Innovative faculty evaluation criteria for incentivizing high-impact interdisciplinary collaboration

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Rikakis, Thanassis ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Faculty evaluation; Interdisciplinary collaboration; Promotion and tenure

Indexed keywords

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY; ENGINEERING FACULTY; EVALUATION CRITERIA; EVALUATION STANDARD; FACULTY MEMBERS; HIGH IMPACT; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATIONS; KEY COMPONENT; META-MATRIX; RESEARCH OUTCOME;

STANDARDS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 77951491286     PISSN: 15394565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2009.5350751     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. National Academy of Engineering, Grand Challenges for Engineering, National. Academies Press, Washington, DC: National. Academies, 2008.
2. Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research and Committee on. Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: National Academies, 2004.
3. National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academies, 2004.
4. Jamison, L., Engineering Education in a Changing World. 2008, Chicago, IL: International Engineering Consortium,
5. Page, S.E., The Difference. 2007, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
6. Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F., & Uzzi, B, (2007b). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316,1036-1039.
7. Guimera, R., et al., Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance. Science, 2005. 308(29): p. 697-702.
8. Accreditation. Board for Engineering and Technology Engineering Accreditation Commission, Engineering Criteria 2000. 3 Edition. Publication 98AB-7a The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. Baltimore, MD. 1999-2000.
9. Riley, Sheilah, Engineering Schools Strive to serve Pinter with Planck. 01.28.2008, Electrical Engineering Times
10. Felder, R., et al., The Future of Engineering Education; Teaching Methods that Work. Chem. Engr. Education, 34(1), 26-39 (2000).
11. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine, Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005
12. Manufacturmg.net staff, Survey: Kids Saying No To Engineering, 01.08.2009, Manufacturi.ng.net
13. National Science Foundation, Impact of Transformative Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Education on Academic Institutions, Washington, DC: NSF, 2009.
14. www.cra.org/reports/promotion-tenure.html
15. Mitchell, W.J., A.S. Inouye, and M.S. Blumenthal, Beyond Productivity: Information Technology, Innovation, and Creativity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003.
16. National Council for Science and the Environment, Council of Environmental Deans and Directors, Guidance for Interdisciplinary Hiring and Career Development, 2005
17. Pfirman, S., J. Collins, S. Lowes and A. Michaels, 2005, To Thrive and Prosper: Hiring, Fostering and Tenuring Interdisciplinary Scholars. Project Kaleidoscope Resource