Bias in Grading

College Teaching

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 191-192

  Malouff, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

assessment; bias; grading; rubrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951252945     PISSN: 87567555     EISSN: 19308299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.56.3.191-192     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Archer, J., and B. McCarthy. 1988. Personal biases in student assessment. Educational Research 30:142-45.
2. Baron, R. A., and D. Byrne. 2004. Social psychology. 10th ed. Boston: Pearson.
3. Collegeboard.com. 2006. SAT scoring guide.http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/sat/about/sat/essay_scoring.html
4. Dahl, R. 2007. The BFG. London: Puffin.
5. Flash, P. 2006. Creating grading rubrics for writing assignments.http://writing.umn.edu/tww/responding_grading/creating_rubrics.htm
6. Landy, D., and H. Sigall. 1974. Beauty in talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29:299-304.
7. Meyers, D. G. 2005. Social psychology. 8th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
8. Nisbett, R., and L. Ross. 1980. Human inference. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Perlmutter, D. D. 2004. Are we grading on the curves? The Chronicle of Higher Education 51 (16): B13.
10. Quinlan, A. M. 2006. A complete guide to rubrics: Assessment made easy for teachers, K-college. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
11. Stevens, D. D., and A. J. Levy. 2004. Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save time grading, convey effective feedback and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
12. Texas A&M University Writing Center. 2005. Grading and commenting.http://writingcenter.tamu.edu/content/view/39/17/