Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling

Operations Research

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 371-382

  Ankenman, Bruce ^a   Nelson, Barry L ^a   Staum, Jeremy ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Simulation: design of experiments; Statistical analysis

Indexed keywords

BASIC THEORY; COMPUTER EXPERIMENT; DECISION VARIABLES; DESIGN AND ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES; EXPERIMENT DESIGN; KRIGING; KRIGING METHODS; META MODEL; METAMODELING; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; OUTPUT PERFORMANCE; RESPONSE SURFACE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC SIMULATIONS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; STATISTICAL METHODS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

EID: 77951184800     PISSN: 0030364X     EISSN: 15265463     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1090.0754     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ankenman, B., B. L. Nelson, J. Staum. 2008. Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. Proc. Winter Simulation Conf. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 362-370.
2. Barton, R. R., M. Meckesheimer. 2006. Metamodel-based simulation optimization. S. G. Henderson, B. L. Nelson, eds. Elsevier Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation, Chapter 19. Elsevier, New York.
3. Biles, W. E., J. P. C. Kleijnen, W. C. M. van Beers, I. Nieuwenhuyse. 2007. Kriging metamodeling in constrained simulation optimization: An exploratory study. Proc. 2007 Winter Simulation Conf. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 355-362.
4. Boesel, J., B. L. Nelson, S. Kim. 2003. Using ranking and selection to "clean up" after simulation optimization. Oper.Res. 51 814-825.
5. Cheng, R. C. H., J. P. C. Kleijnen. 1998. Improved design of queueing simulation experiments with highly heteroscedastic responses. Oper. Res. 47 762-777.
6. Cressie, N. A. C. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York.
7. Fang, K. T., R. Li, A. Sudjianto. 2006. Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
8. Kennedy, M. C., A. O'Hagan. 2000. Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 87 1-13.
9. Kleijnen, J. P. C., W. C. M. van Beers. 2005. Robustness of Kriging when interpolating in random simulation with heterogeneous variances: Some experiments. Eur. J .Oper .Res. 165 826-834.
10. Law, A. M., W. D. Kelton. 2000. Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
11. Mitchell, T. J., M. D. Morris. 1992. The spatial correlation function approach to response surface estimation. Proc. 1992 Winter Simulation Conf. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 565-571.
12. Myers, R. H., D. C. Montgomery. 2002. Response Surface Methodology, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.
13. Nelson, B. L. 1990. Control-variate remedies. Oper. Res. 38 974-992.
14. Nozari, A., S. F. Arnold, C. D. Pegden. 1987. Statistical analysis for use with the Schruben and Margolin correlation induction strategy. Oper. Res. 35 127-139.
15. O'Hagan, A., J. J. Forster. 2004. Bayesian Inference, 2nd ed. Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Volume 2B. Oxford University Press, London.
16. Sabuncuoglu, I., S. Touhami. 2002. Simulation metamodeling with neural networks: An experimental investigation. Internat. J. Production Res. 40 2483-2505.
17. Sacks, J., W. J. Welch, T. J. Mitchell, H. P. Wynn. 1989. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist. Sci. 4 409-423.
18. Santner, T. J., B. J. Williams, W. I. Notz. 2003. The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Springer, New York.
19. Schruben, L. W., B. H. Margolin. 1978. Pseudorandom number assignment in statistically designed simulation and distribution sampling experiments. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 73 504-525.
20. Searle, S. R., G. Casella, C. E. McCulloch. 1992. Variance Components. Wiley, New York.
21. Stein, M. L. 1999. Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging. Springer, New York.
22. Stump, G., S. Lego, M. Yukish, T. W. Simpson, J. A. Donndelinger. 2007. Visual steering commands for trade space exploration: User-guided sampling with example. F. Liou, ed. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences-Design Automation Conf. ASME, Las Vegas, NV, September 4-7, DETC2007/DAC-34684.
23. Tew, J. D., J. R. Wilson. 1992. Validation of simulation analysis methods for the Schruben-Margolin correlation-induction strategy. Oper. Res. 40 87-103.
24. Tew, J. D., J. R. Wilson. 1994. Estimating simulation metamodels using combined correlation-based variance reduction techniques. IIE Trans. 26 2-16.
25. van Beers, W. C. M., J. P. C. Kleijnen. 2003. Kriging for interpolation in random simulation. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 54 255-262.
26. van Beers, W. C. M., J. P. C. Kleijnen. 2008. Customized sequential designs for random simulation experiments: Kriging metamodeling and bootstrapping. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 186 1099-1113.
27. Whitt, W. 1989. Planning queueing simulations. Management Sci. 35 1341-1366.
28. Yang, F., B. E. Ankenman, B. L. Nelson. 2007. Efficient generation of cycle time-throughput curves through simulation and metamodeling. Naval Res. Logist. 54 78-93.