Patient-centeredness and technology-enhanced care: Mutually exclusive or synergistic?

Clinical Nurse Specialist

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 121-122

  Barton, Amy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; NURSE; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING INFORMATICS; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; UNITED STATES;

HUMANS; INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE (U.S.); NURSE CLINICIANS; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING INFORMATICS; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77951434958     PISSN: 08876274     EISSN: 15389782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NUR.0b013e3181d828e0     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century.Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
2. Sandelowski M. Devices and Desires: Gender, Technology, and American Nursing. Chapel Hill, NC: UNC Press; 2000.
3. Berwick DM. What Fpatient-centered-should mean: confessions of an extremist. Health Aff. 2009;28(4):w555-w565. DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w555.
4. Cronenwett L, Sherwood G, Pohl J, et al. Quality and safety education for advanced nursing practice. Nurs Outlook. 2009; 57(6):338h-348h.
5. Quality and safety in education for nurses. www.qsen.org. Accessed January 15, 2010.