Visual noise selectively degrades vision in migraine

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 2294-2299

  Wagner, Doreen ^a   Manahilov, Velitchko ^a   Loffler, Gunter ^a   Gordon, Gael E ^a   Dutton, Gordon N ^a  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNALIZATION; LUMINANCE; MALE; MIGRAINE WITH AURA; MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA; NERVE CELL; NOISE; PAIN THRESHOLD; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; VISUAL DISORDER;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIGRAINE WITH AURA; MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA; NOISE; QUESTIONNAIRES; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77951211317     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4318     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Lipton RB, Bigal ME. Ten lessons on the epidemiology of migraine. Headache. 2007;47:S2-S9.
2. Moore A, McQuay H. Migraine special issue. Bandolier Extra. January 2002:1-12.
3. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68:343-349.
4. Vincent M, Hadjikhani N. Migraine aura and related phenomena: beyond scotomata and scintillations. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:1368-1377.
5. Mulleners WM, Chronicle EP, Palmer JE, Koehler PJ, Vredeveld JW. Visual cortex excitability in migraine with and without aura. Headache. 2001;41:565-572.
6. Welch KMA, Dandrea G, Tepley N, Barkley G, Ramadan NM. The concept of migraine as a state of central neuronal hyperexcitability. Neurol Clin. 1990;8:817-828.
7. McColl SL, Wilkinson F. Visual contrast gain control in migraine: measures of visual cortical excitability and inhibition. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:74-84.
8. McKendrick AM, Vingrys AJ, Badcock DR, Heywood JT. Visual dysfunction between migraine events. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:626-633.
9. Barlow H. The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns. Vision Res. 1978;18:637-650.
10. Pelli DG. The quantum efficiency of vision. In Blakemore C, ed. Visual Coding and Efficiency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990: 3-24.
11. Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia. 2004:1-160.
12. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Swayer J, Edmeads JG. Clinical utility of an instrument assessing migraine disability: the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire. Headache. 2001;41:854-861.
13. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Downson AJ, Swayer J, Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001;56: S20-S28.
14. Pelli D, Zhang L. Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays. Vision Res. 1991;31:1337-1350.
15. Legge GE, Kersten D, Burgess AE. Contrast discrimination in noise. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1987;4:391-404.
16. Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am. 1970;49:467-477.
17. Burgess AE, Colborne B. Visual signal-detection: observer inconsistency. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1988;5:617-627.
18. Tolhurst DJ, Movshon JA, Dean AF. The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual-cortex. Vision Res. 1983;23:775-785.
19. Lu Z, Dosher BA. Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1999;16:764-778.
20. Weibull, W. Statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech. 1951: 292-299.
21. Quick RF. Vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. Kybernetik. 1974;16:65-67.
22. Watson AB. Probability summation over time. Vision Res. 1979; 19:515-522.
23. Judd C, McClelland G.H. Data Analysis: a Model Comparison Approach. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich-Routledge Publishers; 1989.
24. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR. Motion processing deficits in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2004;24:363-372.
25. Antal A, Temme J, Nitsche MA, Varga ET, Lang N, Paulus W. Altered motion perception in migraineurs: evidence for interictal cortical hyperexcitability. Cephalalgia. 2005;25:788-794.
26. Chronicle E, Mulleners W. Might migraine damage the brain. Cephalalgia. 1994;14:415-418.
27. Tolhurst DJ, Movshon JA, Thompson ID. The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical-neurons on stimulus contrast. Exp Brain Res. 1981;41:414-419.
28. Stankewitz A, May A. Cortical excitability and migraine. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:1454-1456.
29. Sperling AJ, Lu ZL, Manis FR, Seidenberg MS. Deficits in perceptual noise exclusion in developmental dyslexia. Nature Neurosci. 2005;8:862-863.
30. Sperling AJ, Lu ZL, Manis FR, Seidenberg MS. Motion-perception deficits and reading impairment: it's the noise, not the motion. Psychol Sci. 2006;17:1047-1053.
31. Ziegler JC, Pech-Georgel C, George F, Alario F-X, Lorenzi C. Deficits in speech perception predict language learning impairment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:14110-14115.
32. Chait M, Eden G, Poeppel D, Simon JZ, Hill DF, Flowers DL. Delayed detection of tonal targets in background noise in dyslexia.Brain Lang. 2007;102:80-90.