Genetic diversity and fitness in small populations of partially asexual, self-incompatible plants

Heredity

Volumn 104, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 482-492

  Navascues M ^a,b   Stoeckel, S ^c   Mariette, S ^d  

^a INIA   (Spain)

^b ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^c AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

^d CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Asexual reproduction; Inbreeding depression; Linkage disequilibrium; Mutation load; Number of S alleles; Self incompatibility

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; FITNESS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENOME; HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING; MUTATION; PLANT BREEDING; POPULATION GENETICS; SELF INCOMPATIBILITY;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETICS; PLANT; POPULATION; POPULATION GENETICS;

ALLELES; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC LOCI; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; PLANTS; POPULATION; REPRODUCTION, ASEXUAL;

EID: 77951498577     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.159     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Balloux F, Lehmann L, de Meeus T (2003). The population genetics of clonal and partially clonal diploids. Genetics 164: 1635-1644. (Pubitemid 37102223)
2. Barrett SCH (2002). The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat Rev Genet 3: 274-284.
3. Bataillon T, Kirkpatrick M (2000). Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populations: size does matter. Genet Res 75: 75-81.
4. Bengtsson BO, Ceplitis A (2000). The balance between sexual and asexual reproduction in plants living in variable environments. J Evolution Biol 13: 415-422.
5. Birky CW (1996). Heterozygosity, heteromorphy, and phylogenetic trees in asexual eukaryotes. Genetics 144: 427-437.
6. Brennan AC, Harris SA, Hiscock SJ (2003). The population genetics of sporophytic self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L (Asteraceae): avoidance of mating constraints imposed by low S-allele number. Philos Trans R Soc B 358: 1047-1050.
7. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987). Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18: 237-268.
8. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1979). The evolution and breakdown of S-allele systems. Heredity 43: 41-55.
9. Chasnov JR (2000). Mutation-selection balance, dominance and the maintenance of sex. Genetics 156: 1419-1425.
10. Chen L, Stace HM, James SH (1997). Self-incompatibility, seed abortion and clonality in the breeding systems of several Western Australian Drosera species (Droseraceae). Aust J Bot 45: 191-201.
11. Eckert CG (2001). The loss of sex in clonal plants. Evol Ecol 15: 501-520.
12. Fisher RA (1941). Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann Eugen 11: 53-63.
13. Garnier-Géré P, Dillmann C (1992). A computer program for testing pairwise linkage disequilibria in subdivided populations. J Hered 83: 239.
14. Glémin S (2003). How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating. Evolution 57: 2678-2687.
15. Glémin S, Bataillon T, Ronfort J, Mignot A, Olivieri I (2001). Inbreeding depression in small populations of self-incompatible plants. Genetics 159: 1217-1229.
16. Haag CR, Roze D (2007). Genetic load in sexual and asexual diploids: segregation, dominance and genetic drift. Genetics 176: 1663-1678.
17. Igic B, Lande R, Kohn JR (2008). Loss of self-incompatibility and its evolutionary consequences. Int J Plant Sci 169: 93-104.
18. Jones RC, McKinnon GE, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE (2005). Genetic diversity and mating system of an endangered tree Eucalyptus morrisbyi. Aust J Bot 53: 367-377.
19. Karron JD (1987). A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism and self-compatibility in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. Evol Ecol 1: 47-58.
20. Kimura M, Crow JF (1964). The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49: 725-738.
21. Kirkpatrick M, Jenkins CD (1989). Genetic segregation and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Nature 339: 300-301.
22. Kunin WE, Shmida A (1997). Plant reproductive traits as a function of local, regional, and global abundance. Conserv Biol 11: 183-192.
23. de Meeus T, Balloux F (2004). Clonal reproduction and linkage disequilibrium in diploids: a simulation study. Infect Genet Evol 4: 345-351.
24. de Meeus T, Prugnolle F, Agnew P (2007). Asexual reproduction: genetics and evolutionary aspects. Cell Mol Life Sci 64: 1355-1372.
25. Mena-Alí J, Keser L, Stephenson A (2008). Inbreeding depression in Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae), a species with a plastic self-incompatibility response. BMC Evol Biol 8: 10.
26. Mena-Alí J, Keser L, Stephenson A (2009). The effect of sheltered load on reproduction in Solanum carolinense, a species with variable self-incompatibility. Sex Plant Reprod 22: 63-71.
27. Muirhead CA, Lande R (1997). Inbreeding depression under joint selfing, outcrossing, and asexuality. Evolution 51: 1409-1415.
28. de Nettancourt D (1977). Incompatibility in Angiosperms. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: New York.
29. Pamilo P (1987). Heterozygosity in apomictic organisms. Hereditas 107: 95-101.
30. Reinartz JA, Les DH (1994). Bottleneck-induced dissolution of self-incompatibility and breeding system consequences in Aster furcatus (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 81: 446-455.
31. Stoeckel S, Grange J, Fernandez-Manjarres JF, Bilger I, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Mariette S (2006). Heterozygote excess in a selfincompatible and partially clonal forest tree species-Prunus avium L. Mol Ecol 15: 2109-2118.
32. Stone JL (2004). Sheltered load associated with S-alleles in Solanum carolinense. Heredity 92: 335-342.
33. Takahata N (1990). A simple genealogical structure of strongly balanced allelic lines and trans-species evolution of polymorphism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 2419-2423.
34. Uyenoyama MK (2003). Genealogy-dependent variation in viability among self-incompatibility genotypes. Theor Popul Biol 63: 281-293.
35. Vallejo-Marín M (2007). The paradox of clonality and the evolution of self-incompatibility. Plant Signal Behav 2: 265-266.
36. Vallejo-Marín M, Brien HE (2007). Correlated evolution of self-incompatibility and clonal reproduction in Solanum (Solanaceae). New Phytol 173: 415-421.
37. Vallejo-Marín M, Uyenoyama MK (2008). On the evolutionary modification of self-incompatibility: implications of partial clonality for allelic diversity and genealogical structure. In: Franklin-Tong VE (ed). Self-Incompatibility in Flowering Plants. Evolution, Diversity, andMechanisms. Springer: Berlin, pp 53-71.
38. Yokoyama S, Hetherington LE (1982). The expected number of self-incompatibility alleles in finite plant populations. Heredity 48: 299-303.
39. Young AG, Hill JH, Murray BG, Peakall R (2002). Breeding system, genetic diversity and clonal structure in the subalpine forb Rutidosis leiolepis F Muell. (Asteraceae). Biol Conserv 106: 71-78.