Decreased lung carcinoma cell density on select polymer nanometer surface features for lung replacement therapies

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 269-275

  Zhang, Lijuan ^a   Chun, Young Wook ^b   Webster, Thomas J ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Brown University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Lung carcinoma; Nanotechnology; Nanotopography

Indexed keywords

CHLOROFORM; DIMETICONE; NANOMATERIAL; POLYGLACTIN; POLYMER; POLYSTYRENE;

ARTICLE; CARCINOMA CELL; CELL DENSITY; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPITHELIUM CELL; EVAPORATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LUNG CARCINOMA; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL SURVIVAL; CRYSTALLIZATION; HUMANS; LACTIC ACID; LUNG NEOPLASMS; LUNG TRANSPLANTATION; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PARTICLE SIZE; POLYGLYCOLIC ACID; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 77951202642     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Liu H, Webster TJ. Nanomedicine for implants: A review of studies and necessary experimental tools. Biomaterials. 2007;28(2):354-369.
2. Vogel V, Sheetz M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(4):265-275.
3. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Sutherland DS, Agheli H, Curtis ASG. Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nano-columns produced by colloidal lithography. Biomaterials. 2004;25(23):5415-5422.
4. Nomura S, Kojima H, Ohyabu Y, Kuwabara K, Miyauchi A, Uemura T. Cell culture on nanopillar sheet: Study of He La cells on nanopillar sheet. J Artif Organs. 2006;9(2):90-96.
5. Turner S, Kam L, Isaacson M, Craighead HG, Shain W, Turner J. Cell attachment on silicon nanostructures. J Vac Sci Technol B. 1997;15(6): 2848-2854.
6. Charest JL, Garcia AJ, King WP. Myoblast alignment and differentiation on cell culture substrates with microscale topography and model chemistries. Biomaterials. 2007;28(13):2202-2210.
7. Wood MA, Wilkinson CD, Curtis AS. The effects of colloidal nanotopography on initial fibroblast adhesion and morphology. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2006;5(1):20-31.
8. Dalby MJ, Pasqui D, Affrossman S. Cell response to nano-islands produced by polymer demixing: A brief review. IEE Proc Nanobiotechnol. 2004;151(2):53-61.
9. Yim EK, Reano RM, Pang SW, Yee AF, Chen CS, Leong KW. Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials. 2005;26(26):5405-5413.
10. Zhu B, Lu Q, Yin J, Hu J, Wang Z. Alignment of osteoblast-like cells and cell-produced collagen matrix induced by nanogrooves. Tissue Eng. 2005;11(5-6):825-834.
11. Coletti D, Teodori L, Albertini MC, et al. Static magnetic fields enhance skeletal muscle differentiation in vitro by improving myoblast alignment. Cytometry A. 2007;71(10):846-856.
12. Charest JL, Garcia AJ, King WP. Myoblast alignment and differentiation on cell culture substrates with microscale topography and model chemistries. Biomaterials. 2007;28(13):2202-2210.
13. Arnold M, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Glass R, et al. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. Chemphyschem. 2004;5(3):383-388.
14. Choi CH, Hagvall SH, Wu BM, Dunn JCY, Beygui RE, Kim CJ. Cell interaction with three-dimensional sharp-tip nanotopography. Biomaterials. 2007;28(9):1672-1679.
15. Tzvetkova-Chevolleau T, Stephanou A, Fuard D, Ohayon J, Schiavone P, Tracqui P. The motility of normal and cancer cells in response to the combined influence of the substrate rigidity and anisotropic microstructure. Biomaterials. 2008;29(10):1541-1551.
16. Berry CC, Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Affrossman S. The fibroblast response to tubes exhibiting internal nanotopography. Biomaterials. 2005;26(24):4985-4992.
17. George PA, Donose BC, Cooper-White JJ. Self-assembling polystyreneblock-poly(ethylene oxide) copolymer surface coatings: Resistance to protein and cell adhesion. Biomaterials. 2009;30(13):2449-2456.
18. Liu H, Webster TJ. Nanomedicine for implants: A review of studies and necessary experimental tools. Biomaterials. 2006;28(2):354-369.
19. Tzvetkova-Chevolleau T, Stephanou A, Fuard D, Ohayon J, Schiavone P, Tracqui P. The motility of normal and cancer cells in response to the combined influence of the substrate rigidity and anisotropic microstructure. Biomaterials. 29(10):1541-1551.
20. World Health Organization. Cancer. 2009. Accessed from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en. Accessed on January 10, 2010.
21. Carpenter J, Khang D, Webster TJ. Nanometer polymer surface features: The influence on surface energy, protein adsorption and endothelial cell adhesion. Nanotechnology. 2008;19(50):505103.
22. Lee JY, Kang BS, Hicks B, et al. The control of cell adhesion and viability by zinc oxide nanorods. Biomaterials. 2008;29(27):3743-3749.