Erratum to Time optimal control of an additional food provided predator-prey system with applications to pest management and biological conservation (J. Math. Biol., 10.1007/s00285-009-0279-2);Time optimal control of an additional food provided predator-prey system with applications to pest management and biological conservation

Journal of Mathematical Biology

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 591-613

  Srinivasu, P D N ^a   Prasad, B S R V ^a  

^a ANDHRA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Additional food; Bang bang; Biological control; Conservation; Mayer problem; Multiple switches; Optimal time; Pest eradication; Predator; Prey

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL; CATERING SERVICE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; METHODOLOGY; PREDATION; TIME;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; FOOD SUPPLY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PEST CONTROL, BIOLOGICAL; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77951212862     PISSN: 03036812     EISSN: 14321416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00285-009-0301-8     Document Type: Erratum

References (20)

1. Belovsky GE, Schmitz OJ (1994) Plant defenses and optimal foraging by mammalian herbivores. J Mammal 75(4): 816-832.
2. Bilde T, Toft S (1998) Quantifying food limitation of arthropod predators in the field. Oecologia 115: 54-58.
3. Birkhoff G, Rota GC (1982) Ordinary differential equations. Ginn, Boston.
4. Cesari L (1983) Optimization-theory and appplications: problems with ordinary differential equations. Applications of Mathematics Series, vol 17. Springer, New York.
5. Clark CW (2005) Mathematical bioeconomics-the optimal management of renewable resoruces. Wiley, New Jersey.
6. Coll M, Guershon M (2002) Omnivoryin terrestrial arthropods: mixing plant and prey diets. Annu Rev Entomol 47: 267-297.
7. Harmon JP (2003) Indirect interactions among a generalist predator and its multiple foods. Ph. D thesis, St. Paul, MN, University of Minnesota.
8. Harwood JD, Sunderland KD, Symondson WOC (2004) Prey selection by linyphiid spiders: molecular tracking of the effects of alternative prey on rates of aphid consumption in the field. Mol Ecol 13: 3549-3560.
9. Harwood JD, Sunderland KD, Symondson WOC (2005a) Monoclonal antibodies reveal the potential of the tetragnathids spider Pachygnatha degeeri (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) as an aphid predator. Bull Entomol Res 95: 161-167.
10. Harwood JD, Obrycki JJ (2005b) The role of alternative prey in sustaining predator populations. In: Hoddle MS (ed) Proc. second int. symp. biol. control of arthropods, vol II, pp 453-462.
11. Murdoch WW, Chesson J, Chesson PL (1985) Biological control in theory and practice. Am Nat 125(3): 344-366.
12. Penney BK (2002) Lowered nutritional quality supplements nudibranch chemical defense. Oecologia 132: 411-418.
13. Sabelis MW, van Rijn PCJ (2005) When does alternative food promote biological pest control? In: Hoddle MS (ed) Proc. second int. symp. biol. control of arthropods, vol II, pp 428-437.
14. Shannon PS, Chrzanowski TH, Grover JP (2007) Prey food quality affects flagellate ingestion rates. Microb Ecol 53: 66-73.
15. Srinivasu PDN, Prasad BSRV, Venkatesulu M (2007) Biological control through provision of additional food to predators: a theoretical study. Theor Popul Biol 72: 111-120.
16. Toft S (2005) The quality of aphids as food for generalist predators: implications for natural control of aphids. Eur J Entomol 102(3): 371-383.
17. van Baalen M, Křivan V, van Rijn PCJ, Sabelis MW (2001) Alternative food, switching predators, and the Persistence of Predator-Prey Systems. Am Nat 157(5): 512-524.
18. van Rijn PCJ, van Houten YM, Sabelis MW (2002) How plants benefit from providing food to predators even when it is also edible to herbivores. Ecology 83: 2664-2679.
19. Wade MR, Zalucki MP, Wrateen SD, Robinson KA (2008) Conservation biological control of arthropods using artificial food sprays: Current staus and future challenges. Biol Control 45: 185-199.
20. Wootton JT (1994) The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 25: 443-466.