Evolutionary divergence of field and laboratory populations of Manduca sexta in response to host-plant quality

Ecological Entomology

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 166-174

  Diamond, Sarah E ^a   Hawkins, Sarah Dyer ^a   Nijhout, H Frederik ^b   Kingsolver, Joel G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diet breadth; Evolutionary divergence; Laboratory domestication; Manduca sexta; Specialisation

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL DIET; DIVERGENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FECUNDITY; FITNESS; HOST PLANT; HOST RANGE; LABORATORY METHOD; MOTH; REARING; SPECIALIZATION; TOBACCO;

ANIMALIA; HEXAPODA; MANDUCA SEXTA; NICOTIANA TABACUM; PROBOSCIDEA LOUISIANICA;

EID: 77951187226     PISSN: 03076946     EISSN: 13652311     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2009.01166.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Agrawal AA. Host-range evolution: adaptation and trade-offs in fitness of mites on alternative hosts. Ecology 2000, 81:500-508.
2. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 2003, 141:399-436. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group
3. Bell RA, Joachim FG. Techniques for rearing laboratory colonies of tobacco hornworms and pink bollworms. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 1976, 60:365-373.
4. Cacoyianni Z, Kovacs IV, Hoffmann AA. Laboratory adaptation and inbreeding in Helicoverpa punctigera (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 1995, 43:83-90.
5. Cooper VS, Lenski RE. The population genetics of ecological specialization in evolving Escherichia coli populations. Nature 2000, 407:736-739.
6. Cornell HV, Hawkins BA. Patterns of herbivorous insect response to plant secondary compounds: a test of phytochemical coevolution theory. American Naturalist 2003, 161:507-522.
7. D'Amico LJ, Davidowitz G, Nijhout HF. The developmental and physiological basis of body size evolution in an insect. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 2001, 268:1589-1593.
8. van Dam NM, Hadwich K, Baldwin IT. Induced responses in Nicotiana attenuata affect behavior and growth of the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta. Oecologia (Berlin) 2000, 122:371-379.
9. Davidowitz G, D'Amico LJ, Nijhout HF. Critical weight in the development of insect body size. Evolution and Development 2003, 5:188-197.
10. Davidowitz G, D'Amico LJ, Nijhout HF. The effects of environmental variation on a mechanism that controls insect body size. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2004, 6:49-62.
11. Davidowitz G, Roff DA, Nijhout HF. A physiological perspective on the response of body size and development time to simultaneous directional selection. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2005, 45:525-531.
12. Diamond SE, Kingsolver JG. Environmental dependence of thermal reaction norms: host plant quality can reverse the temperature-size rule. American Naturalist 175:1-10. (2010)
13. Economopoulos AP. Adaptation of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera, Tephritidae) to artificial rearing. Journal of Economic Entomology 1992, 85:753-758.
14. Ehrlich PR, Raven PH. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 1964, 18:586-608.
15. Esperk T, Tammaru T, Nylin S. Intraspecific variability in number of larval instars in insects. Journal of Economic Entomology 2007, 100:627-645.
16. Feyereisen R. Insect P450 enzymes. Annual Review of Entomology 1999, 44:507-533.
17. Gibbs RD. The Chemotaxonomy of Flowering Plants 1974, McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
18. Harborne JB, Turner BL. Plant Chemosystematics 1984, Academic Press, London, U.K
19. Harshman LG, Hoffmann AA. Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2000, 15:32-36.
20. Ihlenfeldt HD. Martyniaceae. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. VII. Flowering Plants. Dicotyledons. Lamiales (except Acanthaceae including Avicenniaceae) 2004, 50-56. Kadereit J. (ed. by, pp., Springer, Berlin, Germany
21. Jaenike J. Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1990, 21:243-273.
22. Kingsolver JG. Variation in growth and instar number in field and laboratory Manduca sexta. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B-Biological Sciences 2007, 274:977-981.
23. Kingsolver JG, Nagle A. Evolutionary divergence in thermal sensitivity and diapause of field and laboratory populations of Manduca sexta. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 2007, 80:473-479.
24. Kingsolver JG, Ragland GJ, Diamond SE. Evolution in a constant environment: thermal fluctuations and thermal sensitivity of laboratory and field populations of Manduca sexta. Evolution 2009, 63:537-541.
25. Knuckles BE, Kohler GO, deFremery D. Processing of fresh tobacco leaves for protein fractions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1979, 27:414-418.
26. Krischik VA, Goth RW, Barbosa P. Generalized plant defense effects on multiple species. Oecologia (Berlin) 1991, 85:562-571.
