The analyst in action: An individual account of what Jungians do and why they do it

International Journal of Psychoanalysis

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 287-303

  Colman, Warren ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Boundaries; Jungian analysis; Similarities and difference; Symbols; The self

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COUNTER TRANSFERENCE; EGO; EGO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MENTAL DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; SYMBOLISM; UNITED KINGDOM;

COUNTERTRANSFERENCE (PSYCHOLOGY); EGO; FEMALE; FREUDIAN THEORY; HUMANS; JUNGIAN THEORY; LONDON; MENTAL DISORDERS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY; SYMBOLISM; UNCONSCIOUS (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 77951459654     PISSN: 00207578     EISSN: 17458315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00226.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Astor J (1995). Michael Fordham: Innovations in analytical psychology. London: Routledge.
2. Astor J (1998). Some Jungian and Freudian perspectives on the Oedipus myth and beyond. Int J Psychoanal 79:697-712.
3. Astor J (2003). Response to Dr Britton. SAP Analytic Group, 3 March.
4. Balint M (1968). The basic fault: Therapeutic aspects of regression. London: Routledge.
5. Bright G (1997). Synchronicity as a basis of analytic attitude. J Anal Psychol 42:613-635
6. Britton R (1989). The missing link: Parental sexuality in the Oedipus complex. In: Steiner J, Britton R, Feldman M, O'Shaughnessy E, editor. The Oedipus complex today: Clinical implications, 83-102. London: Karnac.
7. Davidson D (1966). Transference as a form of active imagination. In: Technique in Jungian analysis, 152-77. London: Heinemann, 1974. (Library of Analytical Psychology, vol. 2.)
8. Fordham M (1957). Notes on the transference. In: Technique in Jungian analysis, 111-151 London: Heinemann, 1974. (Library of Analytical Psychology, vol. 2.)
9. Fordham M (1960). Countertransference. In: Technique in Jungian analysis, 240-500. London: Heinemann, 1974. (Library of Analytical Psychology, vol. 2.)
10. Fordham M (1985). Integration-deintegration in infancy. In: Explorations into the self, 50-63. London: Academic Press.
11. Fordham M (1987). Actions of the self. In: Young-Eisendrath P, Hall J, editors. The book of the self. New York, NY: New York UP.
12. Gordon R (1967). Symbols: content and process. In: Analytical psychology: A modern science. Library of Analytical Psychology Vol. 1. London: Academic Press, 1980.
13. Hamilton V (1996). The analyst's pre-conscious. Analytic Press.
14. Jones E (1916). The theory of symbolism. In: Papers on psychoanalysis, 87-144. London: Bailliere, Tindall & Cox, 1938.
15. Jung CG (1916). The transcendent function. Collected works, vol.8, 67-91. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
16. Jung CG (1921). Psychological types. Collected works, vol.6. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
17. Jung CG (1929). Problems of modern psychotherapy. Collected works, vol.16, 53-75. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
18. Jung CG (1944). Psychology and alchemy. Collected works, vol.12. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
19. Jung CG (1946). The psychology of the transference. In: Collected works, vol.16, 163-326. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20. Jung CG (1952). Symbols of transformation. Collected works, vol.5. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
21. Kalsched D (2003). Daimonic elements in early trauma. J Anal Psychol 48:145-169
22. Knox J (2009). When words don't mean what they say: Self-agency and the coercive use of language. J Anal Psychol 54:25-41.
23. Milner M (1955). The role of illusion in symbol formation. In: Klein M, Heimann P, Money-Kyrle R, editors. New directions in psycho-analysis, 82-108. London: Tavistock.
24. Otto R (1917). The idea of the holy, Harvey J, translator. New York, NY: Oxford UP, 1958.
25. Stein L (1957). What is a symbol supposed to be? In: Analytical psychology: A modern science, 39- 56. London: Academic Press, 1980. (Library of Analytical Psychology, vol. 1.)
26. Tuckett D (2008). Psychoanalysis comparable and incomparable: The evolution of a method to describe and compare psychoanalytic approaches. Hove, New York, NY: Routledge.
27. Wiener J (2002). What do psychoanalysts in the United Kingdom think of analytical psychology? Am Imago 59:197-207.
28. Wilkinson M (2003). Undoing trauma: Contemporary neuroscience: A Jungian clinical perspective. J Anal Psychol 48:235-253
29. Winnicott DW (1953 / 1971). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. In: Playing and reality, p. 1-25. London: Tavistock Publications.