Comparison of cytologic evaluation between conventional method and cellprepplus® liquid-based cytology in body fluid

Korean Journal of Pathology

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 448-452

  Koo, Ji Hae ^a   Lee, Ho Chang ^a   Song, Hyung Geun ^a   Han, Hye Suk ^a   Lee, Ki Hyeong ^a   Choe, Kang Hyeon ^a   Lee, Ki Man ^a   Lee, Ok Jun ^a  

^a Chungbuk National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Body fluids; Cytology; Neoplasm metastasis

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951160938     PISSN: 17381843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2009.43.5.448     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Moriarty AT, Schwartz MR, Ducatman BS, et al. A liquid concept-do classic preparations of body cavity fluid perform differently than Thin Prep cases? Observations from the College of American Pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in nongynecologic cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008; 132: 1716-8.
2. ®. Korean J Cytopathol 2007; 18: 29-35.
3. Park JM, Lee JG, Suh IS. Clinical efficacy of manual liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology preparation: comparative study with conventional Papanicolaou test. Korean J Cytopathol 2005; 16: 10-7.
4. Jeon YK, Kim OR, Park KW, Kang SB, Park IA. Liquid-based cytology using MonoPrep2™ system in cervicovaginal cytology: comparative study with conventional Pap smear and history. Korean J Cytopathol 2004; 15: 33-9.
5. Lee S, Park JH, Do SI, et al. Diagnostic value of urine cytology in 236 cases; a comparison of liquid-based preparation and conventional cytospin method. Korean J Cytopathol 2007; 18: 119-25.
6. TM methodology. Korean J Cytopathol 2004; 15: 86-91.
7. ® method for evaluation of lung cancer. Diagn Cytopathol 2008; 36: 167-71.