![]() |
Volumn 152, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 467-469
|
Why can't magnetic resonance imaging reliably diagnose pulmonary embolism?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CONTRAST MEDIUM;
DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;
GADOLINIUM;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
EDITORIAL;
GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE;
HUMAN;
KIDNEY FAILURE;
LUNG ANGIOGRAPHY;
LUNG EMBOLISM;
NEPHROGENIC SYSTEMIC FIBROSIS;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SKIN FIBROSIS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;
METHODOLOGY;
NOTE;
PHLEBOGRAPHY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STANDARD;
GADOLINIUM;
HUMANS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;
PHLEBOGRAPHY;
PULMONARY EMBOLISM;
REFERENCE STANDARDS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 77951244822
PISSN: 00034819
EISSN: 15393704
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-7-201004060-00012 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (6)
|