Discrete deformable model guided by partial active shape model for trus image segmentation

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1158-1166

  Yan, Pingkun ^a   Xu, Sheng ^a   Turkbey, Baris ^b   Kruecker, Jochen ^a  

^a PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrete deformable model (DDM); Dynamic programming; Image segmentation; Partial active shape model (PASM); Prostate; Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE SHAPE MODELS; APRIORI; CLINICAL APPLICATION; COARSE TO FINE; DISCRETE DEFORMABLE MODEL; DISCRETE DEFORMABLE MODEL (DDM); ENERGY FUNCTIONALS; LOW SNR; MEAN ABSOLUTE DISTANCE; MULTI-RESOLUTIONS; NOVEL METHODS; OPTIMAL SEARCH; PARTIAL CONTOURS; PROSTATE SEGMENTATION; PROSTATE TISSUE; SEGMENTATION PROCESS; SEGMENTATION RESULTS; SHAPE CORRECTION; SHAPE ESTIMATION; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND IMAGES; TRUS IMAGES; USER INTERACTION;

BIOMINERALIZATION; COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; DEFORMATION; DIGITAL IMAGE STORAGE; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; ULTRASONICS;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; MODEL; PROSTATE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 77951285135     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2037491     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Cancer Society. (2008). "Prostate cancer," American Cancer Society Atlanta, GA [Online]. Available: http://www.cancer.org/
2. G. Fichtinger, A. Krieger, R. C. Susil, A. Tańacs, L. L. Whitcomb, and E. Atalar, "Transrectal prostate biopsy inside closed MRI scanner with remote actuation, under real-time image guidance," in Proc. MICCAI (1), 2002, pp. 91-98.
3. K. K. Hodge, J. E. McNeal, M. K. Terris, and T. A. Stamey, "Random-systematic versus directed ultrasound-guided core-biopsies of the prostate," J. Urol., vol.142, pp. 71-75, 1989.
4. D. Shen, Z. Lao, J. Zeng,W. Zhang, I. A. Sesterhenn, L. Sun, J.W. Moul, E. H. Herskovits, G. Fichtinger, and C. Davatzikos, "Optimized prostate biopsy via a statistical atlas of cancer spatial distribution," Med. Image Anal., vol.8, pp. 139-150, 2003. (Pubitemid 38444062)
5. J. Kruecker, S. Xu, N. Glossop, P. Guion, P. Choyke, A. Singh, and B. J. Wood, "Fusion of real-time transrectal ultrasound with pre-acquired MRI for multimodality prostate imaging," in Proc. Med. Imag. 2007: Vis., Image-Guid. Procedures Display (SPIEMedical Imaging), vol.6509, pp. 1201-1212.
6. S. Xu, J. Kruecker, P. Guion, N. Glossop, Z. Neeman, P. Choyke, A. K. Singh, and B. J. Wood, "Closed-loop control in fused MR-TRUS image-guided prostate biopsy," in Proc. MICCAI (Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci.), 2007, vol.4791, pp. 128-135.
7. P. Yan, S. Xu, B. Turkbey, and J. Kruecker, "Optimal search guided by partial active shape model for prostate segmentation in TRUS images," in Proc. Med. Imag. 2009: Vis., Image-Guid. Procedures Model., Bellingham, WA, vol.7261, pp. 1G01-1G11.
8. F. Shao, K. V. Ling, W. S. Ng, and R. Wu, "Prostate boundary detection from ultrasonographic images," J. Ultrasound Med., vol.22, pp. 605-623, 2003. (Pubitemid 36637625)
9. J. A. Nobel and D. Boukerroui, "Ultrasound image segmentation: A survey," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol.25, no.8, pp. 987-1010, Aug. 2006. (Pubitemid 44192172)
10. S. Badiei, S. E. Salcudean, J. Varah, and W. J. Morris, "Prostate segmentation in 2D ultrasound images using image warping and ellipse fitting," in Proc. MICCAI, 2006, vol.4191, pp. 17-24. (Pubitemid 44609199)
11. H. M. Ladak, F. Mao, Y. Wang, D. B. Downey, D. A. Steinman, and A. Fenster, "Prostate boundary segmentation from 2Dultrasound images," Med. Phys., vol.27, no.8, pp. 1777-1788, 2000. (Pubitemid 30666353)
