Enhancements of pest risk analysis techniques

EPPO Bulletin

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 107-120

  Schrader, G ^a   MacLeod, A ^b   Mittinty, M ^c   Brunel, S ^d   Kaminski, K ^a   Kehlenbeck, H ^a   Petter, F ^d   Baker, R ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PATHOGEN DIAGNOSTICS   (Germany)

^b FOOD AND ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH AGENCY   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^d European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 77951215363     PISSN: 02508052     EISSN: 13652338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2009.02360.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Likert scales. 2009, http://www.statistics.com/resources/glossary/l/likertsc.php, [Accessed on 7 February 2009]
2. Baker R, MacLeod A. Pest risk assessments: tools, resources and key challenges. 2005, 106-109. In: IPPC Secretariat , Proceedings of the workshop on alien species and the International Plant Protection Convention, Braunschweig, Germany, 22-26 September 2003, pp, FAO, Rome (IT), xii + 301 pp
3. Baker R, Cannon R, Bartlett P, Barker I. Novel strategies for assessing and managing the risks posed by invasive alien species to global crop production and biodiversity. Annals of Applied Biology 2005, 146:177-191.
4. Baker RHA, Black R, Copp GH, Haysom KA, Hulme PE, Thomas MB, Brown A, Brown M, Cannon RJC, Ellis J, Ellis M, Ferris R, Glaves P, Gozlan RE, Holt J, Howe L, Knight JD, MacLeod A, Moore NP, Mumford JD, Murphy ST, Parrott D, Sansford CE, Smith GC, St-Hilaire S, Ward NL. The UK risk assessment scheme for all non-native species. Neobiota Series 2008, ISSN: 1681-5947
5. Baker R, Battisti A, Bremmer J, Kenis M, Mumford J, Petter F, Schrader G, Bacher S, De Barro P, Hulme PE, Karadjova O, Lansink AO, Pruvost O, Pyšek P, Roques A, Baranchikov Y, Sun J-H. PRATIQUE: a research project to enhance pest risk analysis techniques in the European Union. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 2009, 39:87-93.
6. Beyth-Marom R. How probable is probable? A numeric translation of verbal probability expressions. Journal of Forecasting 1982, 1:257-269.
7. Budescu DV, Wallsten TS. Consistency in interpretation of probabilsitic phrases. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 1985, 36:391-405.
8. Daehler CC, Carino DA. Predicting invasive plants: prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biological Invasions 2000, 2:93-102.
9. Daehler CC, Denslow JS, Ansari S, Kuo H. A risk assessment system for screening out invasive pest plants from Hawaii and other Pacific islands. Conservation Biology 2004, 18:360-368.
10. Dalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science 1963, 9:458-467.
11. Guidance Document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for the Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Plants and derived Food and Feed. The EFSA Journa 2006, 1-94. EFSA, ) European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), l 2004-99, pp
12. Pest Risk Assessment: Science in Support of Phytosanitary Decision-making in the European Community 2008, Summary report of an EFSA scientific colloquium, No. , 06-07 December 2007, EFSA, Parma (IT)
13. Guide to the International Plant Protection Convention 2002, FAO, Rome (IT)
14. International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures 1 to 31 2008, 2008 edn, FAO, Rome (IT)
15. Gordon DR, Onderdonk DA, Fox AM, Stocker RK. Consistent accuracy of the Australian weed risk assessment system across varied geographies. Diversity and Distributions 2008a, 14:234-242.
16. Gordon DR, Onderdonk DA, Fox AM, Stocker RK, Gantz C. Predicting invasive plants in Florida using the Australian Weed Risk Assessment. Invasive Plant Science and Management 2008b, 1:178-195.
17. Ilbery B, Maye D, Kneafsey M, Jenkins T, Walkley C. Forecasting food supply chain developments in lagging rural regions: evidence from the UK. Journal of Rural Studies 2004, 20:331-344.
18. International Plant Protection Convention, new revised text. 1997, http://www.ippc.int, IPPC, FAO, Rome (IT). [Accessed on 1 February 2010]
19. Guidance Notes for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on Addressing Uncertainties. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2005, http://ipcc-g1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4_UncertaintyGuidanceNote.pdf, [Accessed on 1 February 2010]
20. Jablonowski M. Communicating risk. Words or numbers? Risk Management 1994, 41:47-50.
21. Kato H, Hata K, Yamamoto H, Yoshioka T. Effectiveness of the weed risk assessment system for the Bonin Islands. Assessment and Control of Biological Invasion Risk 2006, 65-72. Koike F, Clout MN, Kawamichi M, De Poorter MIwatsuki K. In, ed, pp, Shoukadoh Book Sellers, Kyoto, Japan, IUCN, Gland (CH)
22. Krivánek M, PyÍek P. Predicting invasions by woody species in a temperate zone: a test of three risk assessment schemes in the Czech Republic (Central Europe). Diversity and Distributions 2006, 12:319-327.
23. MacLeod A, Baker RHA. The EPPO pest risk assessment scheme: assigning descriptions to scores for entry and establishment questions. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 2003, 33:313-320.
24. Pest risk assessment scheme. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 1997, 27:281-305.
25. uidelines on Pest Risk Analysis: Decision-support scheme for quarantine pests EPPO Standard PM 5/3(3). 2007, http://archives.eppo.org/EPPOStandards/PM5_PRA/PRA_scheme_2007.doc, OEPP/EPPO, G, EPPO, Paris (FR). [Accessed on 1 February 2010]
26. Pheloung P. Determining the weed potential of new plant introductions to Australia. 1995, 26. pp, Agriculture Protection Board Report, West Australian Department of Agriculture, Perth (AU)
27. Rowe G, Wright G. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting 1999, 15:353-375.
28. Theil M. The role of translations of verbal into numerical probability expressions in risk management: a meta-analysis. Journal of Risk Research 2002, 5:177-186.
29. Guidelines for pathway-initiated pest risk assessments. 2000, US Dept. of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, version 5.02, October 2000
30. Williamson M. Invasions. Ecography 1999, 22:5-12.
31. Agreement on the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures, (the SPS Agreement). The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts 1995, In, WTO Secretariat, Geneva (CH)