Fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of equine metacarpophalangeal articular cartilage

Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 107-115

  Olive, Julien ^a   D'Anjou, Marc André ^b   Girard, Christiane ^c   Laverty, Sheila ^b   Theoret, Christine ^a  

^a Département de Biomédecine Vétérinaire   (Canada)

^b Département de Sciences Cliniques   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cartilage; Horse; Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoarthritis

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; FOOT; HORSE; HORSE DISEASE; METACARPAL BONE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANIMALS; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FOOT JOINTS; HORSE DISEASES; HORSES; LINEAR MODELS; METACARPAL BONES; OSTEOARTHRITIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

CONGIOPODIDAE; EQUIDAE;

EID: 77951525584     PISSN: 10588183     EISSN: 17408261     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01633.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Pool RR. Pathologic manifestations of joint disease in the athletic horse. Joint Disease in the Horse 1996, 87-110. McIlwraith CWTrotter GW. In, (eds), Philadelphia, PA, W. B. Saunders
2. Cruz AM, Hurtig MB. Multiple pathways to osteoarthritis and articular fractures: is subchondral bone the culprit? Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2008, 24:101-116.
3. Easton KL, Kawcak CE. Evaluation of increased subchondral bone density in areas of contact in the metacarpophalangeal joint during joint loading in horses. Am J Vet Res 2007, 68:816-821.
4. Norrdin RW, Kawcak CE, Capwell BA, McIlwraith CW. Subchondral bone failure in an equine model of overload arthrosis. Bone 1998, 22:133-139.
5. Dyson SJ, Murray RC. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine fetlock. Clin Tech Eq Pract 2007, 6:62-77.
6. Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, Raynauld JP, Waterton JC, Peterfy C. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2006, 14((Suppl A)):46-75.
7. Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S. Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2004, 12:177-190.
8. Recht MP, Goodwin DW, Winalski CS, White LM. MRI of articular cartilage: revisiting current status and future directions. Am J Roentgenol 2005, 185:899-914.
9. Link TM, Stahl R, Woertler K. Cartilage imaging: motivation, techniques, current and future significance. Eur Radiol 2007, 17:1135-1146.
10. Raynauld JP. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2003, 15:647-650.
11. Taylor C, Carballido-Gamio J, Majumdar S, Li X. Comparison of quantitative imaging of cartilage for osteoarthritis: T2, T1rho, dGEMRIC and contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Magn Reson Imaging 2009, 27:779-84.
12. Zubrod CJ, Schneider RK, Tucker RL, Gavin PR, Ragle CA, Farnsworth KD. Use of magnetic resonance imaging for identifying subchondral bone damage in horses: 11 cases (1999-2003). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004, 224:411-418.
13. Branch MV, Murray RC, Dyson SJ, Goodship AE. Alteration of distal tarsal subchondral bone thickness pattern in horses with tarsal pain. Equine Vet J 2007, 39:101-105.
14. Martinelli MJ, Baker GJ, Clarkson RB, Eurell JC, Pijanowski GJ, Kuriashkin IV. Magnetic resonance imaging of degenerative joint disease in a horse: a comparison to other diagnostic techniques. Equine Vet J 1996, 28:410-415.
15. Anastasiou A, Skioldebrand E, Ekman S, Hall LD. Ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging of the distal row of equine carpal bones: assessment of bone sclerosis and cartilage damage. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2003, 44:501-512.
16. Kawcak CE, Frisbie DD, Werpy NM, Park RD, McIlwraith CW. Effects of exercise vs. experimental osteoarthritis on imaging outcomes. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2008, 16:1519-1525.
17. Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Genovese M, Dillingham MF, Lang P. Articular cartilage of knee: normal patterns at MR imaging that mimic disease in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis. Radiology 2004, 231:31-38.
18. Eckstein F, Burstein D, Link TM. Quantitative MRI of cartilage and bone: degenerative changes in osteoarthritis. NMR Biomed 2006, 19:822-854.
19. Murray RC, Branch MV, Tranquille C, Woods S. Validation of magnetic resonance imaging for measurement of equine articular cartilage and subchondral bone thickness. Am J Vet Res 2005, 66:1999-2005.
20. Olive J, d'Anjou MA, Alexander K, Laverty S, Theoret C. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of non-cartilaginous changes in equine metacarpophalangeal osteoarthritis: a comparison with computed tomography and radiography. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009, in press
21. Koo S, Gold GE, Andriacchi TP. Considerations in measuring cartilage thickness using MRI: factors influencing reproducibility and accuracy. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2005, 13:782-789.
22. Spriet MP, Girard CA, Foster SF, Harasiewicz K, Holdsworth DW, Laverty S. Validation of a 40 MHz B-scan ultrasound biomicroscope for the evaluation of osteoarthritis lesions in an animal model. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2005, 13:171-179.
23. Mankin HJ, Dorfman H, Lippiello L, Zarins A. Biochemical and metabolic abnormalities in articular cartilage from osteo-arthritic human hips. II. Correlation of morphology with biochemical and metabolic data. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1971, 53:523-537.
