Multiple forms of appropriation in self-monitoring technology: Reflections on the role of evaluation in future self-care

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 537-561

  Storni, Cristiano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMESTIC ENVIRONMENTS; ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; PATIENT EMPOWERMENTS; SELF-CARE; SELF-MONITORING; SELF-MONITORING TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGICAL DETERMINISM;

PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 77951268992     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: 15327590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10447311003720001     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Anderson, R. M., & Funnell, M. M. (2000). Compliance and adherence are dysfunctional concepts in diabetes care. The Diabetes Educator, 26, 597.
2. Bannon, J. L. (1996). Use, design and evaluation: Steps toward an integration. Human Factors in Information Technology, 12, 423-444.
3. Berg, M. (1997). Problems and promises of the protocol. Social Science and Medicine, 44, 1081-1088.
4. Boehner, K., Vertesi, J., Sengers, P., & Dourish, P. (2007). How HCI interprets the probes. Proceedings of CHI 2007, 1077-1087.
5. Boivin, A., Legare, F., & Lehoux, P. (2008). Decision technologies as normative instruments: exposing the values within. Patient Education and Counselling, 73, 426-430.
6. Britten, N. (1994). Patients' ideas about medicine: A qualitative study in a general practice population. British Journal of General Practice, 44, 465-468.
7. Campbell, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Haines, A., Kinmonth, A. L., Sandercock, P., Spiegelhalter, D., et al. (2000). Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal, 321, 694-696.
8. Campbell, N. C., Murray, E., Darbyshire, J., Emery, J., Farmer, A., Griffiths, F., et al. (2007). Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. British Medical Journal, 334, 455-459.
9. Carroll, J. (2002). A field study of perceptions and use of mobile telephones by 16 to 11 years old: A field study. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4(2), 49-62.
10. Carroll, J., Howard, S., Peck, J., & Murphy, J. (2003). From adoption to use: The process of appropriating a mobile phone. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 10(2), 38-48.
11. Ciborra, C., & Hanseth, O. (2000). Introduction: From control to drift. In C. Ciborra et al. (Eds.), From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infrastructures (pp. 1-11). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Conrad, P. (1985). The meaning of medications: Another look at compliance. Social Science and Medicine, 20, 29-37.
13. Crabtree, A., Hamming, T., Rodden, T., Cheverst, K., Clarke, K., Dewsbury, G., et al. (2003). Designing with care: Adapting cultural probes to inform design in sensitive settings. OzCHI Conference Proceedings, 4-13.
14. Crenner, C. (1998). Introduction of the blood pressure cuff into U.S. medical practice: Technology and skilled practice. Annals of Internal Medicine, 128, 488-493.
15. Croissant, J. (2004). The bodybuilder's pharmacy. In Eglash, R., Croissant, J., DiChirio, G., & Fouché, R. (Eds.), Appropriating technology. Vernacular science and social power (pp. 33-49). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16. De Laet,M., & Mol, A., (2000). The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30, 225-263.
17. Dix, A. (2007). Designing for appropriation. Proceedings of the 21st BCS HCI Group Conference, 2, 27-30.
18. Donovan J. L., & Blake, D. R. (1992). Patient non-compliance: Deviance or reasoned decision-making? Social Science Medicine, 34, 507-513.
19. Dourish, P. (2003). The appropriation of interactive technologies: Some lesson from placeless documents. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12, 465-490.
20. Eglash, R., Croissant, J., Di Chirio, G., & Fouché, R. (Eds.). (2004). Appropriating technology. Vernacular science and social power. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21. Gaver,W., Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. interactions, 6(1), 21-29.
22. Gershenfeld, N. (2005). FAB-The coming revolution on your desktop-From personal computer to personal fabrication. New York: Basic Book.
23. Giacomini, M., Hurley, J., Gold, I., Smith, P., & Abelson, J. (2004). The policy analysis of "value talk": Lessons from Canadian health reform. Health Policy, 67, 15-24.
24. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategy for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
25. Haddon, L., Mante, E., Sapio, B., Kommonen, K.-H., Fortunati, L., & Kant, A. (Eds.). (2005). Everyday innovators: Researching the role of users in shaping ICTs. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
26. Helman, C. G. (1981). "'Tonic," "fuel" and "food": Social and symbolic aspects of the longterm use of psychotropic drugs. Social Science Medicine, 15, 521-533.
27. Henderson, A., & Kyng, M. (1991). There's no place like home: Continuing design in use. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems (pp. 219-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Herstatt, C., & Von Hippel, E. (1992). From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a "low tech" field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 213-221.
