From principles to practices in feminist tourism research: A call for greater use of the survey method and the solicited diary

The Critical Turn in Tourism Studies: Innovative Research Methods

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 245-259

  Heimtun, Bente ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b INLAND NORWAY UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951103298     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780080470986     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Aitchison, C. (2000a). Women in leisure services: Managing the social-cultural nexus of gender equity. Managing Leisure, 5, 181-191.
2. Aitchison, C. (2000b). Poststructural feminist theories of representing others: A response to the 'crisis' in leisure studies' discourse. Leisure Studies, 19, 127-144.
3. Aitchison, C. (2001). Theorizing other discourses of tourism, gender and culture. Can the subaltern speak (in tourism)? Tourist Studies, 1, 133-147.
4. Aitchison, C. (2003). Gender and leisure: Social and cultural perspectives (1st ed.). London:Routledge.
5. Aitchison, C. (2005). Feminist and gender perspectives in leisure and tourism research. In: B. W. Ritchie, P. Burns, & C. Palmer (Eds), Tourism research methods: Integrating theory with practice (pp. 21-36). Oxon: Cabi Publishing.
6. Bagnoli, A. (2004). Researching identities with multi-method autobiographies. Sociological Research Online, 9. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/9/2/bagnoli.html.
7. Bell, L. (1998). Public and private meanings in diaries: Researching family and childcare. In: J. Ribbens, & R. Edwards (Eds). Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: Public knowledge and private lives (pp. 72-86). London: Sage.
8. Belsky, J. (2004). Contributions of qualitative research to understanding the politics of community ecotourism. In: J. Phillimore, & L. Goodson (Eds). Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies (pp. 273-291). London: Routledge.
9. Botterill, D. (2001). The epistemology of a set of tourism studies. Leisure Studies, 20, 199-214.
10. Braidotti, R. (1993). Embodiment, sexual difference and the nomadic subject. Hypatia, 8, 1-13.
11. Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity (10th ed.). New York:Routledge.
12. Cancian, F. M. (1992). Feminist science: Methodologies that challenge inequality. Gender & Society, 6, 623-642.
13. Clawson, M., & Knetsch, J. L. (1966). Economics of outdoor recreation. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press.
14. Cook, J. A., & Fonow, M. M. (1986). Knowledge and women's interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. Sociological Inquiry, 56, 2-29.
15. Dann, G., Nash, D., & Pearce, P. (1988). Methodology in tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 15, 1-28.
16. Dann, G. M. S., & Phillips, J. (2001). Qualitative tourism research in the late twentieth century and beyond. In: B. Faulkner, G. Moscardo, & E. Laws (Eds), Tourism in the twenty-first century (pp. 247-265). London: Continuum.
17. Desforges, L. (2000). Traveling the world: Identity and travel biography. Annals of Tourism Research, 27, 926-945.
18. DeVault, M. L. (1996). Talking back to sociology: Distinctive contributions of feminist methodology. Annual Review Sociology, 22, 29-50.
19. Eichler, M. (1988). Nonsexist research methods: A practical guide (1st ed.). Boston: Allen & Unvin.
20. Eichler, M. (1997). Feminist methodology. Current Sociology, 45, 9-36.
21. Elliot, H. (1997). The use of diaries in sociological research on health experience. Sociological Research Online, 2, 2. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/7.html.
22. Elsrud, T. (2001). Risk creation in traveling: Backpacker adventure narration. Annals of Tourism Research, 28, 597-617.
23. Enloe, C. (1989). Bananas, beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics (1st ed.). London: Pandora.
24. Fonow, M. M., & Cook, J. (1991). Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research (1st ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
25. Foucault, M. (1988). The care of the self: Volume 3 of the history of sexuality (1st ed.). New York:Vintage Books.
26. Fullagar, S. (2002). Narratives of travel: Desire and movement of feminine subjectivity. Leisure Studies, 21, 57-74.
27. Galani-Moutafi, V. (2000). The self and the other: Traveler, ethnographer, tourist. Annals of Tourism Research, 27, 203-224.