12. Y. Wang, H. N. Cardinal, D. B. Downey, and A. Fenster, "Semiautomatic three-dimensional segmentation of the prostate using two-dimensional ultrasound images," Med. Phys., vol.30, pp. 887-897, May 2003. (Pubitemid 36578692)
13. D. Shen, Y. Zhan, and C. Davatzikos, "Segmentation of prostate boundaries from ultrasound images using statistical shape model," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol.22, no.4, pp. 539-551, Apr. 2003. (Pubitemid 37477158)
14. Y. Zhan and D. Shen, "Deformable segmentation of 3-D ultrasound prostate images using statistical texture matching method," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol.25, no.3, pp. 256-272, Mar. 2006. (Pubitemid 43320643)
15. L. Gong, S. D. Pathak, D. R. Haynor, P. S. Cho, and Y. Kim, "Parametric shape modeling using deformable super ellipses for prostate segmentation," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol.23, no.3, pp. 340-349, Mar. 2004.
16. P. Abolmaesumi and M. R. Sirouspour, "An interacting multiple model probabilistic data association filter for cavity boundary extraction from ultrasound images," IEEE Trans.Med. Imag., vol.23, no.6, pp. 772-784, Jun. 2004.
17. A. C. Hodge, A. Fenster, D. B. Downey, and H. M. Ladak, "Prostate boundary segmentation from ultrasound images using 2D active shape models: Optimisation and extension to 3D," Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed., vol.84, pp. 99-113, 2006. (Pubitemid 46053596)
18. P. Yan,W. Shen, A. A. Kassim, and M. Shah, "Segmentation of neighboring organs in medical image with model competition," in Proc. MICCAI (Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci.), 2005, vol.3749, pp. 270-277. (Pubitemid 43828260)
19. T. F. Cootes, C. J. Taylor, D. H. Cooper, and J. Graham, "Active shape models-Their training and application," Comput. Vis. Image Understanding, vol.61, no.1, pp. 38-59, Jan. 1995.
20. J. R. Rama, F. Tarŕes, and P. Eisert, "Partial PCA in frequency domain," in Proc. 50th Int. Symp. ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, Sep. 2008, vol.2, pp. 463-466.
21. J.-H. Ahn and J.-H. Oh, "A constrained EM algorithm for principal component analysis," Neural Comput. no.15, pp. 57-65, 2003. (Pubitemid 37049833)
22. D. Skocaj, A. Leonardis, and H. Bischof, "Weighted and robust learning of subspace representations," Pattern Recognit., vol.40, no.5, pp. 1556-1569, May 2007. (Pubitemid 46123384)
23. M. E. Tipping and C. M. Bishop, "Probabilistic principal component analysis," J. R. Statist. Soc., vol.61, pp. 611-622, 1999.
24. D. J. Williams and M. Shah, "A fast algorithm for active contours and curvature estimation," CVGIP: Image Understanding, vol.55, no.1, pp. 14-26, 1992.
25. A. A. Amini, T. E. Weymouth, and R. C. Jain, "Using dynamic programming for solving variational problems in vision," IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol.12, no.9, pp. 855-866, Sep. 1990.
26. M. Bergtholdt and C. Schnörr, "Shape priors and online appearance learning for variational segmentation and object recognition in static scenes," in Proc. 27th DAGM Symp. Pattern Recognit. (Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci.). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2005, vol.3663, pp. 342-350. (Pubitemid 41520673)
27. P. J. Burt and E. H. Adelson, "The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol.COM-31, no.4, pp. 532-540, Apr. 1983.
28. M. Kass, A.Witkin, and D.Terzopoulos, "Snakes:Active contour models," Int. J. Comput. Vis., vol.1, no.4, pp. 321-331, 1987.
29. L. Ibanez, W. Schroeder, L. Ng, and J. Cates. (2005). The ITK Software Guide. (2nd ed.). ISBN 1-930934-15-7 [Online]. Available: http://www.itk.org/ ItkSoftwareGuide.pdf