The relationship of social support to treatment entry and engagement: The community assessment inventory

Substance Abuse

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 43-52

  Kelly, Sharon M ^a   O'Grady, Kevin E ^b   Schwartz, Robert P ^a   Peterson, James A ^a   Wilson, Monique E ^a   Brown, Barry S ^a,c  

^a FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Heroin addiction; Methadone maintenance; Opioid addiction; Social support; Treatment engagement; Treatment entry

Indexed keywords

METHADONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OPIATE ADDICTION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; METHADONE; OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 77951107513     PISSN: 08897077     EISSN: 15470164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08897070903442640     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Brown BS, O'Grady KE, Battjes RJ, Katz EC. The Community Assessment Inventory-client views of supports to drug abuse treatment. JSAT. 2004;27:241-251.
2. Gruber KJ, Fleetwood TW. In-home continuing care services for substance use affected families. Subst Use Misuse 2004;39:1379-1403.
3. O'Farrell TJ, Feehan M. Alcoholism treatment and the family: do family and individual treatments for alcoholic adults have preventive effects for children? J Stud Alcohol. 1999;13:125-129.
4. Broome KM, Knight DK, Knight K, Hiller ML, Simpson DD. Peer, family, and motivational influences on drug treatment process and recidivism for probationers. J Clin Psychol. 1999;53:387-397.
5. McCrady BS, Epstein EE. Theoretical bases of family approaches to substance abuse treatment. In: Rotger F, Kekker DS, Morganstern J, eds. Treating Substance Abuse: Theory and Technique. New York: Guilford Press; 1999:117-142.
6. Wynne RD, McCrady BS, Kahler CW, Liddle HA, Palmer RB, Horberg LK, et al. When addictions affect the family. In: Harway M, ed. Treating the Changing Family. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1996:293-317.
7. Moore J, Finkelstein N. Parenting services for families affected by substance abuse. Child Welfare 2001;80:221-238.
8. ConstantiniMF,Wermuth L, Sorensen JL, Lyons JS. Family functioning as a predictor of progress in substance abuse treatment. JSAT 1992;9:331-335.
9. Tucker MB. U.S. ethnic minorities and drug abuse: an assessment of the science and practice. In J Addict. 1985;20:1021-1048.
10. Broome KM, Simpson DD, Joe GW. The role of social support following short-term inpatient treatment. Am J Addict. 2002;11:57-65.
11. Hanlon TE, Nurco DN, Bateman RW, O'Grady KE. The response of drug abuser parolees to a combination of treatment and intensive supervision. Prison J. 1998;78:31-44.
12. Battjes RJ, Onken LS, Delany PJ. Drug abuse treatment entry and engagement: report of a meeting on treatment readiness. J Clin Psychol. 1999;55:643-657.
13. Joe GW, Simpson DD, Broome KM. Retention and patient engagement models for different modalities in DATOS. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999;57:113-125.
14. Strauss S, Falkin G. Social support systems of women offenders who use drugs: a focus on the mother-daughter relationship. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2001;27:65-89.
15. Elliott DS, Huizinga D, Ageton SS. Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1985.
16. Thornberry TP, Lizotte AJ, Krohn MD, Farnworth M, Jang SJ. Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: a longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology 1994;32:47-83.
17. Warr M, Stafford MC. The influence of delinquent peers: what they think or what they do? Criminology 1991;29:851-866
18. Gandhi DH, Kavanaugh GJ, Jaffe JH. Young heroin users in Baltimore: a qualitative study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2006;32:177-188.
19. Hawkins JD, Fraser MW. The social networks of drug abusers before and after treatment. Int J Addict. 1987;22:343-355.
20. Nurco DN, Kinlock TW, O'Grady KE, Hanlon TE. Early family adversity as a precursor to narcotic addiction. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996;43:103-113.
21. Kelly SM.Holistic reentry: a multidimensional analysis of the revolving prison door. Dissertation Abstracts International 2005;67:175 (UMI No. 3207287).
22. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 1997;277:918-924.
23. Kelling G, Coles C. Fixing BrokenWindows: Restoring Order and Reducing Crime in our Communities. New York: Free Press; 1996.
24. Skogan W. Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Cities. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1990.
25. Wilson JQ, Kelling G. The police and neighborhood safety: broken windows. Atlantic 1982;127:29-38.
26. McLellan AT, Kushner , Metzger D, Peters R, Smith I, Grissom G, Pettinati H, Argeriou M. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index: historical critique and normative data. JSAT 1992;9:199-213.
27. Booth RE, Corsi KF, Mikulich SK. Improving entry to methadone maintenance among out-of-treatment injection drug users. JSAT 2002;24:305-311.
28. Carlson R, Wang J, Siegal H, Falck R, Guo J. An ethnographic approach to targeted sampling: Problems and solutions in AIDS prevention research among injection drug and crack-cocaine users. Human Organization 1994;53:279-286.
29. Peterson J, Schacht-Reisinger HS, Schwartz RP, Mitchell SG, Kelly SM, Brown BS, Agar MH. Targeted sampling in drug abuse research: a review and case study. J Field Methods. 2008;155-170.
30. Watters JK, Biernacki P. Targeted sampling: options for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems 1989;36:416-430.
31. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, O'Brien CP,Woody GE. An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: TheAddiction Severity Index.JNerv Ment Dis. 1980;168:26-33.
32. Hendricks VM, Kaplan CD, Van Limbeek J, Geerlings P. The Addiction Severity Index: reliability and validity in a Dutch addict sample. JSAT 1989;6:133-141.
33. Kosten T, Rounsaville BJ, Kleber HD. Concurrent validity of the Addiction Severity Index. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1983;171:606-610.
34. McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Cacciola JS, Griffith J, Evans F, Barr HL. New data from the ASI: Reliability and validity in three centers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1985;173:412-423.
35. Cronbach LJ. Essentials of Psychological Testing. 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Row; 1970.
36. Grella CE, Joshi V. Gender differences in drug treatment careers among clients in the national drug abuse treatment outcome study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999;25:385-406.
37. Knight DK, Cross DR, Giles-Sims J, Simpson DD. Psychosocial functioning among adult drug users: The role of parental absence, support and conflict. Int J Addict. 1995;30:1271-1288.
38. Hubbard RL,Marsden ME, Rachel JV, Harwood HJ, Cavanaugh ER, Ginzburg HM. Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 1989.
39. Simpson DD, Joe GW, Brown BS. Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav. 1997;11:294-307.
40. Friedman SR, Tempalski B, Cooper H, Perlis T, Keem M, Friedman R, Flom PL. Estimating numbers of injecting drug users in metropolitan areas for structural analyses of community vulnerability and for assessing relative degree of service provision for injecting drug users. J Urban Health 2004;81:377-400.