An easy way to reduce PIT-tag loss in rodents

Ecological Research

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 251-253

  Lebl, Karin ^a   Ruf, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE   (Austria)

Author keywords

Capture recapture; Glis glis; Marking techniques; Passive integrated transponders; Tag loss

Indexed keywords

CAPTURE METHOD; FIELD SURVEY; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; RODENT; TAGGING;

MYOXIDAE; MYOXUS GLIS; RODENTIA;

EID: 77951092060     PISSN: 09123814     EISSN: 14401703     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-009-0629-y     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Fokidis HB, Robertson C, Risch TS (2006) Keeping tabs: are redundant marking systems needed for rodents? Wildl Soc Bull 34: 764-771.
2. Gibbons JW, Andrews KM (2004) PIT tagging: simple technology at its best. BioScience 54: 447-454.
3. Harper SJ, Batzli GO (1996) Monitoring use of runways by voles with passive integrated transponders. J Mamm 77: 364-369.
4. McDonald TL, Amstrup SC, Manly BFJ (2003) Tag loss can bias Jolly-Seber capture-recapture estimates. Wildl Soc Bull 31: 814-822.
5. Morley CG (2002) Evaluating the performance of PIT tags and ear tags in a capture-recapture experiment. N Z J Zool 29: 143-148.
6. Pollock KH, Nichols JD, Brownie C, Hines JE (1990) Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildl Monogr 107: 1-97.
7. R Development Core Team (2007) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2.6.1). R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
8. Schlund W (1996) Vergleich von Siebenschläferpopulationen (Myoxus glis L.) in zwei unterschiedlichen Waldgebieten. Dissertaion, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Germany.
9. Schooley RL, van Horne B, Burnham KP (1993) Passive integrated transponders for marking free-ranging Townsend's ground squirrels. J Mamm 74: 480-484.