-
2
-
-
72949114189
-
-
b) M. Ouchi, T. Terashima, M. Sawamoto, Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4963.
-
(2009)
Chem. Rev.
, vol.109
, pp. 4963
-
-
Ouchi, M.1
Terashima, T.2
Sawamoto, M.3
-
5
-
-
53449085075
-
-
c) G Moad, E. Rizzardo, S. H. Thang, Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1133.
-
(2008)
Acc. Chem. Res.
, vol.41
, pp. 1133
-
-
Moad, G.1
Rizzardo, E.2
Thang, S.H.3
-
6
-
-
33749853939
-
-
G. David, C. Boyer, J. Tonnar, B. Ameduri, P. Lacroix-Desmazes, B. Boutevin, Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3936.
-
(2006)
Chem. Rev.
, vol.106
, pp. 3936
-
-
David, G.1
Boyer, C.2
Tonnar, J.3
Ameduri, B.4
Lacroix-Desmazes, P.5
Boutevin, B.6
-
8
-
-
53949106689
-
-
b) S. Yamago, E. Kayahara, M. Kotani, B. Ray, Y. Kwak, A. Goto, T. Fukuda, Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 1326;
-
(2007)
Angew. Chem.
, vol.119
, pp. 1326
-
-
Yamago, S.1
Kayahara, E.2
Kotani, M.3
Ray, B.4
Kwak, Y.5
Goto, A.6
Fukuda, T.7
-
10
-
-
33947678097
-
-
c) Y. Kwak, M. Tezuka, A. Goto, T. Fukuda, S. Yamago, Macromolecules 2007, 40, 1881;
-
(2007)
Macromolecules
, vol.40
, pp. 1881
-
-
Kwak, Y.1
Tezuka, M.2
Goto, A.3
Fukuda, T.4
Yamago, S.5
-
12
-
-
84923787935
-
-
a) B. B. Wayland, G. Poszmik, S. L. Mukerjee, M. Fryd, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7943;
-
(1994)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.116
, pp. 7943
-
-
Wayland, B.B.1
Poszmik, G.2
Mukerjee, S.L.3
Fryd, M.4
-
16
-
-
60949084913
-
-
d) A. Debuigne, R. Poli, C. Jerome, C. Detrembleur, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 211;
-
(2009)
Prog. Polym. Sci.
, vol.34
, pp. 211
-
-
Debuigne, A.1
Poli, R.2
Jerome, C.3
Detrembleur, C.4
-
17
-
-
20444395985
-
-
e) A. Debuigne, J.-R. Caille, R. Jerome, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 1125;
-
(2005)
Angew. Chem.
, vol.117
, pp. 1125
-
-
Debuigne, A.1
Caille, J.-R.2
Jerome, R.3
-
19
-
-
0035781106
-
-
a) C. J. Hawker, A. W. Bosman, E. Harth, Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3661;
-
(2001)
Chem. Rev.
, vol.101
, pp. 3661
-
-
Hawker, C.J.1
Bosman, A.W.2
Harth, E.3
-
20
-
-
42549160066
-
-
b) V. Sciannamea, R. Jérôme, C. Detrembleur, Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1104;
-
(2008)
Chem. Rev.
, vol.108
, pp. 1104
-
-
Sciannamea, V.1
Jérôme, R.2
Detrembleur, C.3
-
25
-
-
33748288439
-
-
ATRP is not working for this polymer class, see: a) A. Mittal, S. Sivaram, D. Baskaran, Macromolecules 2006, 39, 5555.
-
(2006)
Macromolecules
, vol.39
, pp. 5555
-
-
Mittal, A.1
Sivaram, S.2
Baskaran, D.3
-
26
-
-
34548172175
-
-
For a successful RAFT polymerization, see: b) C. Cheng, G. Sun, E. Khoshdel, K. L. Wooley, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10086.
-
(2007)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.129
, pp. 10086
-
-
Cheng, C.1
Sun, G.2
Khoshdel, E.3
Wooley, K.L.4
-
30
-
-
0001622288
-
-
For a boron-containing alkoxide as polymerization regulator, see: T. C. Chung, W. Janvikul, H. L. Lu, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1996, 118, 705. Boron does modulate the reactivity of the alkoxyl radical, however, does not directly interact with the radical. Therefore, this process should not be regarded as a boron group transfer reaction.
-
(1996)
J. Am. Chem. Soc
, vol.118
, pp. 705
-
-
Chung, T.C.1
Janvikul, W.2
Lu, H.L.3
-
32
-
-
77951155538
-
-
M. Pouliot, P. Renaud, K. Schenk, A. Studer, T. Vogler, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 6153;
-
(2009)
Angew. Chem.
, vol.121
, pp. 6153
-
-
Pouliot, M.1
Renaud, P.2
Schenk, K.3
Studer, A.4
Vogler, T.5
-
34
-
-
77951161447
-
-
note
-
eff is the effective concentration of the V-70 derived initiating radicals and 141 corresponds to the molecular weight of the initiating moiety. We assume that about 35 % of the radicals that derive from V-70 do not act as initiating species, and instead undergo in-cage dimerization, With 1 equiv of V-70, we assume that within 1 h at 70°C around 1.3 equiv of initiating radicals are available for the polymerization process.
-
-
-
-
35
-
-
0037428016
-
-
R. R. Huddleston, D. F. Cauble, M. J. Krische, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 11.
-
(2003)
J. Org. Chem.
, vol.68
, pp. 11
-
-
Huddleston, R.R.1
Cauble, D.F.2
Krische, M.J.3
-
36
-
-
77951199440
-
-
Unfortunately, all attempts to oxidize the polymeric boron enolate with TEMPO failed so far. We recently reported (see Ref. [11]) that in B-enolate formation/TEMPO-trapping process about 10% of reduced enone was always formed. The mechanism of that reduction is currently still, not understood
-
Unfortunately, all attempts to oxidize the polymeric boron enolate with TEMPO failed so far. We recently reported (see Ref. [11]) that in B-enolate formation/TEMPO-trapping process about 10% of reduced enone was always formed. The mechanism of that reduction is currently still, not understood.
-
-
-
|