Prognosis of fracture: Evaluation of predictive accuracy of the FRAX™ algorithm and Garvan nomogram

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 863-871

  Sandhu, S K ^a,b   Nguyen, N D ^a   Center, J R ^a,b,c   Pocock, N A ^b   Eisman, J A ^a,b,c   Nguyen, T V ^a,c  

^a GARVAN INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^b ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Fracture risk; Prognostic models; Validation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; HUMERUS FRACTURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOMOGRAM; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPINE FRACTURE; WRIST FRACTURE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BONE DENSITY; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOMOGRAMS; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PROGNOSIS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 77951255994     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1026-7     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ND Nguyen HG Ahlborg JR Center JA Eisman TV Nguyen 2007 Residual lifetime risk of fractures in women and men J Bone Miner Res 22 781 788 10.1359/jbmr.070315 17352657 (Pubitemid 351339737)
2. EJ Feuer LM Wun CC Boring WD Flanders MJ Timmel T Tong 1993 The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 85 892 897 10.1093/jnci/85.11.892 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3mtVOhtg%3D%3D 8492317 (Pubitemid 23157129)
3. JR Center TV Nguyen D Schneider PN Sambrook JA Eisman 1999 Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study Lancet 353 878 882 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09075-8 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7ptFOlug%3D%3D 10093980 (Pubitemid 29126875)
4. AN Tosteson DJ Gottlieb DC Radley ES Fisher LJ Melton 3rd 2007 Excess mortality following hip fracture: the role of underlying health status Osteoporos Int 18 1463 1472 10.1007/s00198-007-0429-6 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2srosFWluw%3D%3D 17726622 (Pubitemid 47512685)
5. AG Randell TV Nguyen N Bhalerao SL Silverman PN Sambrook JA Eisman 2000 Deterioration in quality of life following hip fracture: a prospective study Osteoporos Int 11 460 466 10.1007/s001980070115 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvgvFektQ%3D%3D 10912850 (Pubitemid 30450131)
6. TV Nguyen JR Center JA Eisman 2004 Osteoporosis: underrated, underdiagnosed and undertreated Med J Aust 180 S18 S22 14984358
7. J Eisman S Clapham L Kehoe 2004 Osteoporosis prevalence and levels of treatment in primary care: the Australian BoneCare Study J Bone Miner Res 19 1969 1975 10.1359/JBMR.040905 15537439 (Pubitemid 41103411)
8. ES Siris YT Chen TA Abbott E Barrett-Connor PD Miller LE Wehren ML Berger 2004 Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures Arch Intern Med 164 1108 1112 10.1001/archinte.164.10.1108 15159268 (Pubitemid 38668990)
9. ND Nguyen JA Eisman JR Center TV Nguyen 2007 Risk factors for fracture in nonosteoporotic men and women J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92 955 962 10.1210/jc.2006-1476 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXjtlGnu7c%3D 17164302 (Pubitemid 46465669)
10. KM Sanders GC Nicholson JJ Watts JA Pasco MJ Henry MA Kotowicz E Seeman 2006 Half the burden of fragility fractures in the community occur in women without osteoporosis. When is fracture prevention cost-effective? Bone 38 694 700 10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.004 16507356
11. SR Cummings MC Nevitt WS Browner K Stone KM Fox KE Ensrud J Cauley D Black TM Vogt 1995 Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group N Engl J Med 332 767 773 10.1056/NEJM199503233321202 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7ms1aktw%3D%3D 7862179
12. ND Nguyen C Pongchaiyakul JR Center JA Eisman TV Nguyen 2005 Identification of high-risk individuals for hip fracture: a 14-year prospective study J Bone Miner Res 20 1921 1928 10.1359/JBMR.050520 16234964 (Pubitemid 41532777)
13. JA Kanis F Borgstrom C De Laet H Johansson O Johnell B Jonsson A Oden N Zethraeus B Pfleger N Khaltaev 2005 Assessment of fracture risk Osteoporos Int 16 581 589 10.1007/s00198-004-1780-5 15616758 (Pubitemid 40897454)
14. ND Nguyen SA Frost JR Center JA Eisman TV Nguyen 2007 Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women Osteoporos Int 18 1109 1117 10.1007/s00198-007-0362-8 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2svmtlaiuw%3D%3D 17370100 (Pubitemid 47020008)
15. ND Nguyen SA Frost JR Center JA Eisman TV Nguyen 2008 Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks Osteoporos Int 19 1431 1444 10.1007/s00198-008-0588-0 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1crnvVehtw%3D%3D 18324342
16. JA Kanis O Johnell A Oden H Johansson E McCloskey 2008 FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK Osteoporos Int 19 385 397 10.1007/s00198-007-0543-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c7nvF2ntA%3D%3D 18292978
17. NA Obuchowski XH Zhou 2002 Prospective studies of diagnostic test accuracy when disease prevalence is low Biostatistics 3 477 492 10.1093/biostatistics/3.4.477 12933593 (Pubitemid 35431225)
18. R Development Core Team 2008 A language and environment for statistical computing 270 R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna http://www.R- project.org R Development Core Team (2008) A language and environment for statistical computing, version 2.7.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org
19. TV Nguyen JR Center JA Eisman 2005 Femoral neck bone loss predicts fracture risk independent of baseline BMD J Bone Miner Res 20 1195 1201 10.1359/JBMR.050215 15940372 (Pubitemid 40863807)
20. F Borgstrom O Johnell JA Kanis B Jonsson C Rehnberg 2006 At what hip fracture risk is it cost-effective to treat? International intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis Osteoporos Int 17 1459 1471 10.1007/s00198-006-0107-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rksVeisA%3D%3D 16847588 (Pubitemid 44387481)
21. DJ Torgerson JA Kanis 1995 Cost-effectiveness of preventing hip fractures in the elderly population using vitamin D and calcium OJM 88 135 139 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3hvFChuw%3D%3D
22. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults 2001 Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) JAMA 285 2486 97 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486
23. PG Gobbi L Baldini C Broglia M Goldaniga M Comelli P Morel E Morra S Cortelazzo R Bettini G Merlini 2005 Prognostic validation of the international classification of immunoglobulin M gammopathies: a survival advantage for patients with immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance? Clin Cancer Res 11 1786 1790 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1899 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXitVKrs74%3D 15756000 (Pubitemid 40471840)
24. GL Wong AY Hui VW Wong FK Chan JJ Sung HL Chan 2005 A retrospective study on clinical features and prognostic factors of biopsy-proven primary biliary cirrhosis in Chinese patients Am J Gastroenterol 100 2205 2211 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.50007.x 16181370 (Pubitemid 43919720)
25. AN Bartley DW Ross 2002 Validation of p53 immunohistochemistry as a prognostic factor in breast cancer in clinical practice Arch Pathol Lab Med 126 456 458 11900572
26. JM Smeenk AM Stolwijk JA Kremer DD Braat 2000 External validation of the Templeton model for predicting success after IVF Hum Reprod 15 1065 1068 10.1093/humrep/15.5.1065 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3kslaqsQ%3D%3D 10783353
27. M Schindl SJ Wigmore EJ Currie F Laengle OJ Garden 2005 Prognostic scoring in colorectal cancer liver metastases: development and validation Arch Surg 140 183 189 10.1001/archsurg.140.2.183 15724001 (Pubitemid 40229110)