrared-absorbing nanoparticles. Cancer Lett. 209: 171-176.
11. Faraday M. 1857. The bakerian lecture; experimental relation of gold (and other metals) to light. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 147: 145-181.
12. Farquhar MG, Bergeron JJM, Palade GE. 1978. Recovery of surface membrane in anterior pituitary cells. Variations in traffic detected with anionic and cationic ferritin. J. Cell Biol. 77: R35-42.
13. Ferrari M. 2005. Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 5: 161-171.
14. Giri S, Trewyn BG, Stellmaker MP, Lin VSY. 2005. Stimuli-responsive controlled-release delivery system based on mesoporous silica nanorods capped with magnetic nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 44: 5038-5044. (Pubitemid 41188539)
15. Ghinea N, Simionescu N. 1983. Anionized and cationized hemeundecapeptides as probes for cell surface charge and permeability studies: differentiated labeling of endothelial plasmalemmal vesicles. J. Cell. Biol. 100: 606-612. (Pubitemid 15128637)
16. Gratton SEA, Ropp PA, Pohlhaus PD, Luft JC, Madden VJ, Napier ME, DeSimone JM. 2008. The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 105: 11613-11618.
17. Hamblin MR, Miller JL, Rizvi L, Loew HG, Hasan T. 2003. Pegylation of charged polymer-photosensitiser conjugates: effects on photodynamic efficacy Br. J. Cancer 89: 937-943. (Pubitemid 37175819)
18. Hirsch LR, Stafford RJ, Bankson JA, SR, Rivera B, Price RE, Hazle JD, Halas NJ, West JL. 2003. Nanoshell-mediated near-infrared thermal therapy of tumors under magnetic resonance guidance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 100: 13549-13554.
19. Hirsch LR, Halas NJ, West JL. 2005. Whole-blood immunoassay facilitated by gold- conjugate antibodies. Meth. Mol. Biol. 303: 101-111.
20. Huang X, Jain PK, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA. 2007. Gold nanoparticles: interesting optical properties and recent applications in cancer diagnostics and therapy. Nanomedicine 5: 681-693. (Pubitemid 350268247)
21. Huff TB, Tong L, Zhao Y, Hansen MN, Cheng JX, Wei A. 2007. Hyperthermic effects of gold nanorods on tumor cells. Nanomedicine 2: 125-132. (Pubitemid 46850567)
22. Jain PK, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA. 2007. Au nanoparticles target cancer. Nanotoday. 2: 18-29.
23. Mutsaers SE, Papadimitriou, JM. 1988. Surface charge of macrophages and their interaction with charged particles. J. Leukoc. Biol. 4: 17-26.
24. Nan A, Bai X, Son SJ, Lee SB, Ghandehari H. 2008. Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of silica nanotubes. Nano Lett. 8: 2150-2154.
25. Niidome T, Yamagata M, Okamoto Y, Akiyama Y, Takahashi H, Kawano T, Katayama Y, Niidome Y. 2006. PEG-modified gold nanorod with a stealth character for in vivo applications. J. Control. Release 114: 343-347. (Pubitemid 44310822)
26. O'Neal D, Hirsch L, Halas N, Payne J, West J. 2004. Photo-thermal tumor ablation in mice using near infrared-absorbing nanoparticles. Cancer Lett. 209: 171-176. (Pubitemid 38670486)
27. Paciotti GF, Myer L, Weinreich D, Goia D, Pavel N, McLaughlin RE, Tamarkin L. 2004. Colloidal gold; a novel nanoparticle vector for tumor directed drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 11: 169-183. (Pubitemid 38720414)
28. Ryan RO. 2008. Nanodisk: hydrophobic drug delivery vehicles. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 5: 343-351. (Pubitemid 351454383)
29. Salem AK, Searson PC, Leong KW. 2003. Multifunctional nanorods for gene delivery. Nat. Mater. 2: 668-671.
30. Shukla R, Bansal V, Chaudhary M, Basu A, Bhonde RR, Sastry M. 2005. Biocompatibility of gold nanoparticles and their endocytotic fate inside the cellular compartment: a microscopic overview. Langmuir. 21: 10644-10654. (Pubitemid 41692144)
31. Sokolov K, Follen M, Aaron J, Pavlova I, Malpica A, Lotan R, Richards-Kortum R. 2003. Real time vital optical imaging of precancer using anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies conjugated gold nanoparticles in cancer diagnostics: application in oral cancer. Nano Lett. 5: 829-834.
32. Stern JM, Stanfield J, Kabbani W, Hsieh J, Cadeddu JA. 2008. Selective prostate cancer thermal ablation with laser activated gold nanoshells. J. Urol. 179: 748-753.
33. Thomas M, Klibanov AM. 2003. Conjugation to gold nanoparticles enhances polyethylenimine's transfer of plasmid DNA into mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 100: 9138-9143. (Pubitemid 37033896)
34. Torchilin V. 2009. Multifunctional and stimuli-sensitive pharmaceutical nanocarriers. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 71: 431-444.
35. Wilhelm C, Billotey C, Roger J, Pons JN, Bacri JC, Gazeau F. 2003. Intracellular uptake of anionic supramagnetic nanoparticles as a function of their surface coating. Biomaterials 24: 1001-1011. (Pubitemid 36024170)
36. Xu Y, Linares KA, Meehan K, Love BJ, Love NG. 2004. pH dependent optical properties of surface modified gold nanoparticles using a bovine serum albumin coating. NSTI Nanotech Proc. 1: 15-18.