A Dawning Recognition of Factors for Increasing Donor Registration: The IIFF Model

Understanding Organ Donation: Applied Behavioral Science Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 313-330

  Siegel, Jason T ^a   Alvaro, Eusebio M ^a   Hohman, Zachary P ^a  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Analyzing project outcomes; Assessing donor registration behavior under maximum PBC; Dawning recognition of factors for increasing donor registration; Donor Network of Arizona (DNAZ); Focus groups exploring donors'thoughts concerning registration kiosks; General market radio campaign alerting Tucsonans to kiosks; Registration kiosk not being able to influence perceptions of eligibility; Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951231425     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444317459.ch19     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665-683.
3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Alvaro, E. M., Jones, S. P., Robles, A., & Siegel, J. T. (2005). Predictors of organ donation behaviors among Hispanic Americans. Progress in Transplantation, 15, 149-156.
5. Alvaro, E. M., Jones, S. P., Robles, A. S., & Siegel, J. T. (2006). Hispanic organ donation: Impact of a Spanish-language organ donation campaign. Journal of the National Medical Association, 98, 28-35.
6. Bagozzi, R. P. (1996). The role of arousal in the creation and control of the halo effect in attitude models. Psychology & Marketing, 13, 235-264.
7. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. B. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3-25.
8. Crano, W. D. (1983). Assumed consensus of attitudes: The effect of vested interest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 597-608.
9. Crano, W. D. (1995). Attitude strength and vested interest. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 131-158). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Crano, W. D. (1997). Vested interest, symbolic politics, and attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 485-491.
11. Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2008). Attitudes and attitude change (Frontiers of Social Psychology series). New York: Psychology Press.
12. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13. Gallup Organization. (1993). The American public's attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation. Princeton, NJ: Gallup Organization.
14. Gallup Organization. (2005-2006). 2005 national survey of organ and tissue donation attitudes and behaviors. Washington, DC: Gallup Organization.
15. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., et al. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308-318.
16. Hirschberger, G., Ein-Dor, T., & Almakias, S. (2008). The self-protective altruist: Terror management and the ambivalent nature of prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 666-678.
17. Isen, A. M. (1970). Success, failure, attention, and reactions to others: The warm glow of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 294-301.
18. Parisi, N., & Katz, I. (1986). Attitudes toward posthumous organ donation and commitment to donate. Health Psychology, 5, 565-580.
19. Sanner, M. A., Hedman, H., & Tufveson, G. (1995). Evaluation of an organ-donor-card campaign in Sweden. Clinical Transplantation, 9, 326-333.
20. Siegel, J. T., Alvaro, E. M., & Jones, S. P. (2005). Organ donor registration preferences among Hispanic populations: Which modes of registration have the greatest promise? Health Education and Behavior, 32, 242-252.
21. Siegel, J. T., Alvaro, E., Lac, A., Crano, W. D., & Alexander, S. (2008). Intentions of becoming a living organ donor among Hispanics: A theoretical approach exploring differences between living and non-living organ donation. Journal of Health Communication, 13, 80-99.
22. Siegel, J. T., Alvaro, E., Crano, W. C., Lac, A. Ting, S., & Pace Jones, S. (2008). A quasiexperimental investigation of message appeal variations on organ donor registration rates. Health Psychology, 27, 170-178.
23. Smith, S. W., Morrison, K., Kopfman, J. E., & Ford, L. A. (1994). The influence of prior thought and intent on the memorability and persuasiveness of organ donation message strategies. Health Communication, 6, 1-20.
24. Thompson, M., Zanna, M., & Griffin, D. (1995). Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Trafimow, D., Sheeran, P., Conner, M., & Finlay, K. A. (2002). Evidence that perceived behavioural control is a multidimensional construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 101-121.
26. Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Corrigan, C. (2007). Real donors, real consent: Testing the theory of reasoned action on organ donor consent. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 2435-2450.
27. Winkel, F. W. (1984). Public communication on donor cards: A comparison of persuasive styles. Social Science and Medicine, 19, 957-963.
28. Yzer, M. C., Hennessy, M., & Fishbein, M. (2004). The usefulness of perceived difficulty for health research. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 9(2), 149-162.