24. Boileau C, Martel-Pelletier J, Abram F. Magnetic resonance imaging can accurately assess the long-term progression of knee structural changes in experimental dog osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2008, 67:926-932.
25. Blumenkrantz G, Majumdar S. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Eur Cell Mater 2007, 13:76-86.
26. Marshall KW, Guthrie BT, Mikulis DJ. Quantitative cartilage imaging. Br J Rheumatol 1995, 34:29-31.
27. Dupuy DE, Spillane RM, Rosol MS. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with three-dimensional MR imaging. Acad Radiol 1996, 3:919-924.
28. Jaremko JL, Maciejewski CM, Cheng RW. Accuracy and reliability of MRI vs. laboratory measurements in an ex vivo porcine model of arthritic cartilage loss. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 26:992-1000.
29. Hunter DJ, Lo GH, Gale D, Grainger AJ, Guermazi A, Conaghan PG. The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Ann Rheum Dis 2008, 67:206-211.
30. Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Hargreaves BA. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004, 20:857-864.
31. Raynauld JP, Martel-Pelletier J, Abram F. Analysis of the precision and sensitivity to change of different approaches to assess cartilage loss by quantitative MRI in a longitudinal multicentre clinical trial in knee osteoarthritis patients. Arthritis Res Ther 2008, 10:129.
32. McGibbon CA, Trahan CA. Measurement accuracy of focal cartilage defects from MRI and correlation of MRI graded lesions with histology: a preliminary study. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2003, 11:483-493.
33. Mosher TJ, Pruett SW. Magnetic resonance imaging of superficial cartilage lesions: role of contrast in lesion detection. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999, 10:178-182.
34. Kornaat PR, Bloem JL, Ceulemans RY. Osteoarthritis of the knee: association between clinical features and MR imaging findings. Radiology 2006, 239:811-817.
35. Wenham CY, Conaghan PG. Imaging the painful osteoarthritic knee joint: what have we learned? Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2009, 5:149-158.
36. Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. Am J Roentgenol 1999, 172:1073-1080.
37. Barr ED, Pinchbeck GL, Clegg PD, Boyde A, Riggs CM. Post mortem evaluation of palmar osteochondral disease (traumatic osteochondrosis) of the métacarpo/metatarsophalangeal joint in Thoroughbred racehorses. Equine Vet J 2009, 41:366-371.
38. Masi JN, Sell CA, Phan C. Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model. Radiology 2005, 236:140-150.
39. Recht MP, Piraino DW, Paletta GA, Schils JP, Belhobek GH. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Radiology 1996, 198:209-212.
40. Frisbie DD, Cross MW, McIlwraith CW. A comparative study of articular cartilage thickness in the stifle of animal species used in human pre-clinical studies compared to articular cartilage thickness in the human knee. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006, 19:142-146.
41. Bouchgua M, Alexander K, Andre d'Anjou M. Use of routine clinical multimodality imaging in a rabbit model of osteoarthritis-part I. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2009, 17:188-196.
42. Murray R, Dyson SJ. Validation of magnetic resonance imaging use in equine limbs. Clin Tech Eq Pract 2007, 6:26-36.
43. Nakanishi K, Tanaka H, Nishii T, Masuhara K, Narumi Y, Nakamura H. MR evaluation of the articular cartilage of the femoral head during traction. Correlation with resected femoral head. Acta Radiol 1999, 40:60-63.
44. Kramer J, Recht MP, Imhof H, Stiglbauer R, Engel A. Postcontrast MR arthrography in assessment of cartilage lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994, 18:218-224.
45. Wang SF, Cheng HC, Chang CY. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo imaging: a modified FS 3D SPGR technique for assessment of patellofemoral joint chondromalacia. Clin Imaging 1999, 23:177-180.
46. Bydder M, Rahal A, Fullerton GD, Bydder GM. The magic angle effect: a source of artifact, determinant of image contrast, and technique for imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 25:290-300.
47. Wacker FK, Bolze X, Felsenberg D, Wolf KJ. Orientation-dependent changes in MR signal intensity of articular cartilage: a manifestation of the " magic angle" effect. Skeletal Radiol 1998, 27:306-310.
48. Kneeland JB. Articular cartilage and the magic angle effect. Am J Roentgenol 2001, 177:671-672.
49. Mosher TJ, Smith H, Dardzinski BJ, Schmithorst VJ, Smith MB. MR imaging and T2 mapping of femoral cartilage: in vivo determination of the magic angle effect. Am J Roentgenol 2001, 177:665-669.
50. Xia Y. Magic-angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage: a review. Invest Radiol 2000, 35:602-621.
51. Sittek H, Eckstein F, Gavazzeni A. Assessment of normal patellar cartilage volume and thickness using MRI: an analysis of currently available pulse sequences. Skeletal Radiol 1996, 25:55-62.
52. Peterfy CG, Gold G, Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, Dardzinski B, Stevens R. MRI protocols for whole-organ assessment of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartilage 2006, 14((Suppl A)):95-111.
53. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. Am J Roentgenol 1996, 167:127-132.
54. McGibbon CA, Bencardino J, Palmer WE. Subchondral bone and cartilage thickness from MRI: effects of chemical-shift artifact. MAGMA 2003, 16:1-9.
55. Disler DG, Peters TL, Muscoreil SJ. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1994, 163:887-892.
56. Hashemi RH, Bradley WG, Lisanti CJ. MRI: The Basics 2003, Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins