Privacy and social implications of distinct sensing approaches to implementing smart homes for older adults

Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Engineering the Future of Biomedicine, EMBC 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 4311-4314

  Demiris, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

DIRECT SENSING; END USERS; INFRASTRUCTURE-MEDIATED SENSING; OLDER ADULTS; SMART HOMES; SOCIAL IMPLICATION; TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 77951056230     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333800     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13(3):319-340.
2. Friedman B, Peter H Kanh J. Human values, ethics, and design. In: Jacko JA, Sears A, editors. The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook.
3. Bauer KA. Home-based telemedicine: A survey of ethical issues. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2001;10:137-146.
4. Brey P. Freedom and privacy in Ambient Intelligence. Ethics and Information Technology 2005;7:157-166.
5. Friedman B, Peter H Kanh J, Borning A. Value Sensitive Design and information systems. In: Zhang P, Galletta D, editors. Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe; 2006. p. 348-371.
6. Magnusson L, Hanson EJ. Ethical issues arising from a research, technology and development project to support frail older people and their family carers at home. Health and Social Care in the Community 2003;11(5):431-439.
7. Melenhorst A-S, Fisk AD, Mynatt ED, Rogers WA. Potential intrusiveness of aware home technology: Perceptions of older adults. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting; 2004; New Orleans; 2004. p. 266-270.
8. Stip E, Rialle V. Environmental cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: ethical implications of "smart home" technology. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 2005;50(5):281-291
9. Wylde M, Valins M. The impact of technology. In: Valins M, Salter D, editors. Futurecare: New Directions in Planning Health and Care Environments. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1996. p. 15-24.
10. Hensel, B.K., Demiris, G. and Courtney, K.L. (2006). Defining Obtrusiveness in Home Telehealth Technologies: A Conceptual Framework. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 13(4). 428-431.
11. Abascal, J. and Nicolle, C. (2005). Moving Towards Inclusive Design Guidelines for Socially and Ethically Aware HCI. Interacting with Computers 17(5). 484-505.
12. rd ed. Farmington Hills, Michigan: Thomson Gale; 2004. p. 2120-2130.
13. Ruddick W. Transforming homes and hospitals. Hastings Center Report 1994;24(5):S11-S14.
14. Cowan D, Turner-Smith A. The role of assistive technology in alternative models of care for older people. In: With respect to old age research. London: Age Concern Institute of Gerontology, Kings College; 1999. p. Appendix 4: 325-346.
15. Korr W, Encandela J, Brieland D. Independence or autonomy: Which is the goal? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2005;28:290-299
16. Miskelly, F.G. (2001). Assistive Technology in Elderly Care. Age and Aging 30(6). 455-458.
17. Rialle, V., Duchene, F., Noury, N., Bajolle, L. and Demonjeot, J. (2002). Health "Smart" Home: Information Technology for Patients at Home. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 8(4). 395-409.
18. Suzuki, R., Ogawa, M., Tobimatsu, Y. and Iwaya, T. (2001). Time- Course Action Analysis of Daily Life Investigations in the Welfare Techno House in Mizusawa. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 7(3). 249-259.
19. Lymberis, A. and Olsson, S. (2003). Intelligent Biomedical Clothing for Personal Health and Disease Management: State of the Art and Future Vision. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 9(4). 379-386.
20. Ling, E., McDonald, L., Dinesen, T.R. and DuVall, D. (2002). The OxyArm: A New Minimal Contact Oxygen Delivery System for Mouth or Nose Breathing. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 49(3). 297-301.
21. Suzuki, R., Ogawa, M., Otake, S., Izutsu, T., Tobimatsu, Y. and Iwaya, T. (2004). Analysis of Activities of Daily Living in Elderly People Living Alone: Single-Subject Feasibility Study. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 10(2). 260-276.
22. Courtney, K.L., Demiris, G. and Hensel, B.K. (2007). Obtrusiveness of Information-Based Assistive Technologies as Perceived by Older Adults in Residential Care Facilities: A Secondary Analysis. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 32(3). 241-249.
23. Bellotti, V. and Sellen, A. (1993). Design for Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing Environments. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW), 77-92.
24. Benoliel JW. (1996). Grounded theory and nursing knowledge. Qual Health Res., 6:406-428
25. Caine KE, Rogers WA & Fisk AD (2005). Privacy perceptions of an aware home with visual sensing devices. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
26. Hong, J.I. and Landay, J.A. (2004). An Architecture for Privacy Sensitive Ubiquitous Computing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys 2004), 177-189.
27. Palen, L. and Dourish, P. (2003). Unpacking "Privacy" for a Networked World. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2003), 129-136.
28. Lessig, L. (1999). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.