A new and flexible method for constructing designs for computer experiments

Annals of Statistics

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1460-1477

  Lin, C Devon ^a   Bingham, Derek ^b   Sitter, Randy R ^b   Tang, Boxin ^b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cascading Latin hypercube; Hadamard matrix; Kronecker product; Orthogonal array; Orthogonal Latin hypercube; Space filling design

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951470234     PISSN: 00905364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1214/09-AOS757     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BINGHAM, D., SITTER, R. R. and TANG, B. (2009). Orthogonal and nearly orthogonal designs for computer experiments. Biometrika 96 51-65. MR2482134
2. CIOPPA, T. M. and LUCAS, T. W. (2007). Efficient nearly orthogonal and space-filling Latin hypercubes. Technometrics 49 45-55. MR2345451
3. COLBOURN, C. J., KLøVE, T. and LING, A. C. H. (2004). Permutation arrays for powerline communication and mutually orthogonal Latin squares. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 50 1289-1291. MR2094885
4. DEY, A. andMUKERJEE, R. (1999). Fractional Factorial Plans. Wiley, New York. MR1679441
5. GERAMITA, A. V. and SEBERRY, J. (1979). Orthogonal Designs: Quadratic Forms and Hadamard Matrices. Dekker, New York. MR0534614
6. HANDCOCK, M. S. (1991). On cascading Latin hypercube designs and additive models for experiments. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 20 417-439. MR1130942
7. HEDAYAT, A. S., SLOANE, N. J. A. and STUFKEN, J. (1999). Orthogonal Arrays: Theory and Applications. Springer, New York. MR1693498
8. JONES, D. R., SCHONLAU, M. andWELCH, W. J. (1998). Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J. Global Optim. 13 455-492. MR1673460
9. JOSEPH, V. R. and HUNG, Y. (2008). Orthogonal-maximin Latin hypercube designs. Statist. Sinica 18 171-186. MR2416907
10. KENNEDY, M. C. and O'HAGAN, A. (2001). Bayesian calibration of computer models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 63 425-464. MR1858398
11. LIN, C. D. (2008). New developments in designs for computer experiments and physical experiments. Ph.D. thesis, Simon Fraser Univ.
12. LINKLETTER, C., BINGHAM, D., HENGARTNER, N., HIGDON, D. and YE, K. Q. (2006). Variable selection for Gaussian process models in computer experiments. Technometrics 48 478-490. MR2328617
13. MCKAY, M. D., BECKMAN, R. J. and CONOVER, W. J. (1979). A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21 239-245. MR0533252
14. MORRIS, M. D. andMITCHELL, T. J. (1995). Exploratory designs for computational experiments. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 43 381-402.
15. MUKERJEE, R. and WU, C. F. J. (2006). A Modern Theory of Factorial Designs. Springer, New York. MR2230487
16. SACKS, J., WELCH, W. J., MITCHELL, T. J. and WYNN, H. P. (1989). Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist. Sci. 4 409-435. MR1041765
17. SHEWRY, M. C. andWYNN, H. P. (1987). Maximum entropy sampling. J. Appl. Statist. 4 409-435.
18. STEINBERG, D.M. andLIN, D. K. J. (2006). A constructionmethod for orthogonal Latin hypercube designs. Biometrika 93 279-288. MR2278083
19. VARTAK, M. N. (1955). On an application of Kronecker product of matrices to statistical designs. Ann. Math. Statist. 26 420-438. MR0072095
20. WELCH, W. J., BUCK, R. J., SACKS, J., WYNN, H. P., MITCHELL, T. J. and MORRIS, M. D. (1992). Screening, predicting, and computer experiments. Technometrics 34 15-25.
21. XU, H. (2002). An algorithm for constructing orthogonal and nearly-orthogonal arrays with mixed levels and small runs. Technometrics 44 356-368. MR1939683
22. YE, K. Q. (1998). Orthogonal column Latin hypercubes and their application in computer experiments. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 93 1430-1439. MR1666638