28. Gibson, H. (2001). Gender in tourism: Theoretical perspectives. In: Y. Apostolopoulos, S. Sönmez, & D. J. Timothy (Eds), Women as producers and consumers of tourism in developing regions (pp. 19-43). Westport: Praeger.
29. Griffiths, M. (1995). (Auto)biography and epistemology. Educational Review, 47, 75-89.
30. Goodson, L., & Phillimore, J. (2004). The inquiry paradigm in qualitative tourism research. In: J. Phillimore, & L. Goodson (Eds), Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies (pp. 30-45). London: Routledge.
31. Hall, M. (2004). Reflexivity and tourism research: Situating myself and/with others. In: J. Phillimore, & L. Goodson (Eds), Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies (pp. 137-155). London: Routledge.
32. Harding, S. (1987). Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In: S. Harding (Ed.). Feminism and methodology (pp. 1-14). Bloomington: Open University Press.
33. Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: "What is strong objectivity"? In: L. Alcoff, & E. Potter (Eds), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49-82). New York: Routledge.
34. Jamal, T., & Hollinshead, K. (2001). Tourism and the forbidden zone: The underserved power of qualitative inquiry. Tourism Management, 22, 63-82.
35. Jayaratne, T. E. (1983). The value of quantitative methodology for feminist research. In: G. Bowles, & R. D. Klein (Eds), Theories of women's studies (pp. 140-161). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
36. Jayaratne, T. E., & Stewart, S. (1991). Quantitative and qualitative methods in social sciences:Current issues and practical strategies. In: M. M. Fonow, & J. Cook (Eds), Beyond methodology:Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 85-106). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
37. Johnston, L. (2001). (Other) bodies and tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 28, 180-201.
38. Jokinen, E. (2004). The makings of mother in diary narratives. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 339-359.
39. Jordan, F. (2003). Gendered discourses of tourism: The experiences of mid-life women travelling solo. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Gloucestershire, Gloucestershire.
40. Keller, E. F., & Grontkowski, C. R. (1983). The mind's eye. In: S. Harding, &. M. B. Hintikka (Eds), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science (pp. 207-224). London: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
41. Kelly, L., Regan, L., & Burton, S. (1992). Defending the indefensible? Qualitative methods and feminist research. In: H. Hinds, A. Phoenix, & J. Stacey (Eds), Working out: New directions for women's study (pp. 149-160). London: The Falmer Press.
42. Kelly, L., Burton, S., & Regan, L. (1994). Researching women's lives or studying women's oppression? Reflections on what constitutes feminist research. In: M. Maynard, & J. Purvis (Eds), Researching women's lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 27-48). London: Taylor & Francis.
43. Lawson, V. (1995). The politics of difference: Examining the quantitative/qualitative dualism in poststructuralist feminist research. Professional Geographer, 47, 449-457.
44. Lensik, J. N. (1987). Expanding the boundaries of criticism: The diary as female autobiography. Women's Studies, 14, 39-53.
45. Letherby, G. (2003). Feminist research in theory and practice (1st ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
46. Letherby, G. (2004). Quoting and counting: An autobiographical response to Oakley. Sociology, 38, 175-189.
47. Lloyd, G. (1984). The man of reason: "Male" and "female" in Western philosophy (1st ed.). London:Methuen.
48. Markwell, K., & Basche, C. (1998). Using personal diaries to collect data. Annals of Tourism Research, 25, 228-230.
49. Mattingly, D. J., & Falconer-Al-Hindi, K. (1995). Should women count? A context for the debate. Professional Geographer, 47, 427-435.
50. Maynard, M. (1994). Methods, practice and epistemology: The debate about feminism and research. In: M. Maynard, & J. Purvis (Eds), Researching women's lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 10-26). London: Taylor & Francis.
51. McCabe, S. (2002). The tourist experience and everyday life. In: G. M. S. Dann (Ed.), The tourist as a metaphor of the social world (pp. 61-76). Oxon: CABI Publishing.
52. McNay, L. (2000). Gender and agency: Reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory (1st ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
53. McNay, L. (2004). Situated intersubjectivity. In: B. L. Marshall & A. Witz (Eds), Engendering the social: Feminist encounters with sociological theory (pp. 171-186). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
54. Meth, P. (2003). Entries and omissions: Using solicited diaries in geographical research. Area, 35, 195-205.
55. Morris, K., Woodward, D., & Peters, E. (1998). 'Whose side are you on?' Dilemmas in conducting feminist ethnographic research with young women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1, 217-230.