27. Madden AH, Chamberlin FS. Biology of the tobacco hornworm in the southern cigar-tobacco district 1945, 896. USDA Technical Bulletin,, USDA, Washington, D.C.
28. Matos M, Rose MR, Pite MTR, Rego C, Avelar T. Adaptation to the laboratory environment in Drosophila subobscura. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2000, 13:9-19.
29. Mechaber WL, Hildebrand JG. Novel, non-solanaceous hostplant record for Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) in the southwestern United States. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 2000, 93:447-451.
30. Mira A, Bernays EA. Trade-offs in host use by Manduca sexta: plant characters vs natural enemies. Oikos 2002, 97:387-397.
31. Mira A, Raubenheimer D. Divergent nutrition-related adaptations in two cockroach populations inhabiting different environments. Physiological Entomology 2002, 27:330-339.
32. Radford AE, Ahles HE, Bell CR. Guide to the vascular flora of the Carolinas, with distribution in the Southeastern States 1964, The Book Exchange, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
33. Ren N, Timko MP. AFLP analysis of genetic polymorphism and evolutionary relationships among cultivated and wild Nicotiana species. Genome 2001, 44:559-571.
34. Reynolds SE, Yeomans MR, Timmins WA. The feeding behaviour of caterpillars (Manduca sexta) on tobacco and on artificial diet. Physiological Entomology 1986, 11:39-51.
35. Rose MR, Nusbaum TJ, Chippindale AK. Laboratory evolution: the experimental wonderland and the Cheshire cat. Adaptation 1996, 221-241. Rose M R, Lauder G V, (ed. by, pp., Academic Press, San Diego, California
36. Rothschild W, Jordan K. A revision of the lepidopterous family Sphingidae. Novitates Zoologicae 1903, 9:1-972. (Suppl. 1 and 2),
37. Sasaki H, Taguchi H, Endo T, Yosioka I, Higashiyama K, Otomasu H. Glycosides of Martynia louisiana Mill. A new phenylpropanoid glycoside, martynoside. Chemical and Pharmacological Bulletin 1978, 26:2111-2121.
38. Service PM, Rose MR. Genetic covariation among life-history components: the effect of novel environments. Evolution 1985, 39:943-945.
39. Simoes P, Rose MR, Duarte A, Goncalves R, Matos M. Evolutionary domestication in Drosophila subobscura. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2007, 20:758-766.
40. Sisson VA, Saunders JA. Alkaloid composition of the USDA tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) introduction collection. Tobacco Science 1982, 26:117-120.
41. Small JK. Flora of the Southeastern United States 1903, New York, New York
42. Stamp NE, Erskine T, Paradise CJ. Effects of rutin-fed caterpillars on an invertebrate predator depend on temperature. Oecologia (Berlin) 1991, 88:289-295.
43. Stevens JL, Snyder MJ, Koener JF, Feyereisen R. Inducible P450s of the CYP9 family from larval Manduca sexta midgut. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2000, 30:559-568.
44. Timmins WA, Reynolds SE. Azadirachtin inhibits secretion of trypsin in midgut of Manduca sexta caterpillars: reduced growth due to impaired protein digestion. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1992, 63:47-54.
45. Timmins WA, Bellward K, Stamp AJ, Reynolds SE. Food intake, conversion efficiency and feeding behavior of tobacco hornworm caterpillars given artificial diet of varying nutrient and water content. Physiological Entomology 1988, 17:303-314.
46. Traugott MS, Stamp NE. Effects of chlorogenic acid- and tomatine-fed caterpillars on performance of an insect predator. Oecologia (Berlin) 1997, 109:265-272.
47. Via S. Ecological genetics and host adaptation in herbivorous insects: the experimental study of evolution in natural and agricultural systems. Annual Review of Entomology 1990, 35:421-446.
48. Warbrick-Smith J, Behmer ST, Lee KP, Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ. Evolving resistance to obesity in an insect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:14045-14049.
49. Yamamoto RT. Mass rearing of the tobacco hornworm. II. Larval rearing and pupation. Journal of Economic Entomology 1969, 62:1427-1431.
50. Yamamoto RT. Induction of host-plant specificity in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta. Journal of Insect Physiology 1974, 20:641-650.
51. Yamamoto RT, Fraenkel GS. The specificity of the tobacco hornworm, Protoparce sexta, to solanaceous plants. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 1960, 53:503-507.
52. Yamamoto RT, Jenkins RY, McClusky RK. Factors determining selection of plants for oviposition by the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1969, 12:504-508.
53. Yamauchi H, Yoshitake N. Developmental stages of ovarian follicles of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Journal of Morphology 1984, 179:21-31.
54. Yang Y, Stamp NE. Simultaneous effects of night-time temperature and an allelochemical on performance of an insect herbivore. Oecologia (Berlin) 1995, 104:225-233.