29. Jones, D. R. (1979). Drugs and prescribing: What the patient thinks. Journal of General Practice, 29, 417-419.
30. Leadbeater, C. (2006). The user innovation revolution. How business can unlock the value of customers' ideas. National Consumer Council. Available from http://collections.europarchive.org/tna/20080804145057/http:/www.ncc.org.uk/nccpdf/poldocs/NCC112ft_innovation_revolution.pdf
31. Leadbeater, C., & Miller, P. (2004). The Pro-Am revolution. How enthusiasts are changing our economy and society. London: Demos. Available from http://www.demos.co.uk/files/proamrevolutionfinal.pdf?1240939425
32. Lehoux, P. (2006). The problem of health technology-Policy implications for modern health care systems. New York: Routledge.
33. Lehoux, P., & Williams-Jones, B. (2007).Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 23(1), 9-16.
34. Lemhachheche, R. (2005). Design for appropriation of ubiquity in information systems. International Reports on Socio-Informatics, 2(2), 60-63. Available from http://www.iisi.de/fileadmin/IISI/upload/IRSI/IRSIv2i2.pdf
35. MacKay, H., & Gillespie, G. (1992). Extending the social shaping of technology approach: Ideology and appropriation. Social Studies of Science, 22(4), 685-716.
36. MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1999). The social shaping of technology. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. (Original work published 1985)
37. MacLean, A., Carter, K., Lestrand, L., & Moran, T. (1990). User-tailorable systems: Pressing the issues with buttons. Proceedings of CHI 1990, 175-182.
38. Mamykina, L., Mynatt, E. D., & Kaufman, D. R. (2006). Investigating health management practices of individuals with diabetes. Proceedings of CHI 2006, 927-936.
39. Medical Research Council. (2000). A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Author.
40. Mol, A. (2006). Proving or improving: On health care research as a form of self-reflection. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 405-414.
41. Molewijk, A. C., Stiggelbout A. M., Otten, W., Dupuis, H.M., & Kievit. (2004). Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: A plea for integrated empirical ethics research. Health Care Analysis, 11, 69-92.
42. Moran, T. P. (2002). Everyday adaptive design. Proceedings of DIS 2002, 13-14.
43. Morgan, M., & Watkins, C. J. (1988). Managing hypertension: Beliefs and responses to medication among cultural groups. Sociology of Health & Illness, 10(4), 561-578.
44. Orel, T. (1995) Designing self-diagnostic devices, in Buchanan, R. and Margolin, V. (eds.) Discovering Design, The university of Chicago Press, Chicago.
45. Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404-428.
46. Osterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005). Adherence to medication. New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 487-497.
47. Randell, R. (2003). User customization of medical devices: The reality and the possibilities. Cognition, Technology and Work, 5, 163-170.
48. Randell, R. (2004). Accountable technology appropriation and use. Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 161-170.
49. Randell, R., & Johnson, C. (2002). User adaptation of medical devices. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Human Decision Making and Control, 105-109.
50. Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51. Roberson, M. H. B. (1992). The meaning of compliance: Patient perspectives. Qualitative Health Research, 2(1), 7-26.
52. Robinson, M. (1993). Design for unanticipated use. Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 187-199.
53. Scarce, M. (2004). Anal sex and the female condom: Are gay men getting a bum wrap? In R. Eglash, Croissant, J., DiChirio, G., & Fouché, R. (Eds.), Appropriating technology. Vernacular science and social power.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 63-78.
54. Schneider, A. (2003). On "appropriation." A critical review of the concept and its application in global art practices. Social Anthropology, 11, 215-229.
55. Silverstone, R., & Hirsch E. (Eds.). (1992). Consuming technologies. Media and information in domestic spaces. New York: Routledge.
56. Suchman, L. (1986). Plans and situated action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Turner, B. S. (1987). Medical power and social knowledge. London: Sage.
58. Verbeek-Heida P. M. (1992). How patients look at drug therapy: Consequences for therapy negotiations in medical consultations. Family Practice, 10, 326-329.
59. Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratising innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Wagner, I., & Balka, H. (2005). Supporting configuring as appropriation work. International Reports on Socio-Informatics, 2(2), 85-92. Available from http://www.iisi.de/fileadmin/IISI/upload/IRSI/IRSIv2i2.pdf
61. Whitehead, A. N. (1925). An enquiry concerning the principle of natural knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
62. Williams, R. & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25, 865-899.
63. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computer and cognition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
64. Yarows, S. A., Julius, S., & Pickering, T. G. (2000). Home blood pressure monitoring. Archive of Internal Medicine, 160, 1251-1257.