Some things you should know about structural equation modeling but never thought to ask

Journal of Consumer Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 221-225

  Fabrigar, Leandre R ^a   Porter, Ronald D ^a   Norris, Meghan E ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951259207     PISSN: 10577408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Baron R.M., and Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1986) 1173-1182
2. Bollen K.A. Structural equations with latent variables (1989), John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY
3. Browne M.W., and Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods Research 21 2 (1992) 230-258
4. Fabrigar L.R., and Wegener D.T. Structural equation modeling. In: Stevens J.P. (Ed). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 5th ed. (2009), Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY 537-595
5. Fabrigar L.R., Wegener D.T., and MacDonald T.K. Distinguishing between prediction and influence: Multiple processes underlying attitude-behavior consistency. In: Agnew C.R., Carlston D.E., Graziano W.G., and Kelly J.R. (Eds). Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research (2010), Oxford University Press, New York, NY 162-185
6. Fan X., and Sivo S.A. Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components. Structural Equation Modeling 12 3 (2005) 343-367
7. Gorsuch R.L. Factor analysis. 2nd ed. (1983), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
8. Hu L., and Bentler P.M. Fit indexes in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods 3 4 (1998) 424-453
9. Iacobucci D. Everything you always wanted to know about SEM (structural equations modeling) but were afraid to ask. Journal of Consumer Psychology 19 (2009) 673-680
10. Iacobucci D. Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20 (2010) 90-98
11. MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., and Cai L. Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses. Psychological Methods 11 (2006) 19-35
12. MacCallum R.C., Browne M.W., and Sugawara H.M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods 1 (1996) 130-149
13. MacCallum R.C., Widaman K.F., Zhang S., and Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods 4 (1999) 84-99
14. Marsh H.W., Hau K.T., and Wen Z. In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling 11 (2004) 320-341
15. Petty R.E., and Cacioppo J.T. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change (1986), Springer-Verlag, New York, NY
16. Petty R.E., and Wegener D.T. The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In: Chaiken S., and Trope Y. (Eds). Dual-process theories in social psychology (1999), Guilford Press, New York, NY 41-72
17. Velicer W.F., and Fava J.L. Affects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods 3 (1998) 231-251
18. Wegener D.T., and Fabrigar L.R. Analysis and design for nonexperimental data: Addressing causal and noncausal hypotheses. In: Reis H.T., and Judd C.M. (Eds). Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2000), Cambridge University Press, New York 412-450