Detecting relationships among categories using text classification

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1046-1061

  Mengle, Saket S R ^a   Goharian, Nazli ^b  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT HIERARCHIES; DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION; FEATURE SELECTION; MISCLASSIFICATIONS; OPEN DIRECTORY; RELATIONSHIP NETWORKS; SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS; TEXT CLASSIFICATION;

FEATURE EXTRACTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 77951201695     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21297     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Cai, L., & Hofmann, T. (2007). Exploiting known taxonomies in learning overlapping concepts. In M. Veloso (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (pp. 714-719). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
2. Callan, J. (1994). Passage retrieval evidence in document retrieval. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 302-310). New York: ACM Press.
3. Chuang, S., & Chien, L. (2005). Taxonomy generation for text segments: A practical web-based approach. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 23(4), 363-396.
4. Dhillon, I. (200.1). Co-clustering documents and words using bipartite spectral graph partitioning. In. Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge discovery and Data Mining (pp. 269-274). New York: ACM Press.
5. Dhillon, I., Mallela, S., & Modha, D. (2003). Information-theoretic coclustering. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 89-98). New York: ACM Press.
6. Donner, M. (2003). Toward a security ontology. IEEE Security and Privacy, 1(2), 6-7.
7. Dumais, S., & Chen, H. (2000). Hierarchical classification of Web content. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 256-263). New York: ACM.
8. Fisher, D. (1987). Knowledge acquisition via incremental conceptual clustering. Machine Learning, 2(2), 139-172.
9. Gao, B., Liu, T, Cheng, Q., Feng, G., Qin, T, & Ma, W. (2005). Hierarchical taxonomy preparation for text categorization using consistent bipartite spectral graph co-partitioning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(9), 139-172.
10. Gennari, J., Langley, P., & Fisher, D. (1990). Models of incremental concept formation. In J.G. Carboneil, ed., Machine Learning: Paradigms and Methods (pp. 1.1-62). New York: Elsevier.
11. Goharian, N., & Mengle, S. (2008). On document splitting in passage detection. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 833-834). New York: ACM Press.
12. Han, J., & Fu, Y (1995, September). Discovery of multiple-level association rules from large databases. Paper presented at the 21st International Conference on Very Large Databases, Zurich, Switzerland.
13. Han, J., & Kamber, M. (2006). Data mining: Concepts and techniques (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
14. Han, E., & Karypis, G. (2005). Feature-based recommendation system. In Proceedings of the 14th. ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 446-452). New York: ACM Press.
15. Hearst, M. (1994). Multi-paragraph segmentation of expository text. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 9-16). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. Kuo, H., Lai, H., & Jen-Peng, H. (2008). Building a concept hierarchy automatically and its measuring. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (pp. 3975-3978). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
17. Lopez V., Pasin, M., & Motta, E. (2005). AquaLog: An ontology-portable question answering system, for the semantic web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3532/2005, 546-562.
18. Mengle, S., & Goharian, N. (2009a). Ambiguity measure feature selection algorithm.. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(5), 1037-1050.
19. Mengle, S., & Goharian, N. (2009b). Passage detection using text classification. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 814-825.
20. Mengle, S., Goharian, N., & Platt, A. (2008). Discovering relationships among categories using misclassification information. In Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 932-937). New York: ACM Press.
21. Mladenic, D., & Grobelnik, M. (1998, June). Feature selection for classification based on text hierarchy. Paper presented at the Conference on Automated Learning and Discovery (CONALD), Pittsburgh, PA.
22. Moldovan, D., & Girju, R. (2001). An. interactive tool for the rapid development of knowledge bases. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 10(1), 1-2.
23. Morin, E. (1999, August). Automatic acquisition, of semantic relations between terms from technical corpora. Paper presented at the Fifth International Congress on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, Innsbruck, Austria.
24. Navigli, R., Velardi, P., & Gangemi, A. (2003). Ontology learning and its application to automated terminology translation. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 18(1), 22-31.
25. Papatheodorou, C., Vassiliou A., & Simon, B. (2002). Discovery of ontologies for learning resources using word-based clustering. In Proceedings of the World Conference Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecomm (ERIC doc. ED477079). Washington, DC: ERIC Project.
26. Punera, K., Rajan, S., & Ghosh, J. (2005). Automatically learning document taxonomy for hierarchical classification. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1010-1011). New York: ACM Press.
27. Rubin, D., Hewett, M., Oliver, D., Klein, T, & Altman, R. (2002). Automatic data acquisition into ontologies from pharmacogenetics relational data sources using declarative object definitions and XML. In Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biology (pp. 88-99). La Jolla, CA: ISCB.
28. Srikant, R., & Agrawal, R. (1995). Mining generalized association rules. In U.D. Dayal, P.M.D. Gray, & S. Nishio (Eds.), InVLDB'95, Proceedings of 21th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (pp. 407-419). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
29. Suryanto, H., & Compton, P. (2001). Discovery of ontologies from, knowledge bases. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on. Knowledge Capture (pp. 171-178). New York: ACM Press.
30. Tho, Q.T., Hui, S.C, Fang, A.C.M., & Cao, T.H. (2006). Automatic fuzzy ontology generation for semantic web. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 18(4), 842-856.
31. Vapnik, V. (1998). Statistical learning theory. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
32. Vural, V, & Dy, J. (2004). A hierarchical method for multi-class support vector machines. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 105-113). Trier, Germany: International Society on Machine Learning.
33. Zhu, S., Xu, W., & Gong, Y. (2005). Multilabelled classification using maximum entropy method. In Proceedings of the 28th. Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 274-281). New York: ACM Press.
34. Ziegler, C-N., Simon, K., & Lausen, G. (2006). Automatic computation of semantic proximity using taxonomy knowledge. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM international Conference on. Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 465-474). New York: ACM Press.