Integration of haptic and visual size cues in perception and action revealed through cross-modal conflict

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 201, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 863-873

  Pettypiece, Charles E ^a   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a   Culham, Jody C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Grasping; Haptics; Kinematics; Manual estimation; Multisensory integration; Vision; Weber's law

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; TACTILE MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL MEMORY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; CUES; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; TOUCH PERCEPTION; UNCERTAINTY; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77951093669     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2101-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. S Aglioti JFX DeSouza MA Goodale 1995 Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand Curr Biol 5 679 685 10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00133-3 1:CAS:528:DyaK2MXmtlOnur8%3D 7552179
2. A Amedi R Malach T Hendler S Peled E Zohary 2001 Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway Nat Neurosci 4 3 324 330 10.1038/85201 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXhsF2ru7o%3D 11224551 (Pubitemid 32194882)
3. S Chieffi M Gentilucci 1993 Coordination between the transport and the grasp components during prehension movements Exp Brain Res 94 471 477 10.1007/BF00230205 1:STN:280:DyaK3szmsFKiug%3D%3D 8359261
4. R Coats GP Bingham M Mon-Williams 2008 Calibrating grasp size and reach distance: interactions reveal integral organization of reaching-to-grasp movements Exp Brain Res 189 211 220 10.1007/s00221-008-1418-5 18493753
5. MO Ernst MS Banks 2002 Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion Nature 415 429 433 10.1038/415429a 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XhtVCntrY%3D 11807554 (Pubitemid 34100953)
6. T Ganel E Chajut D Algom 2008 Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles Curr Biol 18 14 R599 R601 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.052 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXoslOnsb8%3D 18644333 (Pubitemid 351970682)
7. M Gentilucci E Daprati I Toni S Chieffi MC Saetti 1995 Unconscious updating of grasp motor program Exp Brain Res 105 291 303 10.1007/BF00240965 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FmsVSqsA%3D%3D 7498382
8. M Gentilucci E Daprati M Gangitano 1998 Haptic information differentially interferes with visual analysis in reaching-grasping control and in perceptual processes Neuroreport 9 887 891 10.1097/00001756-199803300-00023 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3jvFarug%3D%3D 9579685
9. MA Goodale AD Milner 1992 Separate visual pathways for perception and action Trends Neurosci 15 20 25 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 1:STN:280:DyaK383mtlGhtA%3D%3D 1374953
10. MA Goodale AD Milner LS Jakobson DP Carey 1991 A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them Nature 349 6305 154 156 10.1038/349154a0 1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2FpsFSitQ%3D%3D 1986306
11. C Grefkes PH Weiss K Zilles GR Fink 2002 Crossmodal processing of object features in human anterior intraparietal cortex: an fMRI study implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys Neuron 35 1 173 184 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00741-9 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XlslOqtr0%3D 12123617 (Pubitemid 34804331)
12. AM Haffenden MA Goodale 1998 The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception J Cogn Neurosci 10 1 122 136 10.1162/089892998563824 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7psFCntQ%3D%3D 9526087 (Pubitemid 28064465)
13. AM Haffenden KC Schiff MA Goodale 2001 The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp Curr Biol 11 3 177 181 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00023-9 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXhtlGlu7g%3D 11231152 (Pubitemid 32152102)
14. HB Hilbig MO Ernst 2007 Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch Exp Brain Res 179 595 606 10.1007/s00221-006-0814-y (Pubitemid 46800594)
15. Y Hu MA Goodale 2000 Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics J Cogn Neurosci 12 5 856 868 10.1162/ 089892900562462 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crgs1Cktw%3D%3D 11054927
16. A Kritikos M Beresford U Castiello 2002 Tactile interference in visually guided reach-to-grasp movements Exp Brain Res 144 1 7 10.1007/s00221-002-1004-1 11976754 (Pubitemid 34439299)
17. A Loftus P Servos MA Goodale N Mendarozqueta M Mon-Williams 2004 When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance Exp Brain Res 158 317 327 15164152
18. CE Pettypiece JC Culham MA Goodale 2009 Differential effects of delay upon visually and haptically guided grasping and perceptual judgements Exp Brain Res 195 473 479 10.1007/s00221-009-1807-4 19404627
19. I Rock J Victor 1964 Vision and touch: an experimentally created conflict between two senses Science 143 594 596 10.1126/science.143.3606.594 1:STN:280:DyaF2c%2Fjsl2ktg%3D%3D 14080333
20. R Teghtsoonian M Teghtsoonian 1970 Two varieties of perceived length Percept Psychophys 8 6 389 392
21. DA Westwood MA Goodale 2003 Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action Spat Vis 16 3-4 243 254 10.1163/156856803322467518 12858950
22. DA Westwood M Heath EA Roy 2001 The accuracy of reaching movements in brief delay conditions Can J Exp Psychol 55 4 304 310 1:STN:280: DC%2BD38%2FktVKmtQ%3D%3D 11768855
23. AM Wing A Turton C Fraser 1986 Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching J Mot Behav 3 245 260