Tissue engineering scaffold material of porous nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide 66

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 331-335

  Xu, Qian ^a   Lu, Hongyan ^a   Zhang, Jingchao ^a   Lu, Guoyu ^b   Deng, Zhennan ^b   Mo, Anchun ^c  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Interconnected porosity; Nano hydroxyapatite; Osteoconductivity; Osteoinductivity; Polyamide; Porous

Indexed keywords

NANOHYDROXYAPATITE; NANOMATERIAL; POLYAMIDE 66; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONDUCTANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY; HISTOLOGY; NERVOUS TISSUE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; POROSITY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; VASCULAR TISSUE;

ANIMALS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; DURAPATITE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; NANOSTRUCTURES; NYLONS; OSTEOGENESIS; POROSITY; RABBITS; TIBIA; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 77951164284     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Mecall RA, Rosenfeld A. The influence of residual ridge resorption patterns on fixture placement and tooth positon. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1991;11(1):8-23.
2. Strocchi R, et al. Bone regeneration with calcium sulfate: evidence for increased angiogenesis in rabbits. J Oral Implantol. 2002;28:273-278.
3. Couri CJ, Maze GI, Hinkson DW, Byran H, Deborah V. Medical grade calcium sulfate hemihydrate versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in the treatment of mandibular class II furcations. J Periodontol, 2002;73(11):1352-1359.
4. Springer ING, Fleiner B, Jepsen S, Acil Y. Culture of cells gained from temporomandibular joint cartilage on non-absorbable scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2001;22(18):2569-2577.
5. Jie W, Yubao L. Tissue engineering scaffold material of nano-apatite crystals and polyamide composite. Eur Polym J. 2004;40:509-515.
6. Verheyen CCPM, de Wijn JR, van Blitterswijk CA, De Groot K. Evaluation of hydroxylapatite/poly (L-lactide) composites: mechanical behavior. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26:1277-1296.
7. Ungersbock A, Pohler O, Perren SM. Evaluation of the soft tissue interface at titanium implants with different surface treatments: experiment study on rabbits. Bio-Med Mat Eng. 1994;4(4):317-325.
8. Behling CA, Spector M. Quantitative characterization of cells at the interface of long-term implants of selected polymers. J Biomed Mater Res. 1986;20(5):653-666.
9. Kim HM, Furuya T, Kokubo T, Miyazaki T, Nakamura T. Composition of apatite produced in simulated body fluids. Bioceramics. Stafa-Zurich, Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications;2001:14: 621-624.
10. Green DW, Walsh D, Mann S, Oreffo ROC. The potential of biomimesis in bone tissue engineering: lessons from the design and synthesis of invertebrate skeletons. Bone. 2002;30(6):810-815.
11. Hulbert SF, Morrison SJ, Klawitter JJ. Tissue reaction to three ceramics of porous and non-porous structures. J Biomed Mater Res. 1972;6(5):347-374.
12. Vaz L, Lopes AB, Almeida M. Porosity control of hydroxyapatite implants. J Mater Sci Mater Medicine. 1999;10(4):239-242.
13. Wang Y, Kim HJ, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL. Stem cellbased tissue engineering with silk biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2006;27(36):6064-6082.