56. Neumann, M. (1992). The trail through experience: Finding self in the recollection of travel. In:C. Ellis, & M. G. Flaherty (Eds), Investigating subjectivity (pp. 176-201). Newbury Park: Sage.
57. Oakley, A. (1998). Gender, methodology and people's ways of knowing; some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in social science. Sociology, 32, 707-731.
58. Oakley, A. (2000). Experiments in knowing: Gender and method in the social sciences (1st ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
59. Pearce, D. G. (1988). Tourist time-budgets. Annals of Tourism Research, 15, 106-121.
60. Phillimore, J., & Goodson, L. (2004). Progress in qualitative research in tourism: Epistemology, ontology and methodology. In: J. Phillimore, & L. Goodson (Eds), Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies (pp. 3-29). London: Routledge.
61. Pritchard, A. (2001). Tourism and representation: A scale for measuring gendered portrayals. Leisure Studies, 20, 79-94.
62. Ramazonÿlu, C., & Holland, J. (2002). Feminist methodology: Challenges and choices (1st ed.). London: Sage.
63. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. Riley, R. W., & Love, L. L. (2000). The state of qualitative tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 27, 164-187.
65. Ritchie, B. W., Burns, P., & Palmer, C. (Eds) (2005). Tourism research methods: Integrating theory with practice. Oxon: Cabi Publishing.
66. Rocheleau, D. (1995). Maps, numbers, text, and context: Mixing methods in feminist political ecology. Professional Geographer, 47, 458-466.
67. Ryan, C. (2005). Ethics in tourism research: Objectivities and personal perspectives. In: B. W. Ritchie, P. Burns, & C. Palmer (Eds), Tourism research methods: Integrating theory with practice (pp. 9-20). Oxon: Cabi Publishing.
68. Simmons, B. A. (2003). Travel talk: When knowledge and practice collide. Tracking gendered discourses in popular texts; in the stories of contemporary Australian women who work in the travel industry; and women who begin international leisure travel in mid-life. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Newcastle, Newcastle.
69. Small, J. (2002). Good and bad holiday experiences: Women's and girl's perspective. In: M. B. Swain, & J. H. Momsen (Eds), Gender/Tourism/Fun(?) (pp. 24-38). New York: Cognizant Communiction Corporation.
70. Sprague, J., & Zimmerman, M. K. (1989). Quality and quantity: Reconstructing feminist methodology. The American Sociologist, 20, 71-86.
71. Squire, S. J. (1994). Accounting for cultural meanings: The interface between geography and tourism studies re-examined. Progress in Human Geography, 18, 1-16.
72. Stanley, L. (1990). Feminist praxis and the academic mode of production. An editorial introduction. In: L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist praxis: Research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology (pp. 3-19). London: Routledge.
73. Stanley, L. (1992). The auto/biographical I: The theory and practice of feminist auto/biography (1st ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
74. Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1990). Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research process. In: L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist praxis: Research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology (pp. 20-59). London: Routledge.
75. Swain, M. B. (2004). (Dis)embodied experience and power dynamics in tourism research. In:J. Phillimore, & L. Goodson (Eds), Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies (pp. 102-118). London: Routledge.
76. Swain, M. B., & Momsen, J. H. (Eds) (2002). Gender/er/Tourism/Fun(?) (1st ed.). New York: Cognizant Communiction Corporation.
77. Veijola, S., & Jokinen, E. (1994). The body in tourism. Theory, Culture & Society, 11, 125-151.
78. Walle, A. H. (1997). Quantitative versus qualitative tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 24, 524-536.
79. Wearing, B. (1998). Leisure and feminist theory (1st ed.). London: Sage.
80. Wearing, S., & Neil, J. (2000). Refiguring self and identity through volunteer tourism. Society and Leisure, 23, 389-419.
81. Wilson, E. W. (2004). A 'Journey of her own'? The impact of constraints on women's solo travel. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Griffith University.