Indifferents as an interface between Contra and Pro

Acta Physica Polonica A

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 695-699

  Malarz, K ^a   KuLakowski K ^a  

^a AGH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

MEAN FIELD APPROACH; MODEL FORMULATION; NETWORK TOPOLOGY; PUBLIC OPINIONS; SZNAJD MODEL; VOTER MODELS;

TOPOLOGY;

EID: 77951461478     PISSN: 05874246     EISSN: 1898794X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12693/APhysPolA.117.695     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. J. Szacki, History of Sociological Thought, Greenwood Press, Westport, Conn. 1979.
2. C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, V. Loreto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591 (2009).
3. Numerous examples can be found in reports of the Public Opinion Research Center (http://www.cbos.pl/). However, there are also less convincing examples when the answer Don't know is mixed with Refused, as in J. Ray, Gallup Poll, May 12 (2009).
4. J. Hegselmann, U. Krauze, J. Artificial Societies Social Simulation, 5, no.3, paper 2 (2002), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/3/2.html.
5. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch, Adv. Complex Sys. 3, 87 (2000).
6. K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Sznajd, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 11, 1157 (2000).
7. D. Stauffer, A.O. Sousa, S.M. de Oliveira, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 12, 1239 (2000).
8. R. Ochrombel, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 12, 1091 (2001).
9. A.T. Bernardes, D. Stauffer, J. Kertesz, Eur. Phys. J. B 25, 123 (2002).
10. D. Stauffer, Comp. Phys. Commun. 146, 93 (2002).
11. D. Stauffer, P.M.C. de Oliveira, Eur. Phys. J. B 30, 587 (2002).
12. C. Schulze, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 14, 95 (2003).
13. C. Schulze, Physica A 324, 717 (2003).
14. J. Bonnekoh, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 14, 1231 (2003).
15. J.J. Schneider, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 659 (2004).
16. K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Sznajd, Physica A 351, 593 (2005).
17. S. Fortunato, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 16, 17 (2005).
18. G. Szabó, A. Szolnoki, Phys. Rev. E 65, 036115 (2002).
19. T. Hadzibeganovic, D. Stauffer, C. Schulze, Physica A 387, 3242 (2008).
20. M. Peltomäki, M. Rost, M. Alava, J. Stat. Mech. P02042 (2009).
21. Y.-H. Yang, Y. Chen, S.-M. Qin, Blume-Emery-Griffiths dynamics in social networks, arXiv:0810.2829.
22. M. He, Q. Sun, H. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 15, 767 (2004)
23. L. Dali'Asta, T. Galla, J. Phys. A 41, 435003 (2008).
24. E. Noelle-Neumann, The Spiral of Silence. A Theory of Public Opinion - Our Social Skin, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1984.
25. P. Pacewicz, Polls are burning (in Polish), Gazeta Wyborcza 2007-09-107
26. P. Glendinning, Stability, Instability and Chaos: an Introduction to the Theory of Nonlinear Differential Equations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1994.
27. T.M. Liggett, Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes, Springer, Berlin 1999.
28. V. Sood, Tibor Antal, S. Redner, Phys. Rev. E 77, 041121 (2008).
29. PL. Krapivsky, Phys. Rev. A 45, 1067 (1992).
30. S. Wasserman, K. Faust, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1994.
31. M. Williams, T. May, Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Research, UCL Press, London 1996.